World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard D. Newcomb

Richard D. Newcomb

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
9701
World Ranking
17973
National Ranking
48

Richard D. Newcomb publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Newcomb sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 141 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard D. Newcomb D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Newcomb sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard D. Newcomb is affiliated with Plant & Food Research in New Zealand and has contributed to the field of Agricultural and Biological Sciences through 13 publications. Their research mainly covers subfields including Insect Science, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their scholarly work spans several main topics, such as:

  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Insect Pheromone Research and Control
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • Melissa Jordan
  • Thomas R. Buckley
  • Victoria Twort
  • Clive Stone
  • April A. Jauhal

Notable publication venues featuring their research include:

  • Nature
  • Molecular Ecology Resources
  • Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

The following papers represent some of their recent research contributions:

  • The tuatara genome reveals ancient features of amniote evolution, 2020, Nature
  • Assessing genome assembly quality prior to downstream analysis: N50 versus BUSCO, 2021, Molecular Ecology Resources
  • Sex pheromone receptors of the light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana, support a second major pheromone receptor clade within the Lepidoptera, 2021, Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Flexibility of the petunia strigolactone receptor DAD2 promotes its interaction with signaling partners, 2020, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Relationship Between Longitudinal Coping Strategies and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia, 2022, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Best Publications

  • DAD2 Is an α/β Hydrolase Likely to Be Involved in the Perception of the Plant Branching Hormone, Strigolactone

    Cyril Hamiaux;Revel S.M. Drummond;Bart J. Janssen;Susan E. Ledger

  • A single amino acid substitution converts a carboxylesterase to an organophosphorus hydrolase and confers insecticide resistance on a blowfly

    R. D. Newcomb;P. M. Campbell;D. L. Ollis;E. Cheah

  • A genomics approach reveals that aroma production in apple is controlled by ethylene predominantly at the final step in each biosynthetic pathway

    Robert J. Schaffer;Ellen N. Friel;Edwige J.F. Souleyre;Karen Bolitho

  • RNA interference in the light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) induced by double-stranded RNA feeding.

    CT Turner;MW Davy;Robin MacDiarmid;KM Plummer

  • Biochemical Genetics and Genomics of Insect Esterases

    John Graham Oakeshott;Charles Claudianos;Peter M Campbell;Richard David Newcomb

  • Drosophila odorant receptors are novel seven transmembrane domain proteins that can signal independently of heterotrimeric G proteins.

    Renee Smart;Aidan Kiely;Aidan Kiely;Morgan Beale;Ernesto Vargas

  • Analyses of Expressed Sequence Tags from Apple

    Richard D. Newcomb;Ross N. Crowhurst;Andrew P. Gleave;Erik H.A. Rikkerink

  • Analysis of expressed sequence tags from Actinidia: Applications of a cross species EST database for gene discovery in the areas of flavor, health, color and ripening

    Ross N Crowhurst;Andrew P Gleave;Elspeth A MacRae;Charles Ampomah-Dwamena

  • Two different amino acid substitutions in the ali-esterase, E3, confer alternative types of organophosphorus insecticide resistance in the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina

    Peter M Campbell;Richard D Newcomb;Robyn J Russell;John G Oakeshott

  • Amplification of DNA from preserved specimens shows blowflies were preadapted for the rapid evolution of insecticide resistance

    C. J. Hartley;R. D. Newcomb;R. J. Russell;C. G. Yong

  • An alcohol acyl transferase from apple (cv. Royal Gala), MpAAT1, produces esters involved in apple fruit flavor

    Edwige J. F. Souleyre;David R. Greenwood;Ellen N. Friel;Sakuntala Karunairetnam

  • Female-biased expression of odourant receptor genes in the adult antennae of the silkworm, Bombyx mori.

    Kevin W Wanner;Kevin W Wanner;Alisha Rebecca Anderson;Stephen C Trowell;D A Theilmann

  • Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment.

    Alexei J. Drummond;Richard D. Newcomb;Richard D. Newcomb;Thomas R. Buckley;Thomas R. Buckley;Dong Xie

  • Insect olfaction and the evolution of receptor tuning

    Martin N. Andersson;Christer Löfstedt;Richard D. Newcomb

  • The tuatara genome reveals ancient features of amniote evolution

    Neil J. Gemmell;Kim Rutherford;Stefan Prost;Marc Tollis;Marc Tollis

  • A Mendelian Trait for Olfactory Sensitivity Affects Odor Experience and Food Selection

    Sara R. Jaeger;Jeremy F. McRae;Christina M. Bava;Michelle K. Beresford

  • The acetylcholinesterase gene and organophosphorus resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina

    Zhenzhong Chen;Richard Newcomb;Emma Forbes;John McKenzie

  • Niche construction initiates the evolution of mutualistic interactions

    Claudia C. Buser;Richard D. Newcomb;Richard D. Newcomb;Anne C. Gaskett;Matthew R. Goddard

  • Odorant receptors from the light brown apple moth (Epiphyas postvittana) recognize important volatile compounds produced by plants.

    Melissa D. Jordan;Melissa D. Jordan;Alisha Anderson;Doreen Begum;Doreen Begum;Colm Carraher

  • Analysis of expressed sequence tags from Actinidia : Applications of a cross species EST database for gene discovery in the areas of flavor, health, color and ripening

    R.N. Crowhurst;A.P. Gleave;E.A. MacRae;C. Ampomah-Dwamena

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Buckley
Thomas R. Buckley Landcare Research
John G. Oakeshott
John G. Oakeshott Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Ross N. Crowhurst
Ross N. Crowhurst Plant & Food Research
Robyn J. Russell
Robyn J. Russell Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Mark I. Stevens
Mark I. Stevens South Australian Museum
Neil J. Gemmell
Neil J. Gemmell University of Otago
Christer Löfstedt
Christer Löfstedt Lund University
Nicola J. Nelson
Nicola J. Nelson Victoria University of Wellington
Kim M. Plummer
Kim M. Plummer La Trobe University
William A. Laing
William A. Laing Plant & Food Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to diverse career paths in healthcare and life sciences. One growing field is medical coding, a key part of health information management. If you’re curious about earning potential, you can learn more about what is medical coding salary and see how this career compares to others in the medical field.

Medical billing and coding roles are seeing consistent demand in the healthcare industry. For those considering job security, the current medical billing and coding job outlook remains positive, with numerous opportunities to work remotely or in hospitals and clinics.

If you’re interested in leadership roles or data management, earning a bachelor's degree health information management online equips you with skills in organizing, analyzing, and safeguarding patient information—qualities highly valued in modern healthcare settings.

Additionally, for those passionate about wellness and dietary science, an online masters degree in nutrition provides flexibility and advanced expertise for careers in research, clinical practice, or public health education.

Best Scientists Citing Richard D. Newcomb

Trending Scientists