World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
14752
World Ranking
4491
National Ranking
2101

Jeffrey M. Bradshaw publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey M. Bradshaw sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 195 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jeffrey M. Bradshaw D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey M. Bradshaw sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeffrey M. Bradshaw is affiliated with the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition in the United States. Their research spans several areas within psychology, particularly social psychology, as well as management science and operations research, artificial intelligence, control and systems engineering, and safety research.

The scientist's work focuses on a range of topics including human-automation interaction and safety, complex systems and decision making, systems engineering methodologies and applications, ethics and social impacts of AI, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, adversarial robustness in machine learning, and multi-agent systems and negotiation.

Bradshaw has contributed to several recent publications. These include:

  • From Bench to Bedside: Implementing AI Ethics as Policies for AI Trustworthiness, 2024, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
  • Human-Agent Teamwork and Adjustable Autonomy in Practice, 2021, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Other papers related to the same field and venues, though not authored by Bradshaw, include:

  • Toward a Taxonomy of Teamwork Support to Help Inform Collaborative AI Efforts, 2025, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
  • In Memoriam Master of Complexity: Paul J. Feltovich August 2, 1947-January 21, 2025, 2025, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

Bradshaw frequently publishes in venues such as the Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University), and the Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making.

Collaboration is an integral part of their research with coauthors including:

  • Matthew Johnson
  • Michael J. Prietula
  • Larry Bunch
  • Edward L. Queen
  • Andrzej Uszok

The interdisciplinary nature of their studies is reflected in their engagement across various subfields and topics, bridging psychological insights with advanced technological and ethical questions related to artificial intelligence and systems engineering.

Best Publications

  • An introduction to software agents

    Jeffrey M. Bradshaw

  • Software agents

    Jeffrey M. Bradshaw

  • Ten challenges for making automation a "team player" in joint human-agent activity

    G. Klien;D.D. Woods;J.M. Bradshaw;R.R. Hoffman

  • Applying KAoS services to ensure policy compliance for semantic web services workflow composition and enactment

    Andrzej Uszok;Jeffrey M. Bradshaw;Renia Jeffers;Austin Tate

  • KAoS policy and domain services: toward a description-logic approach to policy representation, deconfliction, and enforcement

    A. Uszok;J. Bradshaw;R. Jeffers;N. Suri

  • Common Ground and Coordination in Joint Activity

    Gary Klein;Paul J. Feltovich;Jeffrey M. Bradshaw;David D. Woods

  • Semantic web languages for policy representation and reasoning: a comparison of KAoS, Rei, and Ponder

    Gianluca Tonti;Jeffrey M. Bradshaw;Renia Jeffers;Rebecca Montanari

  • KAoS: toward an industrial-strength open agent architecture

    Jeffrey M. Bradshaw;Stewart Dutfield;Pete Benoit;John D. Woolley

  • Expertise transfer and complex problems: using AQUINAS as a knowledge-acquisition workbench for knowledge-based systems

    John H. Boose;Jeffrey M. Bradshaw

  • Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints

    David H. Dodd;Jeffrey M. Bradshaw

  • Coactive design: designing support for interdependence in joint activity

    Matthew Johnson;Jeffrey M. Bradshaw;Paul J. Feltovich;Catholijn M. Jonker

  • KAoS policy management for semantic Web services

    A. Uszok;J.M. Bradshaw;M. Johnson;R. Jeffers

  • Dimensions of adjustable autonomy and mixed-initiative-interaction

    Jeffrey M. Bradshaw;Paul J. Feltovich;Hyuckchul Jung;Shriniwas Kulkarni

  • Trust in Automation

    R. R. Hoffman;M. Johnson;J. M. Bradshaw;A. Underbrink

  • The Seven Deadly Myths of "Autonomous Systems"

    J. M. Bradshaw;R. R. Hoffman;M. Johnson;D. D. Woods

  • What Is a Conversation Policy

    Mark Greaves;Heather Holmback;Jeffrey Bradshaw

  • Representation and reasoning for DAML-based policy and domain services in KAoS and nomads

    J. Bradshaw;A. Uszok;R. Jeffers;N. Suri

  • Human-Agent Teamwork and Adjustable Autonomy in Practice

    Maarten Sierhuis;Jeffrey M. Bradshaw;Alessandro Acquisti;Ron van Hoof

  • Strong Mobility and Fine-Grained Resource Control in NOMADS

    Niranjan Suri;Jeffrey Bradshaw;Maggie R. Breedy;Paul T. Groth

  • Knowledge acquisition as a constructive modeling activity

    Kenneth M. Ford;Jeffrey M. Bradshaw;Jack R. Adams-Webber;Neil M. Agnew

  • Designing conversation policies using joint intention theory

    I.A. Smith;P.R. Cohen;J.M. Bradshaw;M. Greaves

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul J. Feltovich
Paul J. Feltovich Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Robert R. Hoffman
Robert R. Hoffman Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Austin Tate
Austin Tate University of Edinburgh
Catholijn M. Jonker
Catholijn M. Jonker Delft University of Technology
Paul Groth
Paul Groth University of Amsterdam
Alessandro Acquisti
Alessandro Acquisti Carnegie Mellon University
David Woods
David Woods The Ohio State University
James F. Allen
James F. Allen University of Rochester
John-Jules Ch. Meyer
John-Jules Ch. Meyer Utrecht University
William J. Clancey
William J. Clancey Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways. Students often choose to specialize or enhance their qualifications through online programs that offer both flexibility and innovation.

For those seeking an accelerated learning experience, pursuing the fastest computer science degree can be a smart choice. These programs are designed for motivated learners looking to enter the workforce quickly.

Many students are also interested in cost-effective options, such as the cheapest online environmental science degree or the cheapest online physics degree. These programs provide essential skills at a fraction of the cost, without sacrificing quality.

Another popular pathway is the online mechanical engineering degree, which can complement computer science studies and open up interdisciplinary career opportunities.

Whatever your focus, online degrees in these fields can help you build a flexible, robust, and future-proof career in technology and engineering.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey M. Bradshaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles