World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dianne M. Gleeson

Dianne M. Gleeson

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
4351
World Ranking
7633
National Ranking
593

Dianne M. Gleeson publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianne M. Gleeson sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Dianne M. Gleeson D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianne M. Gleeson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dianne M. Gleeson is affiliated with the University of Canberra in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a pronounced focus on the subfields of Ecology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Ecological Modeling.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Identification and Quantification in Food, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Genetic Diversity and Population Structure, and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior.

Dianne M. Gleeson has published in a range of journals and venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Environmental DNA
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • New Zealand Journal of Zoology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Genome Biology and Evolution

Their recent papers include:

  • Genomic Tools in Biological Invasions: Current State and Future Frontiers (2023, Genome Biology and Evolution)
  • Improving the detection of rare native fish species in environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys (2021, Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems)
  • Detection of Khapra Beetle Environmental DNA Using Portable Technologies in Australian Biosecurity (2022, Frontiers in Insect Science)
  • Considerations for future environmental DNA accreditation and proficiency testing schemes (2021, Environmental DNA)
  • Sucked in by eDNA - a promising tool for complementing riverine assessment of freshwater fish communities in Aotearoa New Zealand (2021, New Zealand Journal of Zoology)

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Alejandro Trujillo-González
  • Elise M. Furlan
  • Sam Godwin
  • Jack Rojahn
  • Jonas Bylemans

Best Publications

  • Methods to maximise recovery of environmental DNA from water samples.

    Rheyda Hinlo;Dianne Gleeson;Mark Lintermans;Elise Furlan

  • A framework for estimating the sensitivity of eDNA surveys.

    Elise M. Furlan;Dianne Gleeson;Christopher M. Hardy;Christopher M. Hardy;Richard P. Duncan

  • Ecdysozoan Mitogenomics: Evidence for a Common Origin of the Legged Invertebrates, the Panarthropoda

    Omar Rota-Stabelli;Ehsan Kayal;Dianne Gleeson;Jennifer Daub

  • An environmental DNA-based method for monitoring spawning activity: a case study, using the endangered Macquarie perch (Macquaria australasica)

    Jonas Bylemans;Jonas Bylemans;Elise M. Furlan;Elise M. Furlan;Christopher M. Hardy;Prudence McGuffie;Prudence McGuffie

  • Does Size Matter? An Experimental Evaluation of the Relative Abundance and Decay Rates of Aquatic Environmental DNA.

    Jonas Bylemans;Elise M. Furlan;Dianne M. Gleeson;Christopher M. Hardy

  • Effect of Vegetation Matrix on Animal Dispersal: Genetic Evidence from a Study of Endangered Skinks

    Oliver Berry;Mandy D. Tocher;Dianne M. Gleeson;Stephen D. Sarre

  • Relationship between avian malaria distribution and an exotic invasive mosquito in New Zealand

    D. M. Tompkins;D. M. Gleeson

  • Toward an ecoregion scale evaluation of eDNA metabarcoding primers: A case study for the freshwater fish biodiversity of the Murray-Darling Basin (Australia).

    Jonas Bylemans;Jonas Bylemans;Dianne M. Gleeson;Dianne M. Gleeson;Christopher M. Hardy;Christopher M. Hardy;Elise Furlan;Elise Furlan

  • A performance evaluation of targeted eDNA and eDNA metabarcoding analyses for freshwater fishes

    Jonas Bylemans;Jonas Bylemans;Dianne M. Gleeson;Dianne M. Gleeson;Richard P. Duncan;Christopher M. Hardy;Christopher M. Hardy

  • Environmental DNA monitoring and management of invasive fish: comparison of eDNA and fyke netting

    Rheyda Hinlo;Elise Furlan;Lara Suitor;Dianne Gleeson

  • Incorporating genotype uncertainty into mark-recapture-type models for estimating abundance using DNA samples.

    Janine A. Wright;Richard J. Barker;Matthew R. Schofield;Alain C. Frantz

  • Support for vicariant origins of the New Zealand Onychophora

    Julia Allwood;Julia Allwood;Dianne Gleeson;Georg Mayer;Georg Mayer;Savel Daniels

  • Multiple Mutations and Gene Duplications Conferring Organophosphorus Insecticide Resistance Have Been Selected at the Rop-1 Locus of the Sheep Blowfly, Lucilia cuprina

    Richard D. Newcomb;Dianne M. Gleeson;Catherine G. Yong;Robyn J. Russell

  • Cannabinoid receptors in invertebrates.

    J. M. McPARTLAND;J. Agraval;D. Gleeson;K. Heasman

  • Genetic variation, population structure and cryptic species within the black mudfish, Neochanna diversus, an endemic galaxiid from New Zealand

    D. M. Gleeson;R. L. J. Howitt;N. Ling

  • Reinvasion by ship rats (Rattus rattus) of forest fragments after eradication

    Carolyn M. King;John G. Innes;Dianne M. Gleeson;Neil Fitzgerald

  • Phylogenetic Relationships among Onychophora from Australasia Inferred from the Mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I Gene

    D.M. Gleeson;D.M. Rowell;N.N. Tait;D.A. Briscoe

  • Phylogeography of the spotted skink (Oligosoma lineoocellatum) and green skink (O. chloronoton) species complex (Lacertilia: Scincidae) in New Zealand reveals pre-Pleistocene divergence.

    Stephanie N.J. Greaves;David G. Chapple;Dianne M. Gleeson;Charles H. Daugherty

  • Monitoring riverine fish communities through eDNA metabarcoding: determining optimal sampling strategies along an altitudinal and biodiversity gradient

    Jonas Bylemans;Dianne M. Gleeson;Mark Lintermans;Christopher M. Hardy

  • A simple and effective method for obtaining mammal DNA from faeces

    Ana Ramón-Laca;Laura Soriano;Dianne Gleeson;José Antonio Godoy

  • Performance of eDNA assays to detect and quantify an elusive benthic fish in upland streams

    Rheyda Hinlo;Mark Lintermans;Dianne Gleeson;Ben Broadhurst

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen D. Sarre
Stephen D. Sarre University of Canberra
Thomas R. Buckley
Thomas R. Buckley Landcare Research
Richard P. Duncan
Richard P. Duncan University of Canberra
Mark Lintermans
Mark Lintermans University of Canberra
David G. Chapple
David G. Chapple Monash University
Charles H. Daugherty
Charles H. Daugherty Victoria University of Wellington
Lee F. Skerratt
Lee F. Skerratt University of Melbourne
Richard D. Newcomb
Richard D. Newcomb Plant & Food Research
Richard Speare
Richard Speare James Cook University
Daniel M. Tompkins
Daniel M. Tompkins Landcare Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider a career in Ecology and Evolution, exploring related online degrees and specialized pathways can open up new professional opportunities—many with flexible, accelerated programs. For those interested in understanding behavior and the broader ecological impact of human activity, an accelerated masters in psychology can be an excellent option. These programs often enable you to complete your graduate studies faster while gaining insights relevant to both environmental science and human dynamics.

For individuals driven by a desire to provide support and guidance, the fastest online counseling degree programs offer a quick route into mental health and community-oriented professions. Other options, like a how much does a forensic psychologist make degree, can introduce you to careers at the intersection of psychology, law, and investigative sciences—a valuable perspective useful for public health and environmental justice roles.

Those passionate about early intervention and education may pursue a masters in child psychology online, equipping you with skills to support youth in both clinical and ecological settings. Each pathway can enhance your impact as a future leader in ecology, helping bridge science, society, and individual well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Dianne M. Gleeson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles