World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 100 615 537 391 331 394 48624

Marc A. Zimmerman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marc A. Zimmerman between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marc A. Zimmerman published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2015. 27 of the 469 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2015. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 32 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 12 publications
1975 2025

469 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marc A. Zimmerman: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 4
1991 4
1992 5
1993 2
1994 6
1995 10
1996 2
1997 5
1998 9
1999 3
2000 4
2001 3
2002 10
2003 10
2004 10
2005 5
2006 4
2007 6
2008 7
2009 11
2010 15
2011 17
2012 12
2013 29
2014 26
2015 32
2016 22
2017 24
2018 27
2019 22
2020 29
2021 30
2022 18
2023 14
2024 15
2025 12
Total 469
Download as CSV

Marc A. Zimmerman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc A. Zimmerman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 391–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 394 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57 394
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marc A. Zimmerman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc A. Zimmerman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57 100
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marc A. Zimmerman is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within the social sciences and psychology, with significant contributions focused on health, sociology and political science, clinical psychology, general health professions, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their work primarily addresses topics such as gun ownership and violence research, suicide and self-harm studies, crime patterns and interventions, injury epidemiology and prevention, homelessness and social issues, bullying, victimization, and aggression, as well as intimate partner and family violence.

Recent publications by Zimmerman include:

  • Parental Educational Attainment and Social Environment of Urban Public Schools in the U.S.: Blacks' Diminished Returns (2020), Children
  • Racial Disparities in Child Exposure to Firearm Violence Before and During COVID-19 (2022), American Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • Longitudinal pathway from violence exposure to firearm carriage among adolescents: The role of future expectation (2020), Journal of Adolescence
  • Place-Based Diminished Returns of Parental Educational Attainment on School Performance of Non-Hispanic White Youth (2020), Frontiers in Education
  • Adolescent Adverse Childhood Experiences and Risk of Adult Intimate Partner Violence (2020), American Journal of Preventive Medicine

They frequently publish in venues such as the American Journal of Community Psychology, Journal of School Violence, Preventive Medicine, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, and Abstracts.

Zimmerman has collaborated closely with several co-authors, including Justin E. Heinze, Rebecca M. Cunningham, Patrick M. Carter, Rebeccah L. Sokol, and Hsing-Fang Hsieh.

Best Publications

  • ADOLESCENT RESILIENCE: A Framework for Understanding Healthy Development in the Face of Risk

    Stevenson Fergus;Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations

    Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Empowerment theory, research, and application

    Douglas D. Perkins;Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment.

    Marc A. Zimmerman;Julian Rappaport

  • Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis.

    Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Health Education and Community Empowerment: Conceptualizing and Measuring Perceptions of Individual, Organizational, and Community Control

    Barbara A. Israel;Barry Checkoway;Amy J. Schulz;Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Racial identity, racial discrimination, perceived stress, and psychological distress among African American young adults.

    Robert M. Sellers;Cleopatra H. Caldwell;Karen H. Schmeelk-Cone;Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions

    Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Racial identity and academic attainment among African American adolescents.

    Tabbye M. Chavous;Debra Hilkene Bernat;Karen Schmeelk-Cone;Cleopatra H. Caldwell

  • Resiliency Research: Implications for Schools and Policy

    Marc A. Zimmerman;Revathy Arunkumar

  • Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment

    Marc A. Zimmerman;Barbara A. Israel;Amy J. Schulz;Barry Checkoway

  • Natural Mentors and Adolescent Resiliency: A Study with Urban Youth

    Marc A. Zimmerman;Jeffrey B. Bingenheimer;Paul C. Notaro

  • Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of participation and empowerment.

    Marc A. Zimmerman

  • A Typology of Youth Participation and Empowerment for Child and Adolescent Health Promotion

    Naima T. Wong;Marc A. Zimmerman;Edith A. Parker

  • A Longitudinal Study of Self-Esteem: Implications for Adolescent Development

    Marc A. Zimmerman;Laurel A. Copeland;Laurel A. Copeland;Jean Thatcher Shope;Terry E. Dielman

  • Adolescent Resilience: Promotive Factors That Inform Prevention

    Marc A. Zimmerman;Sarah A. Stoddard;Andria B. Eisman;Cleopatra H. Caldwell

  • Resiliency Theory A Strengths-Based Approach to Research and Practice for Adolescent Health

    Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Beyond the individual: toward a nomological network of organizational empowerment.

    N. Andrew Peterson;Marc A. Zimmerman

  • Racial Discrimination and Racial Identity as Risk or Protective Factors for Violent Behaviors in African American Young Adults

    Cleopatra Howard Caldwell;Laura P. Kohn-Wood;Karen H. Schmeelk-Cone;Tabbye M. Chavous

  • Empowerment theory for rehabilitation research: Conceptual and methodological issues.

    Marc A. Zimmerman;Seth Warschausky

Frequent Co-Authors

Rebecca M. Cunningham
Rebecca M. Cunningham University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Maureen A. Walton
Maureen A. Walton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Cleopatra H. Caldwell
Cleopatra H. Caldwell University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
José A. Bauermeister
José A. Bauermeister University of Pennsylvania
Stephen T. Chermack
Stephen T. Chermack University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Frederic C. Blow
Frederic C. Blow University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Shervin Assari
Shervin Assari Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science
Alison L. Miller
Alison L. Miller University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brenda M. Booth
Brenda M. Booth University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Daniel J. Kruger
Daniel J. Kruger University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and flexible career pathways. For those interested in combining psychological knowledge with hands-on community impact, social work is a popular adjoining field. Many students choose to pursue online social work degrees due to their affordability and accessible coursework.

It's important to compare programs across regions. For example, you can discover affordable social work programs in Washington, D.C. or explore affordable social work degrees in the West, both of which are suited to students seeking cost-effective routes to advancement.

Beyond affordability, many students are interested in highly regarded programs by location. Options like popular social work degrees in Arizona and popular social work degrees in Duluth provide recognized training that prepares graduates for meaningful careers in counseling, case management, school psychology, and more.

Whether your goal is affordability or specialization, there are numerous online pathways to help you launch a rewarding career related to psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Marc A. Zimmerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles