World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
49
Citations
8583
World Ranking
4053
National Ranking
126

Antonio Gazol publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Gazol sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 185 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Antonio Gazol D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Gazol sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonio Gazol is a researcher affiliated with the Spanish National Research Council in Spain. Their scientific contributions primarily focus on environmental and earth sciences, addressing key issues related to climate impacts on forest ecosystems and plant responses to drought and water availability.

Their main fields of study include Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with notable subfield expertise in Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science, Plant Science, and Ecology.

The researcher's work extensively covers topics such as Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Tree-ring Climate Responses, Forest Ecology and Management, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, and Horticultural and Viticultural Research.

Among their frequent co-authors are J. Julio Camarero, Cristina Valeriano, Michele Colangelo, Éster González de Andrés, and Raúl Sánchez-Salguero, indicating active collaboration within their scientific network.

Antonio Gazol's publications often appear in venues such as Forests, Forest Ecology and Management, The Science of The Total Environment, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, and Global Change Biology.

Representative papers authored or co-authored by this researcher include:

  • Compound climate events increase tree drought mortality across European forests (2021), The Science of The Total Environment
  • Drought legacies are short, prevail in dry conifer forests and depend on growth variability (2020), Journal of Ecology

Other significant recent works related to similar research fields but authored by collaborators include:

  • Widespread spring phenology effects on drought recovery of Northern Hemisphere ecosystems (2023), Nature Climate Change
  • Climate sensitivity and drought seasonality determine post-drought growth recovery of Quercus petraea and Quercus robur in Europe (2021), The Science of The Total Environment
  • Wood density and hydraulic traits influence species' growth response to drought across biomes (2022), Global Change Biology

This body of work contributes to a deeper understanding of how changing climatic conditions influence forest dynamics, tree mortality, and recovery patterns, emphasizing drought and water stress factors.

Best Publications

  • To die or not to die: early warnings of tree dieback in response to a severe drought

    J. Julio Camarero;J. Julio Camarero;Antonio Gazol;Gabriel Sangüesa-Barreda;Jonàs Oliva

  • Forest resilience to drought varies across biomes

    Antonio Gazol;Jesus Julio Camarero;Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano;Raúl Sánchez-Salguero;Raúl Sánchez-Salguero

  • Plant height and hydraulic vulnerability to drought and cold

    Mark E. Olson;Diana Soriano;Julieta A. Rosell;Tommaso Anfodillo

  • Impacts of droughts on the growth resilience of Northern Hemisphere forests

    A. Gazol;J. J. Camarero;W. R. L. Anderegg;W. R. L. Anderegg;S. M. Vicente-Serrano

  • Compound climate events increase tree drought mortality across European forests.

    Antonio Gazol;J. Julio Camarero

  • Diverse relationships between forest growth and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index at a global scale

    Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano;J. Julio Camarero;José M. Olano;Natalia Martín-Hernández

  • Distinct effects of climate warming on populations of silver fir (Abies alba) across Europe

    Antonio Gazol;J. Julio Camarero;Emilia Gutiérrez;Ionel Popa

  • Assessing forest vulnerability to climate warming using a process-based model of tree growth: bad prospects for rear-edges.

    Raúl Sánchez-Salguero;Raúl Sánchez-Salguero;Jesus Julio Camarero;Emilia Gutiérrez;Fidel González Rouco

  • Forest Growth Responses to Drought at Short- and Long-Term Scales in Spain: Squeezing the Stress Memory from Tree Rings

    J. Julio Camarero;Antonio Gazol;Gabriel Sangüesa-Barreda;Alejandro Cantero

  • Functional diversity enhances silver fir growth resilience to an extreme drought

    Antonio Gazol;J. Julio Camarero

  • Wood anatomy and carbon-isotope discrimination support long-term hydraulic deterioration as a major cause of drought-induced dieback.

    Elena Pellizzari;J. Julio Camarero;Antonio Gazol;Gabriel Sangüesa-Barreda

  • Climate sensitivity and drought seasonality determine post-drought growth recovery of Quercus petraea and Quercus robur in Europe.

    Arun K. Bose;Daniel Scherrer;J. Julio Camarero;Daniel Ziche

  • Aboveground carbon storage is driven by functional trait composition and stand structural attributes rather than biodiversity in temperate mixed forests recovering from disturbances

    Zuoqiang Yuan;Shaopeng Wang;Arshad Ali;Antonio Gazol

  • Aleppo pine forests from across Spain show drought-induced growth decline and partial recovery

    Antonio Gazol;Montserrat Ribas;Emilia Gutiérrez;J. Julio Camarero

  • Wood density and hydraulic traits influence species’ growth response to drought across biomes

    Unknown

  • Resist, recover or both? Growth plasticity in response to drought is geographically structured and linked to intraspecific variability in Pinus pinaster.

    Raúl Sánchez‐Salguero;Raúl Sánchez‐Salguero;J. Julio Camarero;Vicente Rozas;Mar Génova

  • Drought legacies are short, prevail in dry conifer forests and depend on growth variability

    Antonio Gazol;Jesús Julio Camarero;Raul Sánchez-Salguero;Raul Sánchez-Salguero;Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano

  • Soil nutrient content influences the abundance of soil microbes but not plant biomass at the small-scale.

    Kadri Koorem;Antonio Gazol;Maarja Öpik;Mari Moora

  • Disparate effects of global‐change drivers on mountain conifer forests: warming‐induced growth enhancement in young trees vs. CO2 fertilization in old trees from wet sites

    J. Julio Camarero;Antonio Gazol;Juan Diego Galván;Gabriel Sangüesa‐Barreda

  • Attributing forest responses to global-change drivers: Limited evidence of a CO2-fertilization effect in Iberian pine growth

    J. Julio Camarero;Antonio Gazol;Jacques C. Tardif

  • Past logging, drought and pathogens interact and contribute to forest dieback

    Gabriel Sangüesa-Barreda;J. Julio Camarero;Jonàs Oliva;Fernando Montes

  • Size Matters a Lot: Drought-Affected Italian Oaks Are Smaller and Show Lower Growth Prior to Tree Death

    Michele Colangelo;Jesús J. Camarero;Marco Borghetti;Antonio Gazol

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Julio Camarero
J. Julio Camarero Spanish National Research Council
Gabriel Sangüesa-Barreda
Gabriel Sangüesa-Barreda University of Valladolid
Raúl Sánchez-Salguero
Raúl Sánchez-Salguero Pablo de Olavide University
Emilia Gutiérrez
Emilia Gutiérrez University of Barcelona
Juan Carlos Linares
Juan Carlos Linares Pablo de Olavide University
Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano
Sergio M. Vicente-Serrano Spanish National Research Council
Zhanqing Hao
Zhanqing Hao Northwestern Polytechnical University
Xugao Wang
Xugao Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
José Miguel Olano
José Miguel Olano University of Valladolid
Martin de Luis
Martin de Luis University of Zaragoza

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse educational and career possibilities. With the growing popularity of online learning, students can now easily combine their studies in natural sciences with other fields for a more versatile career path. For example, many universities offer cheap online interdisciplinary studies degree options, which allow you to blend ecology with subjects like public health, data science, or policy.

If you’re interested in visual communication within science, pursuing the best 2 year graphic design degree online could strengthen your ability to present research through compelling visuals or educational materials. Additionally, a graduate degree in history helps contextualize ecological changes; consider a masters in history to build expertise in environmental history or conservation trends.

For those passionate about knowledge management or environmental archives, library science is another valuable option. To see whether this fits your goals, learn what schools offer library science degrees in the USA. Combining ecology with these related degrees can help you shape a unique, impactful career.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Gazol

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles