World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8829 8245 385 371 171 6601

Pier J. M. Prins publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pier J. M. Prins between 1985 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pier J. M. Prins published across 38 years, from 1985 to 2022, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2012. 1 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2012. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1985 2022

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pier J. M. Prins: publications per year, 1985 to 2022
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 1
1989 3
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 4
1995 6
1996 3
1997 6
1998 6
1999 6
2000 6
2001 5
2002 7
2003 5
2004 3
2005 9
2006 4
2007 9
2008 10
2009 4
2010 9
2011 12
2012 15
2013 12
2014 6
2015 12
2016 12
2017 3
2018 3
2019 4
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 191
Download as CSV

Pier J. M. Prins publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pier J. M. Prins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 171 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 171
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Pier J. M. Prins D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pier J. M. Prins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pier J. M. Prins is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields, notably veterinary science and environmental science, with a particular focus on veterinary orthopedics and neurology, turtle biology and conservation, and veterinary equine medical research.

The scientist's publication record includes contributions to specific subfields such as small animals, nature and landscape conservation, and equine studies. Their work is disseminated primarily through academic journals, with at least one publication appearing in the Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine.

Among recent scholarly works is a paper titled RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF REFRACTIVE OSTEOMYELITIS AND INFECTIOUS ARTHRITIS IN THE FLIPPERS OF SEALS IN THE NETHERLANDS, published in 2020 within the Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine.

Collaboration forms a meaningful aspect of their research, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Anna Salazar-Casals
  • Klaas W. Marck
  • Tijmen de Jong
  • James M. Collins
  • Joost Dorgelo

Their scientific interests collectively cover:

  • Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
  • Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Veterinary Equine Medical Research

Research outputs reflect investigations relevant to animal health and conservation, emphasizing surgical treatment methodologies and disease management in wildlife and domesticated animals.

Overall, Pier J. M. Prins' work integrates veterinary practice with environmental considerations, contributing to both clinical veterinary knowledge and conservation science through a variety of studies and interdisciplinary approaches.

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of methylphenidate, psychosocial treatments and their combination in school-aged children with ADHD: A meta-analysis

    S. van der Oord;P.J.M. Prins;J. Oosterlaan;P.M.G. Emmelkamp

  • Social incompetence in children with ADHD: Possible moderators and mediators in social-skills training

    Gerly M. de Boo;Pier J.M. Prins

  • Childhood dental fear in the Netherlands: prevalence and normative data.

    Maaike Ten Berge;Jaap S. J. Veerkamp;Johan Hoogstraten;Pier J. M. Prins

  • Improving executive functioning in children with ADHD: training multiple executive functions within the context of a computer game. A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial

    Sebastiaan Dovis;Saskia Van der Oord;Reinout W. Wiers;Pier J. M. Prins

  • Does computerized working memory training with game elements enhance motivation and training efficacy in children with ADHD

    Pier J.M. Prins;Sebastiaan Dovis;Albert Ponsioen;Esther ten Brink

  • Can Motivation Normalize Working Memory and Task Persistence in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder? The Effects of Money and Computer-Gaming

    Sebastiaan Dovis;Saskia Van der Oord;Saskia Van der Oord;Reinout W. Wiers;Pier J. M. Prins

  • A psychometric evaluation of the social skills rating system in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    S. van der Oord;J.A.J. van der Meulen;P.J.M. Prins;J. Oosterlaan

  • Working memory and cognitive flexibility-training for children with an autism spectrum disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

    Marieke de Vries;Pier J.M. Prins;Ben A. Schmand;Hilde M. Geurts

  • A Pilot Study of the Efficacy of a Computerized Executive Functioning Remediation Training With Game Elements for Children With ADHD in an Outpatient Setting: Outcome on Parent- and Teacher-Rated Executive Functioning and ADHD Behavior

    S. van der Oord;S. van der Oord;A. J.G. B. Ponsioen;H. M. Geurts;E. L. Ten Brink

  • The Dental Subscale of the Children's Fear Survey Schedule: a factor analytic study in The Netherlands.

    M. Ten Berge;J. Hoogstraten;J. Hoogstraten;J. S. J. Veerkamp;P. J. M. Prins

  • Within-intervention change: mediators of intervention effects during multisystemic therapy.

    Maja Deković;Jessica J Asscher;Willeke A Manders;Pier J M Prins

  • Visual search attentional bias modification reduced social phobia in adolescents

    E.L. De Voogd;R.W. Wiers;P.J.M. Prins;E. Salemink

  • Cognitive Bias Modification for adolescents with substance use problems – Can serious games help?

    Wouter J. Boendermaker;Pier J.M. Prins;Reinout W. Wiers

  • Sensitivity of Gray’s behavioral inhibition system in clinically anxious and non-anxious children and adolescents

    Leentje Vervoort;Lidewij H. Wolters;Sanne M. Hogendoorn;Else de Haan

  • The association between parenting stress, depressed mood and informant agreement in ADHD and ODD

    S. van der Oord;P.J.M. Prins;J. Oosterlaan;P.M.G. Emmelkamp

  • Psychopathy as Predictor and Moderator of Multisystemic Therapy Outcomes among Adolescents Treated for Antisocial Behavior

    Willeke A. Manders;Maja Deković;Jessica J. Asscher;Peter H. van der Laan

  • The relationship between negative emotions and acute subjective and objective symptoms of childhood asthma

    S. Rietveld;P.J.M. Prins

  • Ten Ways to Improve the Use of Statistical Mediation Analysis in the Practice of Child and Adolescent Treatment Research

    Marija Maric;Reinout W. Wiers;Pier J. M. Prins

  • Braingame Brian: Toward an Executive Function Training Program with Game Elements for Children with ADHD and cognitive control problems

    Pier J M Prins;Esther Ten Brink;Sebastiaan Dovis;Albert Ponsioen

  • Reducing Aggressive Behavior in Boys With a Social Cognitive Group Treatment: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial.

    Teun G van Manen;Pier J.M. Prins;Paul M.G. Emmelkamp

  • Cognitive change and enhanced coping: missing mediational links in cognitive behavior therapy with anxiety-disordered children.

    Pier J. M. Prins;Thomas H. Ollendick

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul M. G. Emmelkamp
Paul M. G. Emmelkamp University of Amsterdam
Jaap Oosterlaan
Jaap Oosterlaan University of Amsterdam
Hilde M. Geurts
Hilde M. Geurts University of Amsterdam
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Jessica J. Asscher
Jessica J. Asscher University of Amsterdam
Maja Deković
Maja Deković Utrecht University
Catharina A. Hartman
Catharina A. Hartman University Medical Center Groningen
Maaike H. Nauta
Maaike H. Nauta University of Groningen
Thomas H. Ollendick
Thomas H. Ollendick Virginia Tech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, especially in mental health counseling. Many students pursue online degrees in Psychology, Counseling, or Social Work, which provide flexibility and access to accredited programs from across the country. These degrees can be essential steps toward meeting licensing and certification requirements for aspiring counselors.

Depending on where you plan to practice, you’ll need to meet specific state or city regulations. For example, if you want to become a mental health counselor in Lincoln, it’s important to learn about local education and licensure standards. Additionally, different areas may require unique credentials and supervised fieldwork experience, such as those outlined in the Long Beach mental health counselor certification requirements and the Los Angeles mental health counselor education requirements.

Before you start, research the mental health counselor requirements in Louisville and other regions you’re interested in. This will help ensure your educational choices align with your career goals. Exploring these pathways early on will give you a clear roadmap toward a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Pier J. M. Prins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles