World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
5382
World Ranking
6660
National Ranking
527

Mark Lintermans publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Lintermans sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 152 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark Lintermans D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Lintermans sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Lintermans is affiliated with the University of Canberra in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research encompasses multiple subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling, and Aquatic Science.

The scientist's work focuses on several core topics:

  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

Mark Lintermans has authored significant papers, including:

  • Impact of 2019-2020 mega-fires on Australian fauna habitat, 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • One-quarter of freshwater fauna threatened with extinction, 2025, Nature
  • Fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages reveal extensive degradation of the world's rivers, 2022, Global Change Biology
  • The conservation impacts of ecological disturbance: Time-bound estimates of population loss and recovery for fauna affected by the 2019-2020 Australian megafires, 2022, Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • Rapid assessment of the biodiversity impacts of the 2019-2020 Australian megafires to guide urgent management intervention and recovery and lessons for other regions, 2021, Diversity and Distributions

Their published work frequently appears in venues such as Biological Conservation, Marine and Freshwater Research, Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Frequent collaborators in their research include John C. Z. Woinarski, Sarah Legge, Nick S. Whiterod, David G. Chapple, and Stephen T. Garnett. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary engagement within ecology and conservation science fields.

Best Publications

  • Impact of 2019–2020 mega-fires on Australian fauna habitat

    Michelle Ward;Ayesha I. T. Tulloch;Ayesha I. T. Tulloch;James Q. Radford;Brooke A. Williams

  • Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples.

    Rheyda Hinlo;Dianne Gleeson;Mark Lintermans;Elise Furlan

  • Fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin: an introductory guide

    Unknown

  • Human‐assisted dispersal of alien freshwater fish in Australia

    Mark Lintermans

  • Severe consequences of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of an endangered Australian freshwater fish: A call for assisted gene flow

    Alexandra Pavlova;Luciano Bellagamba Beheregaray;Rhys Coleman;Dean M Gilligan

  • Climate change and its implications for Australia's freshwater fish

    John R. Morrongiello;John R. Morrongiello;John R. Morrongiello;Stephen J. Beatty;James C. Bennett;James C. Bennett;David A. Crook;David A. Crook

  • One-quarter of freshwater fauna threatened with extinction

    Unknown

  • An environmental DNA-based method for monitoring spawning activity: a case study, using the endangered Macquarie perch (Macquaria australasica)

    Jonas Bylemans;Jonas Bylemans;Elise M. Furlan;Elise M. Furlan;Christopher M. Hardy;Prudence McGuffie;Prudence McGuffie

  • Fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages reveal extensive degradation of the world's rivers

    Unknown

  • Recolonization by the mountain galaxias Galaxias olidus of a montane stream after the eradication of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss

    Mark Lintermans

  • The conservation impacts of ecological disturbance: Time‐bound estimates of population loss and recovery for fauna affected by the 2019–2020 Australian megafires

    Unknown

  • A strategy to rehabilitate fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin, south-eastern Australia

    John D. Koehn;Mark Lintermans

  • The effectiveness of non-native fish removal techniques in freshwater ecosystems: a systematic review

    Trina Rytwinski;Jessica J. Taylor;Lisa A. Donaldson;J. Robert Britton

  • Continental-scale assessment reveals inadequate monitoring for threatened vertebrates in a megadiverse country

    Benjamin Scheele;Sarah Legge;Sarah Legge;Wade Blanchard;Stephen Garnett

  • Rapid assessment of the biodiversity impacts of the 2019–2020 Australian megafires to guide urgent management intervention and recovery and lessons for other regions

    Sarah Legge;Sarah Legge;John C.Z. Woinarski;Ben C. Scheele;Stephen T. Garnett

  • How to ensure threatened species monitoring leads to threatened species conservation

    Natasha M. Robinson;Ben C. Scheele;Sarah Legge;Darren M. Southwell

  • Preventing and controlling non-native species invasions to bend the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss

    Unknown

  • Twenty-five essential research questions to inform the protection and restoration of freshwater biodiversity

    Meagan Harper;Hebah S. Mejbel;Dylan Longert;Robin Abell

  • Alien salmonids in Australia: Impediments to effective impact management, and future directions

    Jean E. Jackson;Tarmo A. Raadik;Mark Lintermans;Michael Hammer

  • Big trouble for little fish: Identifying Australian freshwater fishes in imminent risk of extinction

    Mark Lintermans;Hayley M. Geyle;Stephen Beatty;Culum Brown

  • Monitoring riverine fish communities through eDNA metabarcoding: determining optimal sampling strategies along an altitudinal and biodiversity gradient

    Jonas Bylemans;Dianne M. Gleeson;Mark Lintermans;Christopher M. Hardy

  • The Asian fish tapeworm, Bothriocephalus acheilognathi, in Australian freshwater fishes.

    A. D. M. Dove;T. H. Cribb;S. P. Mockler;M. Lintermans

  • Local stream habitat variables predicted from catchment scale characteristics are useful for predicting fish distribution

    James Mugodo;Mark James Kennard;Peter Liston;Sue Nichols

  • Identifying the Influence of Channel Morphology on Physical Habitat Availability for Native Fish: Application to the Two-spined Blackfish (Gadopsis bispinosus) in the Cotter River, Australia.

    Ian Maddock;Martin Thoms;Katarina Jonson;Fiona Dyer

  • Conservation and Management

    Mark Lintermans

  • A Strategy to Rehabilitate Fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin, South-Eastern Australia

    Mark Lintermans

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah Legge
Sarah Legge Australian National University
Mark J. Kennard
Mark J. Kennard Griffith University
John C. Z. Woinarski
John C. Z. Woinarski Charles Darwin University
Stephen T. Garnett
Stephen T. Garnett Charles Darwin University
Peter J. Unmack
Peter J. Unmack University of Canberra
David B. Lindenmayer
David B. Lindenmayer Australian National University
Dianne M. Gleeson
Dianne M. Gleeson University of Canberra
Richard P. Duncan
Richard P. Duncan University of Canberra
Christopher J. Fulton
Christopher J. Fulton Australian National University
Ben C. Scheele
Ben C. Scheele Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens diverse academic and career opportunities. Many students pivot into healthcare, discovering unique pathways in nursing and advanced practice. For those considering clinical careers, understanding psych np salary by state is crucial for evaluating long-term prospects and planning your education.

Flexibility is another advantage of online programs. If you’re interested in entering nursing quickly, you might wonder how to become a nurse practitioner in the shortest time possible. Accelerated programs can help you reach your career goals faster while you build on your undergraduate foundations in biology or ecology.

Popular choices include the fastest rn to bsn program online for registered nurses looking to advance, as well as asn to np (ADN to MSN bridge programs), which let you transition from an associate degree in nursing to advanced nursing practice.

These flexible study options allow you to tailor a career path that aligns with your passion for science, whether you continue in research or step into clinical roles.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Lintermans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles