World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
13576
World Ranking
3434
National Ranking
37

Catholijn M. Jonker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catholijn M. Jonker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 600 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Catholijn M. Jonker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catholijn M. Jonker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2012 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Catholijn M. Jonker is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans a variety of fields, primarily within computer science and social sciences. The scientist's work encompasses multiple subfields including artificial intelligence, social psychology, management science and operations research, safety research, and sociology and political science.

Their principal research topics include:

  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Catholijn M. Jonker's recent publications illustrate these themes. Notable papers include:

  • "Model-based Reinforcement Learning: A Survey," 2023, published in Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
  • "A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence," 2020, published in Computer
  • "Meaningful human control: actionable properties for AI system development," 2022, published in AI and Ethics
  • "Model-based Reinforcement Learning: A Survey," 2020, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Reasoning about responsibility in autonomous systems: challenges and opportunities," 2022, published in AI & Society

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations
  • AI and Ethics
  • AI & Society
  • ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Pradeep K. Murukannaiah, Myrthe L. Tielman, Luciano Cavalcante Siebert, Enrico Liscio, and M. Birna van Riemsdijk, indicating interdisciplinary and sustained research partnerships.

Catholijn M. Jonker was recognized as a Member of the Academia Europaea in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Deliberative Normative Agents: Principles and Architecture.

    C. Castelfranchi;F. Dignum;C. M. Jonker;J. Treur

  • Model-based Reinforcement Learning: A Survey

    Thomas M. Moerland;Joost Broekens;Catholijn M. Jonker

  • Formal Analysis of Models for the Dynamics of Trust Based on Experiences

    Catholijn M. Jonker;Jan Treur

  • Coactive design: designing support for interdependence in joint activity

    Matthew Johnson;Jeffrey M. Bradshaw;Paul J. Feltovich;Catholijn M. Jonker

  • Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems

    Maria Gini;Onn Shehory;Takayuki Ito;Catholijn Jonker

  • A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence

    Zeynep Akata;Dan Balliet;Maarten de Rijke;Frank Dignum

  • A Language and Environment for Analysis of Dynamics by SimulaTiOn

    T. Bosse;C.M. Jonker;L. van der Meij;J. Treur

  • Compositional Verification of Multi-Agent Systems: a Formal Analysis of Pro-activeness and Reactiveness

    Catholijn M. Jonker;Jan Treur

  • GENIUS: AN INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENT FOR SUPPORTING THE DESIGN OF GENERIC AUTOMATED NEGOTIATORS

    Raz Lin;Sarit Kraus;Sarit Kraus;Tim Baarslag;Dmytro Tykhonov

  • Evaluating practical negotiating agents: Results and analysis of the 2011 international competition

    Tim Baarslag;Katsuhide Fujita;Enrico H. Gerding;Koen Hindriks

  • Emotion in reinforcement learning agents and robots: a survey

    Thomas M. Moerland;Joost Broekens;Catholijn M. Jonker

  • An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information

    Catholijn M. Jonker;Valentin Robu;Jan Treur

  • Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques

    Tim Baarslag;Mark J. Hendrikx;Koen V. Hindriks;Catholijn M. Jonker

  • Specification and Verification of Dynamics in Agent Models

    Tibor Bosse;Catholijn M. Jonker;Lourens Van Der Meij;Alexei Sharpanskykh

  • Shared Mental Models

    Catholijn M. Jonker;M. Birna van Riemsdijk;Bas Vermeulen

  • Principles of component-based design of intelligent agents

    Frances M. T. Brazier;Catholijn M. Jonker;Jan Treur

  • The first automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC 2010)

    Katsuhide Fujita;Reyhan Aydoğan;Tim Baarslag;Koen Hindriks

  • Compositional Design and Reuse of a Generic Agent Model .

    Frances M. T. Brazier;Catholijn M. Jonker;Jan Treur

  • An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation

    Catholijn M. Jonker;Jan Treur

  • LEADSTO: a language and environment for analysis of dynamics by simulation

    Tibor Bosse;Catholijn M. Jonker;Lourens van der Meij;Jan Treur

  • Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems

    Catholijn M. Jonker;Stacy Marsella;John Thangarajah;Karl Tuyls

  • Shared mental models: a conceptual analysis

    Catholijn M. Jonker;M. Birna van Riemsdijk;Bas Vermeulen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Treur
Jan Treur Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Koen V. Hindriks
Koen V. Hindriks Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Virginia Dignum
Virginia Dignum Umeå University
Frances M. T. Brazier
Frances M. T. Brazier Delft University of Technology
Frank Dignum
Frank Dignum Umeå University
Jeffrey M. Bradshaw
Jeffrey M. Bradshaw Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Sarit Kraus
Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University
Mehdi Dastani
Mehdi Dastani Utrecht University
Hans V. Westerhoff
Hans V. Westerhoff Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jacky L. Snoep
Jacky L. Snoep Stellenbosch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of career pathways and advanced degrees. Many prospective students explore online universities for affordable and flexible options to earn their bachelor’s degree, making education accessible anywhere in the world.

For those interested in fields closely related to computer science, it’s natural to ask, can you get an engineering degree online? The answer is yes—many accredited institutions now offer robust engineering programs entirely online, helping students build technical expertise without compromising on quality.

Pursuing leadership roles or business management after a tech degree is common. If this is your goal, check out affordable online executive mba programs that fit around your professional life, equipping you with essential business knowledge while you work.

Another emerging field is information management. Consider a library sciences degree if you’re interested in organizing and managing information—an area highly relevant to the digital age and computer science graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Catholijn M. Jonker

Trending Scientists