World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10511 9834 462 448 155 4919

Jessica J. Asscher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jessica J. Asscher between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jessica J. Asscher published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2011. 13 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2011. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 10 publications
2001 2025

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jessica J. Asscher: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 2
2006 3
2007 5
2008 9
2009 2
2010 10
2011 18
2012 17
2013 13
2014 17
2015 7
2016 12
2017 5
2018 13
2019 6
2020 6
2021 8
2022 7
2023 16
2024 3
2025 10
Total 191
Download as CSV

Jessica J. Asscher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jessica J. Asscher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 155 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 155
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jessica J. Asscher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jessica J. Asscher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jessica J. Asscher is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research encompasses a broad range of topics primarily within psychology and social sciences, with an emphasis on adolescent development, mental health, and social behavior.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Their subfields of study cover:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Genetics

Jessica J. Asscher's research topics focus significantly on:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Their recent publications highlight a focus on adolescent psychological stress, radicalization, and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Notable papers include:

  • Can Schools Reduce Adolescent Psychological Stress? A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of School-Based Intervention Programs (2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence)
  • Risk factors for (violent) radicalization in juveniles: A multilevel meta-analysis (2020, Aggression and Violent Behavior)
  • Trajectories of adolescent perceived stress and symptoms of depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • The effects of school-based interventions on physiological stress in adolescents: A meta-analysis (2021, Stress and Health)
  • Prepandemic Risk Factors of COVID-19-Related Concerns in Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021, Journal of Research on Adolescence)

Frequently collaborating co-authors associated with Jessica J. Asscher include:

  • Hanneke E. Creemers (24 co-authored papers)
  • Hanne M. Duindam (12 co-authored papers)
  • Amanda W. G. van Loon (9 co-authored papers)
  • Simone Vogelaar (9 co-authored papers)
  • Nadira Saab (8 co-authored papers)

Their work is often published in notable journals and venues such as:

  • International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Aggression and Violent Behavior
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Best Publications

  • The effectiveness of Multisystemic Therapy (MST): A meta-analysis

    Trudy van der Stouwe;Jessica J. Asscher;Geert Jan J.M. Stams;Maja Deković

  • Students' and teachers' cognitions about good teachers

    J.J. Beishuizen;E. Hof;C.M. Van Putten;S. Bouwmeester

  • Germs and angels: the role of testimony in young children's ontology

    Paul L. Harris;Elisabeth S. Pasquini;Suzanne Duke;Jessica J. Asscher

  • The relationship between juvenile psychopathic traits, delinquency and (violent) recidivism: A meta‐analysis

    Jessica J. Asscher;Eveline S. van Vugt;Geert Jan J.M. Stams;Maja Deković

  • Mean-level personality development across childhood and adolescence: a temporary defiance of the maturity principle and bidirectional associations with parenting.

    Alithe L. Van den Akker;Maja Dekovic;Jessica J. Asscher;Peter Prinzie

  • Tracing changes in families who participated in the home-start parenting program: parental sense of competence as mechanism of change.

    Maja Deković;Jessica J. Asscher;Jo Hermanns;Ellen Reitz

  • Aftercare programs for reducing recidivism among juvenile and young adult offenders: A meta-analytic review

    Chrissy James;Geert Jan J.M. Stams;Jessica J. Asscher;Anne Katrien De Roo

  • Gender differences in the impact of abuse and neglect victimization on adolescent offending behavior

    Jessica J. Asscher;Claudia E. Van der Put;Geert Jan J. M. Stams

  • Practitioner Review: Effective Ingredients of Prevention Programs for Youth at Risk of Persistent Juvenile Delinquency : Recommendations for Clinical Practice

    Sanne L. A. de Vries;Machteld Hoeve;Mark Assink;Geert Jan J. M. Stams

  • Within-intervention change: mediators of intervention effects during multisystemic therapy.

    Maja Deković;Jessica J Asscher;Willeke A Manders;Pier J M Prins

  • Effects of early prevention programs on adult criminal offending: A meta-analysis

    Maja Deković;Meike I. Slagt;Jessica J. Asscher;Leonieke Boendermaker

  • Psychopathy as Predictor and Moderator of Multisystemic Therapy Outcomes among Adolescents Treated for Antisocial Behavior

    Willeke A. Manders;Maja Deković;Jessica J. Asscher;Peter H. van der Laan

  • The effectiveness of institutional youth care over the past three decades: A meta-analysis

    J.J.W. De Swart;H. Van den Broek;G.J.J.M. Stams;J.J. Asscher

  • A meta-analysis of intensive family preservation programs: placement prevention and improvement of family functioning

    Channa M.W. Al;Geert Jan J.M. Stams;Miranda S. Bek;Esther M. Damen

  • A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of multisystemic therapy in the Netherlands: post-treatment changes and moderator effects

    Jessica J. Asscher;Maja Deković;Willeke A. Manders;Peter H. van der Laan

  • Toddlers' temperament profiles: stability and relations to negative and positive parenting.

    Alithe L. van den Akker;Maja Deković;Peter Prinzie;Jessica J. Asscher

  • Basic Trust: An Attachment-Oriented Intervention Based on Mind-Mindedness in Adoptive Families.

    Cristina Colonnesi;Inge B. Wissink;Marc J. Noom;Jessica J. Asscher

  • Risk factors for (violent) radicalization in juveniles: A multilevel meta-analysis

    Julie Emmelkamp;Jessica J. Asscher;Jessica J. Asscher;Inge B. Wissink;Geert Jan J.M. Stams

  • The association between psychopathy and delinquency in juveniles: A three-level meta-analysis

    Yoni Geerlings;Jessica J. Asscher;Jessica J. Asscher;Geert-Jan J.M. Stams;Mark Assink

  • Personality types in childhood: relations to latent trajectory classes of problem behavior and overreactive parenting across the transition into adolescence

    Alithe L. Van den Akker;Maja Dekovic;Jessica J. Asscher;Rebecca L. Shiner

  • The effectiveness of family group conferencing in youth care : A meta-analysis

    Sharon Dijkstra;Hanneke E. Creemers;Jessica J. Asscher;Maja Deković

Frequent Co-Authors

Geert Jan J. M. Stams
Geert Jan J. M. Stams University of Amsterdam
Maja Deković
Maja Deković Utrecht University
Machteld Hoeve
Machteld Hoeve University of Amsterdam
Peter Prinzie
Peter Prinzie Erasmus University Rotterdam
Pier J. M. Prins
Pier J. M. Prins University of Amsterdam
P. Michiel Westenberg
P. Michiel Westenberg Leiden University
John C. Gibbs
John C. Gibbs The Ohio State University
Julian F. Thayer
Julian F. Thayer University of California, Irvine
Paul L. Harris
Paul L. Harris Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of rewarding career options. Many students choose to advance into specialized fields, such as speech-language pathology. This career is in high demand and typically requires a master's degree in a related field, along with certification and licensure depending on the state.

If you are considering a future as a speech-language pathologist, it’s important to understand state-specific requirements. For example, North Dakota slp certification requirements emphasize graduate study and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, those interested in becoming a speech therapist in Ohio must fulfill educational, exam, and licensure criteria.

Other states like Oklahoma and Oregon have their own processes. To learn more, review the slp requirements in Oklahoma and slp requirements in Oregon. Many universities also offer online psychology degrees, allowing you to balance your studies with work or family commitments as you prepare for these rewarding pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Jessica J. Asscher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles