World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lorenzo Vilizzi

Lorenzo Vilizzi

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
4965
World Ranking
6696
National Ranking
20

Lorenzo Vilizzi publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorenzo Vilizzi sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 164 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Lorenzo Vilizzi D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorenzo Vilizzi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lorenzo Vilizzi is affiliated with the University of Łódź in Poland and contributes extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research encompasses multiple subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Aquatic Science, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a focus on invasive species, aquatic ecology, and risk assessment related to non-native organisms. Key papers include:

  • "A global-scale screening of non-native aquatic organisms to identify potentially invasive species under current and future climate conditions," 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science," 2024, Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • "Speaking their language - Development of a multilingual decision-support tool for communicating invasive species risks to decision makers and stakeholders," 2020, Environmental Modelling & Software
  • "A protocol for screening potentially invasive non-native species using Weed Risk Assessment-type decision-support tools," 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Risk screening of the potential invasiveness of non-native freshwater fishes in the River Ob basin (West Siberian Plain, Russia)," 2020, Regional Environmental Change

Their work covers numerous main topics such as Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Fish Biology and Ecology, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Marine Ecology and Invasive Species, Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies, and Species Distribution and Climate Change.

Frequent co-authors associated with Lorenzo Vilizzi include:

  • Gordon H. Copp
  • Ali Serhan Tarkan
  • Marina Piria
  • Baran Yoğurtçuoğlu
  • Hui Wei

Their publications appear regularly in venues such as OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) from La Trobe University, NeoBiota, Fisheries Management and Ecology, Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, and The Science of The Total Environment.

Best Publications

  • Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater fishes.

    Gordon H. Copp;Lorenzo Vilizzi;John Mumford;Gemma V. Fenwick

  • Pathways of ornamental and aquarium fish introductions into urban ponds of Epping Forest (London, England): the human vector*

    G. H. Copp;K. J. Wesley;L. Vilizzi

  • Experimental Evidence from Causal Criteria Analysis for the Effects of Common Carp Cyprinus carpio on Freshwater Ecosystems: A Global Perspective

    L. Vilizzi;A. S. Tarkan;G. H. Copp

  • Development of a generic decision-support tool for identifying potentially invasive aquatic taxa: AS-ISK

    Gordon H. Copp;Lorenzo Vilizzi;Hannah Tidbury;Paul D. Stebbing

  • Age and growth of the common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in the River Murray, Australia: validation, consistency of age interpretation, and growth models

    Lorenzo Vilizzi;Keith F. Walker

  • Calibration of FI-ISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater invertebrates.

    Elena Tricarico;Lorenzo Vilizzi;Francesca Gherardi;Gordon H. Copp;Gordon H. Copp

  • A global-scale screening of non-native aquatic organisms to identify potentially invasive species under current and future climate conditions

    Lorenzo Vilizzi;Gordon H. Copp;Jeffrey E. Hill;Boris Adamovich

  • Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science

    Unknown

  • Effectiveness of FISK, an Invasiveness Screening Tool for Non‐Native Freshwater Fishes, to Perform Risk Identification Assessments in the Iberian Peninsula

    David Almeida;Filipe Ribeiro;Pedro M. Leunda;Lorenzo Vilizzi

  • The common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in the Mediterranean region : origin, distribution, economic benefits, impacts and management.

    Lorenzo Vilizzi

  • Tackling invasive alien species in Europe II: threats and opportunities until 2020

    Marina Piria;Gordon H. Copp;Gordon H. Copp;Gordon H. Copp;Jaimie T. A. Dick;Aljoša Duplić

  • Seasonal and diel patterns in the migrations of fishes between a river and a floodplain tributary

    A. D. Nunn;G. H. Copp;G. H. Copp;L. Vilizzi;M. G. Carter

  • Revisions of the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for its application in warmer climatic zones, with particular reference to peninsular Florida.

    Larry L. Lawson;Jeffrey E. Hill;Lorenzo Vilizzi;Scott Hardin

  • The demography of introduction pathways, propagule pressure and occurrences of non-native freshwater fish in England

    G. H. Copp;G. H. Copp;L. Vilizzi;R. E. Gozlan

  • A global review and meta-analysis of applications of the freshwater Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit

    Lorenzo Vilizzi;Gordon H. Copp;Boris Adamovich;David Almeida

  • Leaving the fish bowl: the ornamental trade as a global vector for freshwater fish invasions

    Farrah T. Chan;Stephen J. Beatty;Allan S. Gilles;Jeffrey E. Hill

  • Assessing variation in suitability curves and electivity profiles in temporal studies of fish habitat use

    Lorenzo Vilizzi;Gordon H. Copp;Jean-Marc Roussel

  • Age, growth and cohort composition of 0+ carp in the River Murray, Australia

    L. Vilizzi

  • A protocol for screening potentially invasive non-native species using Weed Risk Assessment-type decision-support toolkits.

    Unknown

  • Speaking their language – development of a multilingual decision-support tool for communicating invasive species risks to decision makers and stakeholders

    Gordon H. Copp;Lorenzo Vilizzi;Hui Wei;Shan Li

  • Identification of potentially invasive freshwater fishes, including translocated species, in Turkey using the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK)

    Ali Serhan Tarkan;Lorenzo Vilizzi;Nildeniz Top;Fitnat Güler Ekmekçi

  • The Onset of the Juvenile Period in Carp, Cyprinus Carpio: a Literature Survey

    Lorenzo Vilizzi;Keith F. Walker

  • First Application of FISK, the Freshwater Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit, in Northern Europe: Example of Southern Finland

    Riikka Puntila;Lorenzo Vilizzi;Maiju Lehtiniemi;Gordon H. Copp;Gordon H. Copp;Gordon H. Copp

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon H. Copp
Gordon H. Copp Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
Elena Tricarico
Elena Tricarico University of Florence
Alison J. King
Alison J. King Charles Darwin University
Rodolphe E. Gozlan
Rodolphe E. Gozlan University of Montpellier
Agnese Marchini
Agnese Marchini University of Pavia
Rob S. E. W. Leuven
Rob S. E. W. Leuven Radboud University
Keith F. Walker
Keith F. Walker University of Adelaide
Darren C. J. Yeo
Darren C. J. Yeo National University of Singapore
Maiju Lehtiniemi
Maiju Lehtiniemi Finnish Environment Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Alongside a focus on Ecology and Evolution, many students consider healthcare pathways due to high demand and flexible study options. Online nursing degrees, in particular, offer adaptable routes for those switching or advancing careers.

Programs like the fastest rn to bsn program online allow registered nurses to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing in as few as six months. This rapid track appeals to those wanting to increase their credentials and earning potential efficiently. Others might explore rn to np programs which bridge the gap from registered nurse (RN) to nurse practitioner (NP) roles.

For those curious about advancing to an NP role, understanding how long to become a nurse practitioner is crucial. Some pathways allow for licensure in just a few years, especially for those with prior clinical experience.

Finally, as you plan your future, consider how specialization can influence earnings. Exploring the dnp pmhnp salary will help you understand nationwide salary trends for advanced practice nurses and how location impacts compensation.

Best Scientists Citing Lorenzo Vilizzi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles