World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
5110
World Ranking
7571
National Ranking
586

Alison J. King publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison J. King sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 101 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Alison J. King D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison J. King sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alison J. King is affiliated with Charles Darwin University in Australia and has contributed extensively to environmental science, focusing in particular on nature and landscape conservation, aquatic science, global and planetary change, ecology, and general health professions.

Their research centers primarily on fish ecology and management studies, fish biology and ecology studies, and fish biology, ecology, and behavior. Additional focus areas include marine and fisheries research, fire effects on ecosystems, aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, and water resources management and optimization.

King has published frequently in several academic venues, including:

  • Fisheries Research
  • Journal of Fish Biology
  • Marine and Freshwater Research
  • River Research and Applications
  • Ecology of Freshwater Fish

Notable recent papers by King include:

  • The conservation impacts of ecological disturbance: Time-bound estimates of population loss and recovery for fauna affected by the 2019-2020 Australian megafires (2022, Global Ecology and Biogeography)
  • Animal population decline and recovery after severe fire: Relating ecological and life history traits with expert estimates of population impacts from the Australian 2019-20 megafires (2023, Biological Conservation)
  • Towards vibrant fish populations and sustainable fisheries that benefit all: learning from the last 30 years to inform the next 30 years (2023, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries)
  • Faster juvenile growth promotes earlier sex change in a protandrous hermaphrodite (barramundi Lates calcarifer) (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • Substantial intraspecific trait variation across a hydrological gradient in northern Australian fishes (2022, Ecosphere)

King has collaborated extensively with several frequent coauthors, including:

  • David A. Crook
  • Dion Wedd
  • Thor Saunders
  • Osmar J. Luiz
  • Brendan J. Adair

Best Publications

  • Fish, Flows and Flood Plains: Links between Freshwater Fishes and their Environment in the Murray-Darling River System, Australia

    Paul Humphries;Alison J. King;John D. Koehn

  • Fish recruitment on floodplains: the roles of patterns of flooding and life history characteristics

    Alison J King;Paul Humphries;Phillip S Lake

  • River regulation and fish larvae: variation through space and time

    Paul Humphries;Paul Humphries;Luciano G. Serafini;Alison J. King;Alison J. King

  • Environmental flow enhances native fish spawning and recruitment in the Murray River, Australia

    Alison Jane King;Zeb Tonkin;John Mahoney

  • Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment

    Alison Jane King;K Ward;P O'connor;David Green

  • The influence of spatial scale and habitat arrangement on diel patterns of habitat use by two lowland river fishes

    David A. Crook;David A. Crook;Alistar I. Robertson;Alison J. King;Alison J. King;Paul Humphries;Paul Humphries

  • Short-term effects of a prolonged blackwater event on aquatic fauna in the Murray River, Australia: considerations for future events

    Alison Jane King;Alison Jane King;Zeb Tonkin;J Lieshcke

  • Ontogenetic patterns of habitat use by fishes within the main channel of an Australian floodplain river

    Alison King

  • Dry season habitat use of fishes in an Australian tropical river

    K. Keller;Q. Allsop;J. Brim Box;D. Buckle

  • Experimental manipulations of the biomass of introduced carp (Cyprinus carpio) in billabongs. I. Impacts on water-column properties

    A. J. King;A. I. Robertson;M. R. Healey

  • Using abiotic drivers of fish spawning to inform environmental flow management

    Alison Jane King;Alison Jane King;Daniel Gwinn;Zeb Tonkin;John Mahoney

  • Confronting the risks of large-scale invasive species control.

    R. Keller Kopf;Dale G. Nimmo;Paul Humphries;Lee J. Baumgartner

  • Potential ecological effects of water extraction in small, unregulated streams

    S. F. McKay;A. J. King

  • Impacts of drought and predicted effects of climate change on fish growth in temperate Australian lakes

    John R. Morrongiello;John R. Morrongiello;David A. Crook;Alison J. King;David S. L. Ramsey

  • Ecological risks and opportunities from engineered artificial flooding as a means of achieving environmental flow objectives

    Nick Bond;Justin Costelloe;Alison King;Danielle Warfe

  • Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows

    Alison J. King;Alison J. King;Ben Gawne;Leah Beesley;Leah Beesley;John D. Koehn

  • Ontogenetic dietary shifts of fishes in an Australian floodplain river

    Alison Jane King;Alison Jane King

  • Experimental manipulations of the biomass of introduced carp (Cyprinus carpio) in billabongs. II. Impacts on benthic properties and processes.

    A. I. Robertson;M. R. Healey;A. J. King

  • Density and distribution of potential prey for larval fish in the main channel of a floodplain river: pelagic versus epibenthic meiofauna

    Alison King

  • Flows for native fish in the Murray‐Darling Basin: lessons and considerations for future management

    John D. Koehn;Alison J. King;Leah Beesley;Craig Copeland

  • Riverscape recruitment: A conceptual synthesis of drivers of fish recruitment in rivers

    Paul Humphries;Alison J King;Nicole McCasker;R. Keller Kopf

  • Legacies, lags and long-term trends: Effective flow restoration in a changed and changing world

    Ross M. Thompson;Alison J. King;Richard M. Kingsford;Ralph Mac Nally;Ralph Mac Nally

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Crook
David A. Crook Charles Darwin University
Michael M. Douglas
Michael M. Douglas University of Western Australia
Paul Humphries
Paul Humphries Charles Sturt University
Ross M. Thompson
Ross M. Thompson University of Canberra
Nick Bond
Nick Bond La Trobe University
Julian D. Olden
Julian D. Olden University of Washington
Lorenzo Vilizzi
Lorenzo Vilizzi University of Łódź
Mark J. Kennard
Mark J. Kennard Griffith University
Ralph Charles Mac Nally
Ralph Charles Mac Nally University of Canberra
Alistar Robertson
Alistar Robertson University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in ecology and evolution can open doors to diverse online degrees and fast-tracked pathways in other science-based fields, such as nursing. Many students interested in biology or environmental science choose accelerated routes to healthcare professions. For instance, the accelerated bsn programs for non nurses offer an efficient way to transition into nursing without prior experience in the field.

Online options have made becoming a nurse more accessible, with programs like the fastest rn to bsn program allowing students to upskill quickly. For those considering advanced practice roles, understanding how many years to become a nurse practitioner is an important factor in planning your educational journey.

Career outcomes in the healthcare sector, such as psychiatric nursing, remain highly desirable. Knowing how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make can also help inform your choice of specialization. Exploring these related fields and degree options can complement an education in ecology and evolution by expanding career opportunities and professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing Alison J. King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles