World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 67 921 803 172 154 341 13283

Anna B Gilmore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anna B Gilmore between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anna B Gilmore published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 13.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2020. 10 of the 385 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2020. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

385 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anna B Gilmore: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 2
2001 11
2002 11
2003 9
2004 20
2005 8
2006 9
2007 9
2008 6
2009 8
2010 17
2011 9
2012 16
2013 27
2014 28
2015 16
2016 14
2017 6
2018 13
2019 10
2020 37
2021 29
2022 14
2023 27
2024 18
2025 9
2026 1
Total 385
Download as CSV

Anna B Gilmore publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna B Gilmore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 334–343 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 341 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69 341
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Anna B Gilmore D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna B Gilmore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51 67
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Anna B Gilmore is affiliated with the University of Bath in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on areas intersecting business, management, accounting, and medicine, with substantial contributions in subfields such as organizational behavior and human resource management, public health, environmental and occupational health, physiology, general health professions, and pharmacology.

Their scholarly output includes numerous publications in well-recognized academic journals. Frequent publication venues for their work include Tobacco Control, European Journal of Public Health, The Lancet, International Journal of Health Policy and Management, and BMJ Global Health.

Their research topics cover a wide range of issues, notably:

  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Pharmaceutical Industry and Healthcare
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Employment and Welfare Studies

Gilmore has collaborated extensively with a group of frequent co-authors, including Britta Matthes, Alice Fabbri, Mateusz Zatoński, Allen Gallagher, and J Robert Branston.

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Gilmore include:

  • Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health, 2023, The Lancet
  • Commercial determinants of health: future directions, 2023, The Lancet
  • The Science for Profit Model-How and why corporations influence science and the use of science in policy and practice, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Conceptualising commercial entities in public health: beyond unhealthy commodities and transnational corporations, 2023, The Lancet
  • Corporate Political Activity: Taxonomies and Model of Corporate Influence on Public Policy, 2023, International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Best Publications

  • Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health

    Unknown

  • Exposing and addressing tobacco industry conduct in low-income and middle-income countries

    Anna B Gilmore;Gary Fooks;Jeffrey Drope;Jeffrey Drope;Stella Aguinaga Bialous

  • The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR.

    Gary Fooks;Anna B. Gilmore;Jeff Collin;Chris Holden

  • Status of implementation of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in Ghana: a qualitative study

    Ellis Owusu-Dabo;Ellis Owusu-Dabo;Ann McNeill;Sarah Lewis;Anna Gilmore

  • How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review

    Emily Savell;Anna B. Gilmore;Gary Fooks

  • Globalization and infectious diseases, A review of the linkages

    L Saker;K Lee;B Cannito;A Gilmore

  • How does the alcohol industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic review

    Emily Savell;Gary Fooks;Anna B. Gilmore

  • The Policy Dystopia Model: An Interpretive Analysis of Tobacco Industry Political Activity.

    Selda Ulucanlar;Gary J. Fooks;Anna B. Gilmore

  • Prevalence of smoking in 8 countries of the former Soviet Union: results from the living conditions, lifestyles and health study.

    Anna Gilmore;Joceline Pomerleau;Martin McKee;Richard Rose

  • Determinants of and inequalities in self-perceived health in Ukraine.

    Anna B.C Gilmore;Martin McKee;Richard Rose

  • Short term impact of smoke-free legislation in England: retrospective analysis of hospital admissions for myocardial infarction

    Michelle Sims;Roy Maxwell;Linda Bauld;Anna Gilmore

  • What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies

    Katherine E Smith;Emily Savell;Anna B Gilmore;Anna B Gilmore

  • Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Policy Elites: An Analysis of Tobacco Industry Documents

    Gary J. Fooks;Anna B. Gilmore;Anna B. Gilmore;Katherine E. Smith;Jeff Collin

  • Public health, corporations and the New Responsibility Deal: promoting partnerships with vectors of disease?

    Anna B. Gilmore;Anna B. Gilmore;Anna B. Gilmore;Emily Savell;Emily Savell;Jeff Collin;Jeff Collin

  • Commercial determinants of health: future directions

    Unknown

  • Tobacco Industry Influence on Science and Scientists in Germany

    Thilo Grüning;Anna B. Gilmore;Martin McKee

  • Trends in the prevalence of smoking in Russia during the transition to a market economy

    Francesca Perlman;Martin Bobak;Anna Gilmore;Martin McKee

  • Understanding tobacco industry pricing strategy and whether it undermines tobacco tax policy: the example of the UK cigarette market.

    Anna B. Gilmore;Behrooz Tavakoly;Gordon Taylor;Howard Reed

  • E-cigarettes and equity: a systematic review of differences in awareness and use between sociodemographic groups

    Greg Hartwell;Sian Thomas;Matt Egan;Anna Gilmore

  • Moving East: how the transnational tobacco industry gained entry to the emerging markets of the former Soviet Union—part I: establishing cigarette imports

    Anna B Gilmore;M McKee

  • Environmental profile of a community's health (EPOCH): An instrument to measure environmental determinants of cardiovascular health in five countries

    Clara K. Chow;Clara K. Chow;Karen Lock;Manisha Madhavan;Daniel J. Corsi

  • Tobacco and transition: an overview of industry investments, impact and influence in the former Soviet Union

    A B Gilmore;M McKee

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin McKee
Martin McKee London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Jeff Collin
Jeff Collin University of Edinburgh
Ann McNeill
Ann McNeill University of Adelaide
Rosemary Hiscock
Rosemary Hiscock University of Bath
Katherine E. Smith
Katherine E. Smith University of Strathclyde
Sarah Lewis
Sarah Lewis University of Nottingham
John Britton
John Britton University of Nottingham
Kelley Lee
Kelley Lee Simon Fraser University
Carlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia University of Milan
Silvano Gallus
Silvano Gallus Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse, rewarding careers. Many students are now choosing flexible online degree options that allow them to balance study with work or family life.

For those interested in mental health fields, there are several paths to consider. Accredited online psychology degree programs help you build a strong foundation in human behavior, leading to careers in counseling, research, or education. If you're interested in becoming a counselor, consider reviewing cacrep accredited counseling programs, which meet high professional standards and open the way to licensure.

Individuals passionate about supporting couples and families can look into a marriage and family therapist degree. This pathway prepares you to address relationship challenges, making a tangible impact in communities.

Social work is another respected career option, and finding the easiest msw programs to get into can help you start your journey with less stress. Thorough research of each program's accreditation, costs, and professional requirements is vital.

Best Scientists Citing Anna B Gilmore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles