World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6548 6089 1052 978 155 4111

Crawford Moodie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Crawford Moodie between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Crawford Moodie published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2021. 23 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2021. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 6 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
2005 2025

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Crawford Moodie: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 2
2007 1
2008 6
2009 9
2010 8
2011 6
2012 9
2013 7
2014 7
2015 9
2016 9
2017 4
2018 14
2019 15
2020 12
2021 18
2022 10
2023 0
2024 11
2025 12
Total 170
Download as CSV

Crawford Moodie publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Crawford Moodie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 155 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 155
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Crawford Moodie D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Crawford Moodie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Crawford Moodie is affiliated with the University of Stirling in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on public health, with a strong emphasis on tobacco control and behavioral health interventions.

The main fields of study for Moodie include Medicine, with a particular concentration on subfields such as Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology, Marketing, and Social Psychology.

Moodie's work covers topics related to Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends, Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, and Safety Warnings and Signage.

Frequent coauthors of Moodie include:

  • Nathan Critchlow
  • Catherine Best
  • Martine Stead
  • Daniel Jones
  • Linda Bauld

Their publications regularly appear in venues such as:

  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Tobacco Control
  • Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
  • European Journal of Public Health
  • Addiction Research & Theory

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Crawford Moodie include:

  • Plain tobacco packaging: progress, challenges, learning and opportunities (2022), Tobacco Control
  • Consumer Response to Standardized Tobacco Packaging in the United Kingdom: A Synthesis of Evidence from Two Systematic Reviews (2021), Risk Management and Healthcare Policy

Other relevant papers from Moodie's frequent coauthors, related to public health and consumer behavior, have been published in venues such as Public Health, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), and Addiction Research & Theory.

This body of work reflects a sustained investigation into health messaging, regulatory packaging policies, and consumer perceptions related to tobacco and alcohol consumption, situated within a wider public health and behavioral science framework.

Best Publications

  • Plain tobacco packaging: A systematic review

    Crawford Moodie;Martine Stead;Linda Bauld;Ann McNeill

  • A longitudinal study of policy effect (smoke-free legislation) on smoking norms: ITC Scotland/United Kingdom

    Abraham Brown;Crawford Moodie;Gerard Hastings

  • The impact of alcohol marketing on youth drinking behaviour: a two-stage cohort study.

    Rachael Gordon;Anne Marie MacKintosh;Crawford Moodie

  • Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study

    Crawford Moodie;Anne Marie Mackintosh;Gerard B. Hastings;Allison Ford

  • Assessing the cumulative impact of alcohol marketing on young people's drinking: cross sectional data findings

    Ross Gordon;Fiona Harris;Anne Marie MacKintosh;Crawford Moodie

  • Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies

    Martine Stead;Crawford Moodie;Kathryn Angus;Linda Bauld

  • Gambling Marketing from 2014 to 2018: a Literature Review

    Philip W. S. Newall;Crawford Moodie;Gerda Reith;Martine Stead

  • A comparison of the autonomic arousal of frequent, infrequent and non-gamblers while playing fruit machines

    Crawford Moodie;Frances Finnigan

  • Cigarette brands with flavour capsules in the filter: trends in use and brand perceptions among smokers in the USA, Mexico and Australia, 2012–2014

    James F Thrasher;Erika N Abad-Vivero;Crawford Moodie;Richard J O'Connor

  • Adolescents' response to text-only tobacco health warnings: results from the 2008 UK Youth Tobacco Policy Survey.

    Crawford Moodie;Anne Marie MacKintosh;David Hammond

  • The association between point-of-sale displays and youth smoking susceptibility

    Anne Marie MacKintosh;Crawford Moodie;Gerard Hastings

  • Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging

    Karine Gallopel-Morvan;Crawford Moodie;David Hammond;Figen Eker

  • Tobacco packaging as promotion

    Crawford Moodie;Gerard Hastings

  • Alcohol marketing and young people's drinking: What the evidence base suggests for policy

    Ross Gordon;Gerard Hastings;Crawford Moodie

  • Are all cigarettes just the same? Female’s perceptions of slim, coloured, aromatized and capsule cigarettes

    Crawford Moodie;Allison Ford;Anne Marie MacKintosh;Richard Purves

  • Adolescents' responses to the promotion and flavouring of e-cigarettes.

    Allison Ford;Anne Marie MacKintosh;Linda Bauld;Crawford Moodie

  • Young adult women smokers' response to using plain cigarette packaging: a naturalistic approach.

    Crawford S Moodie;Anne Marie Mackintosh

  • Tobacco marketing awareness on youth smoking susceptibility and perceived prevalence before and after an advertising ban

    Crawford Moodie;Anne Marie MacKintosh;Abraham Brown;Gerard B Hastings

  • Making the Pack the Hero, Tobacco Industry Response to Marketing Restrictions in the UK: Findings from a Long-Term Audit

    Crawford Moodie;Gerard B. Hastings

  • Prevalence and correlates of youth gambling in Scotland

    Crawford Moodie;Frances Finnigan

  • Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey

    Allison Ford;Anne Marie MacKintosh;Crawford Moodie;Sol Richardson

  • Young people’s perceptions of cigarette packaging and plain packaging: an online survey

    Crawford Moodie;Allison Ford;Anne Marie Mackintosh;Gerard Hastings

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne Marie MacKintosh
Anne Marie MacKintosh University of Stirling
Gerard Hastings
Gerard Hastings University of Stirling
Linda Bauld
Linda Bauld University of Edinburgh
Martine Stead
Martine Stead University of Stirling
Ann McNeill
Ann McNeill University of Adelaide
James F. Thrasher
James F. Thrasher University of South Carolina
David Hammond
David Hammond University of Waterloo
Janet Hoek
Janet Hoek University of Otago
K. Michael Cummings
K. Michael Cummings Medical University of South Carolina
John Britton
John Britton University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can lead to rewarding and diverse career options. If flexibility and speed are important, you may want to consider online accelerated MSW programs, which can lead to careers in social work, policy, and advocacy much faster than traditional routes.

Mental health careers are also highly sought-after. For those interested in psychology, pursuing the quickest psychology degree pathways online can help you enter the field rapidly while balancing other responsibilities.

If your goal is to become a licensed counselor, it’s essential to choose reputable educational options like cacrep accredited online masters counseling programs, which ensure quality and eligibility for licensure.

Another in-demand specialty is in family dynamics—pursuing a marriage and family therapist degree online offers an affordable and flexible route toward a meaningful profession supporting couples and families.

Best Scientists Citing Crawford Moodie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles