World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Slovenia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 50 2105 1937 3 3 180 10922

Katarina Čufar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Katarina Čufar between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Katarina Čufar published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2022. 24 of the 332 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2022. 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 9 publications
1986 2025

332 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Katarina Čufar: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 2
1987 0
1988 0
1989 3
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 2
1995 8
1996 2
1997 4
1998 5
1999 4
2000 8
2001 2
2002 4
2003 10
2004 17
2005 8
2006 9
2007 10
2008 18
2009 16
2010 7
2011 11
2012 8
2013 13
2014 12
2015 17
2016 14
2017 11
2018 10
2019 10
2020 18
2021 11
2022 20
2023 11
2024 15
2025 9
Total 332
Download as CSV

Katarina Čufar publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katarina Čufar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 176–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 180 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126 180
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Katarina Čufar D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katarina Čufar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122 50
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Slovenia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Slovenia Leader Award

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Archaeology

Katarina Čufar focuses on Cambium, Xylem, Botany, Ecology and Growing season. Katarina Čufar studied Cambium and Abies alba that intersect with Toxicology and Crown. In her study, Fagus sylvatica and Beech is inextricably linked to Phenology, which falls within the broad field of Xylem.

Her study involves Phloem and Tracheid, a branch of Botany. Her study in the field of Dendroclimatology also crosses realms of Tree. Her Horticulture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Dendrochronology and Mediterranean climate, Aleppo Pine.

Her most cited work include:

  • Old World megadroughts and pluvials during the Common Era (271 citations)
  • A synthesis of radial growth patterns preceding tree mortality (210 citations)
  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access (179 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Katarina Čufar mainly focuses on Archaeology, Botany, Dendrochronology, Xylem and Cambium. Her work on Tracheid, Abies alba and Vascular cambium as part of general Botany study is frequently linked to Altitude, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. Her research in Dendrochronology tackles topics such as Mediterranean climate which are related to areas like Pinus .

The Xylem study combines topics in areas such as Beech, Fagus sylvatica, Growing season, Picea abies and Phloem. Her studies deal with areas such as Ultrastructure and Ecology, Temperate climate, Phenology as well as Cambium. Her work carried out in the field of Ecology brings together such families of science as Northern Hemisphere and Scots pine.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Archaeology (30.23%)
  • Botany (27.44%)
  • Dendrochronology (25.58%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Dendrochronology (25.58%)
  • Fagus sylvatica (17.21%)
  • Beech (20.00%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her primary areas of investigation include Dendrochronology, Fagus sylvatica, Beech, Cambium and Mediterranean climate. Katarina Čufar combines subjects such as Genealogy, Aleppo Pine, Abies alba and Chronology with her study of Dendrochronology. In her research on the topic of Fagus sylvatica, Climatology is strongly related with Growing season.

She has researched Beech in several fields, including Swietenia macrophylla and Pinus oocarpa. Her Cambium research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Phloem and Pinus . Her Xylem study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Productivity and Picea abies.

Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access (179 citations)
  • Low growth resilience to drought is related to future mortality risk in trees (46 citations)
  • High-Throughput DNA sequencing of ancient wood (34 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Archaeology

Katarina Čufar mainly investigates Climate change, Ecology, Xylem, Productivity and Fagus sylvatica. Her Climate change research integrates issues from Forest dynamics and Phenology. Her Vegetation and Range study, which is part of a larger body of work in Ecology, is frequently linked to DNA sequencing, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Katarina Čufar works in the field of Xylem, namely Cambium. Her studies in Productivity integrate themes in fields like Dendrochronology, Growing season, Botany and Arbutus unedo. Katarina Čufar has included themes like Picea abies and Temperate climate in her Fagus sylvatica study.

Best Publications

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • A synthesis of radial growth patterns preceding tree mortality

    Maxime Cailleret;Steven Jansen;Elisabeth M. R. Robert;Elisabeth M. R. Robert;Lucía Desoto

  • Low growth resilience to drought is related to future mortality risk in trees

    Lucía DeSoto;Lucía DeSoto;Maxime Cailleret;Maxime Cailleret;Maxime Cailleret;Frank Sterck;Steven Jansen

  • Woody biomass production lags stem-girth increase by over one month in coniferous forests

    Henri E. Cuny;Henri E. Cuny;Cyrille B. K. Rathgeber;Cyrille B. K. Rathgeber;David Frank;Patrick Fonti

  • Climate-change-driven growth decline of European beech forests

    Unknown

  • Oaks, tree-rings and wooden cultural heritage: a review of the main characteristics and applications of oak dendrochronology in Europe

    Kristof Haneca;Katarina Čufar;Hans Beeckman

  • Quantitative Wood Anatomy—Practical Guidelines

    Georg Von Arx;Alan Crivellaro;Angela Luisa Prendin;Katarina Čufar

  • Pattern of xylem phenology in conifers of cold ecosystems at the Northern Hemisphere

    Sergio Rossi;Sergio Rossi;Tommaso Anfodillo;Katarina Čufar;Henri E. Cuny

  • Bioclimatology of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in the Eastern Alps: spatial and altitudinal climatic signals identified through a tree‐ring network

    Alfredo Di Filippo;Franco Biondi;Katarina Čufar;Martín De Luis

  • Tree-ring variation, wood formation and phenology of beech (Fagus sylvatica) from a representative site in Slovenia, SE Central Europe

    Katarina Čufar;Peter Prislan;Martin de Luis;Jozica Gričar

  • Effect of Local Heating and Cooling on Cambial Activity and Cell Differentiation in the Stem of Norway Spruce (Picea abies)

    Jožica Gričar;Martin Zupančič;Katarina Čufar;Gerald Koch

  • Seasonal Dynamics of Wood Formation in Pinus Halepensis from Dry and Semi-Arid Ecosystems in Spain

    Martín de Luis;Jožica Gričar;Katarina Čufar;José Raventós

  • Phenological variation in xylem and phloem formation in Fagus sylvatica from two contrasting sites

    Peter Prislan;Jožica Gričar;Martin de Luis;Kevin T. Smith

  • Photoperiod and temperature as dominant environmental drivers triggering secondary growth resumption in Northern Hemisphere conifers

    Jian-Guo Huang;Qianqian Ma;Sergio Rossi;Sergio Rossi;Franco Biondi

  • Regular cambial activity and xylem and phloem formation in locally heated and cooled stem portions of Norway spruce

    Jožica Gričar;Martin Zupančič;Katarina Čufar;Primož Oven

  • Age dependence of xylogenesis and its climatic sensitivity in Smith fir on the south-eastern Tibetan Plateau

    Xiaoxia Li;Eryuan Liang;Jožica Gričar;Peter Prislan

  • Early-warning signals of individual tree mortality based on annual radial growth

    Maxime Cailleret;Maxime Cailleret;Vasilis Dakos;Steven Jansen;Elisabeth M.R. Robert;Elisabeth M.R. Robert

  • Growth patterns as indicators of impending tree death in silver fir

    Christof Bigler;Jožica Gričar;Harald Bugmann;Katarina Čufar

  • A meta-analysis of cambium phenology and growth: linear and non-linear patterns in conifers of the northern hemisphere

    Sergio Rossi;Tommaso Anfodillo;Katarina Čufar;Henri E. Cuny

  • Climate factors promoting intra-annual density fluctuations in Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) from semiarid sites

    Martin de Luis;Klemen Novak;Klemen Novak;Klemen Novak;José Raventós;Jožica Gričar

  • Size mediated climate-growth relationships in Pinus halepensis and Pinus pinea

    Martín De Luis;Klemen Novak;Klemen Novak;Klemen Novak;Katarina Čufar;José Raventós

Frequent Co-Authors

Jožica Gričar
Jožica Gričar Slovenian Forestry Institute
Martin de Luis
Martin de Luis University of Zaragoza
Sergio Rossi
Sergio Rossi Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
Eryuan Liang
Eryuan Liang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Harri Mäkinen
Harri Mäkinen Natural Resources Institute Finland
Walter Oberhuber
Walter Oberhuber University of Innsbruck
Veronica De Micco
Veronica De Micco University of Naples Federico II
Giovanna Battipaglia
Giovanna Battipaglia University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
J. Julio Camarero
J. Julio Camarero Spanish National Research Council
Patrick Fonti
Patrick Fonti Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Katarina Čufar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles