World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 114 327 285 210 180 357 68483

J. David Hawkins publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by J. David Hawkins between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. J. David Hawkins published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2012. 5 of the 377 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2012. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
1977 2025

377 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
J. David Hawkins: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 1
1979 2
1980 2
1981 3
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 3
1986 2
1987 7
1988 5
1989 4
1990 3
1991 6
1992 8
1993 3
1994 3
1995 5
1996 7
1997 4
1998 6
1999 9
2000 8
2001 12
2002 14
2003 10
2004 9
2005 8
2006 7
2007 12
2008 15
2009 12
2010 15
2011 16
2012 20
2013 17
2014 18
2015 15
2016 20
2017 15
2018 18
2019 8
2020 5
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
2025 4
Total 377
Download as CSV

J. David Hawkins publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. David Hawkins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 357 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 357
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

J. David Hawkins D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. David Hawkins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32 114
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

J. David Hawkins is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily within medicine, health professions, and social sciences. The subfields of their work include general health professions, clinical psychology, health, public health, and environmental and occupational health, as well as sociology and political science.

The scientist has contributed significantly to topics involving child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, homelessness and social issues, health disparities and outcomes, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, smoking behavior and cessation, health policy implementation science, and child abuse and trauma.

Recent publications by J. David Hawkins include the following papers:

  • Evidence-based juvenile justice programs and practices: A critical review, 2020, Criminology & Public Policy
  • Outcomes of Childhood Preventive Intervention Across 2 Generations, 2020, JAMA Pediatrics
  • Long-term Impacts and Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Communities That Care Prevention System at Age 23, 12 Years After Baseline, 2021, Prevention Science
  • State of the Art in Substance Use Prevention and Early Intervention: Applications to Pediatric Primary Care Settings, 2021, Prevention Science
  • Applying the Social Development Model in Middle Childhood to Promote Healthy Development: Effects from Primary School Through the 30s and Across Generations, 2020, Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology

The researcher frequently collaborates with other scholars. Notable frequent coauthors include:

  • Jennifer A. Bailey
  • Rick Kosterman
  • Sabrina Oesterle
  • Marina Epstein
  • Richard F. Catalano

The scientist's work has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Prevention Science
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health
  • Criminology & Public Policy
  • JAMA Pediatrics

Best Publications

  • Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention.

    J. David Hawkins;Richard F. Catalano;Janet Y. Miller

  • Positive Youth Development in the United States: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs

    Richard F. Catalano;M. Lisa Berglund;Jean A. M. Ryan;Heather S. Lonczak

  • The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior.

    Richard F. Catalano;J. David Hawkins

  • The Science of Prevention: A Conceptual Framework and Some Directions for a National Research Program

    John D. Coie;Norman F. Watt;Stephen G. West;J. David Hawkins

  • Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood.

    J. David Hawkins;Richard F. Catalano;Rick Kosterman;Rebecca Abbott

  • The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention.

    J. David Hawkins;Joseph G. Weis

  • The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: findings from the Social Development Research Group.

    Richard F. Catalano;Kevin P. Haggerty;Sabrina Oesterle;Charles B. Fleming

  • Predictors of Early High School Dropout: A Test of Five Theories.

    Sara Battin-Pearson;Michael D. Newcomb;Robert D. Abbott;Karl G. Hill

  • Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors. The Communities That Care Youth Survey.

    Michael W. Arthur;J. David Hawkins;John A. Pollard;Richard F. Catalano

  • Communities That Care: Action for Drug Abuse Prevention

    J. David Hawkins;Richard F. Catalano Jr.

  • A review of predictors of youth violence.

    J. David Hawkins;Todd Herrenkohl;David P. Farrington;Devon Brewer

  • Developmental risk factors for youth violence

    Todd I Herrenkohl;Eugene Maguin;Karl G Hill;J.David Hawkins

  • Exploring the effects of age of alcohol use initiation and psychosocial risk factors on subsequent alcohol misuse

    J. D. Hawkins;J. W. Graham;E. Maguin;R. Abbott

  • Promoting science-based prevention in communities

    J.David Hawkins;Richard F Catalano;Michael W Arthur

  • Predictors of Youth Violence

    J. David Hawkins;Todd I. Herrenkohl;David P. Farrington;Devon Brewer

  • Delinquency and crime : current theories

    J. David Hawkins

  • Modeling the Etiology of Adolescent Substance Use: A Test of the Social Development Model

    Richard F. Catalano;Rick Kosterman;J. David Hawkins;Michael D. Newcomb

  • Risk and protection: Are both necessary to understand diverse behavioral outcomes in adolescence?

    John A. Pollard;J. David Hawkins;Michael W. Arthur

  • The dynamics of alcohol and marijuana initiation: patterns and predictors of first use in adolescence.

    R. Kosterman;J. D. Hawkins;Jie Guo;R. F. Catalano

  • Prevention science and positive youth development: competitive or cooperative frameworks?

    Richard F Catalano;J.David Hawkins;M.Lisa Berglund;John A Pollard

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard F. Catalano
Richard F. Catalano University of Washington
Karl G. Hill
Karl G. Hill University of Colorado Boulder
Rick Kosterman
Rick Kosterman University of Washington
Robert D. Abbott
Robert D. Abbott University of Washington
Abigail A. Fagan
Abigail A. Fagan University of Florida
Michael W. Arthur
Michael W. Arthur University of Washington
Todd I. Herrenkohl
Todd I. Herrenkohl University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David P. Farrington
David P. Farrington University of Cambridge
Kevin P. Haggerty
Kevin P. Haggerty University of Washington
W. Alex Mason
W. Alex Mason University of Nebraska–Lincoln

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology offers a wide range of career pathways, including specialized fields such as substance abuse counseling. Many institutions now offer online psychology programs, making it easier to balance studies with work or personal commitments. When considering a career as a substance abuse counselor, it's important to understand the specific certification and education requirements in your state or city.

For example, Colorado Springs substance abuse counselor certification requirements differ from other regions and may include supervised clinical hours and examination. If you're interested in opportunities in Ohio, be sure to review the Columbus substance abuse counselors education requirements to ensure you meet the necessary criteria for licensure.

Aspiring professionals in Texas should also pay close attention to local standards. Explore the steps on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Corpus Christi and the specific substance abuse counselor requirements in Dallas. Each location may have unique regulations, so researching these details is essential for planning your academic and professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing J. David Hawkins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles