World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5962
World Ranking
10255
National Ranking
186

Frances M. T. Brazier publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances M. T. Brazier sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 309 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Frances M. T. Brazier D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances M. T. Brazier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frances M. T. Brazier is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields, including Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Networks and Communications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Ocean Engineering.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics relevant to technological innovation and social interaction, highlighting areas such as:

  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Brazier are:

  • Towards coordinated self-organization: An actor-centered framework for the design of disaster management information systems, 2020, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Designing for meaningful social interaction in digital serious games, 2020, Entertainment Computing
  • Mapping the knowledge domain of soft computing applications for emergency evacuation studies: A scientometric analysis and critical review, 2022, Safety Science
  • Participatory Design Going Digital: Challenges and Opportunities for Distributed Place-Making, 2022, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
  • Re-framing engagement for applied games: A conceptual framework, 2021, Entertainment Computing

Brazier's frequent co-authors include:

  • Stephan Lukosch
  • Martijn Warnier
  • Geertje Slingerland
  • Iulia Lefter
  • Indushree Banerjee

The scientist's publications often appear in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Entertainment Computing
  • Behaviour and Information Technology
  • Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

This profile reflects Brazier's diverse academic interests and contributions in interdisciplinary areas connecting technology, social science, and educational research.

Best Publications

  • DESIRE: Modelling Multi-Agent Systems in a Compositional Formal Framework

    Frances M. T. Brazier;Barbara Dunin-Keplicz;Nicholas R. Jennings;Jan Treur

  • Formal Specification of Multi-Agent Systems

    F. M. T. Brazier;B. D. Keplicz;N. R. Jennings;J. Treur

  • Formal Specification of Multi-Agent Systems: a Real World Case

    Frances M. T. Brazier;Barbara Dunin-Keplicz;Nick R. Jennings;Jan Treur

  • Scalable Middleware Environment for Agent-Based Internet Applications

    Benno J. Overeinder;Frances M. T. Brazier

  • Principles of component-based design of intelligent agents

    Frances M. T. Brazier;Catholijn M. Jonker;Jan Treur

  • Compositional Design and Reuse of a Generic Agent Model .

    Frances M. T. Brazier;Catholijn M. Jonker;Jan Treur

  • Supporting internet-scale multi-agent systems

    N. J. E. Wijngaards;B. J. Overeinder;M. van Steen;F. M. T. Brazier

  • The Impact of the Topology on Cascading Failures in a Power Grid Model

    Yakup Koç;Martijn Warnier;Piet Van Mieghem;Robert E. Kooij;Robert E. Kooij

  • Principles of Compositional Multi-agent System Development

    F.M. Brazier;C.M. Jonker;J. Treur

  • Exploration of multi-layered knowledge sharing participation: the roles of perceived benefits and costs

    Mohammadbashir Sedighi;Sander van Splunter;Frances M. T. Brazier;Cees van Beers

  • A method for decentralized clustering in large multi-agent systems

    Elth Ogston;Benno Overeinder;Maarten van Steen;Frances Brazier

  • Managing violations in service level agreements

    Omer Farooq Rana;Martijn Warnier;Thomas B. Quillinan;Francis Brazier

  • Agents and Service-Oriented Computing for Autonomic Computing: A Research Agenda

    F.M.T. Brazier;J.O. Kephart;H. Van Dyke Parunak;M.N. Huhns

  • An entropy-based metric to quantify the robustness of power grids against cascading failures

    Yakup Koç;Martijn Warnier;Robert E. Kooij;Robert E. Kooij;Frances M.T. Brazier

  • Modelling Internal Dynamic Behaviour of BDI agents.

    Frances M. T. Brazier;Barbara Dunin-Keplicz;Jan Treur;Rineke Verbrugge

  • Agent factory: generative migration of mobile agents in heterogeneous environments

    F. M. T. Brazier;B. J. Overeinder;M. van Steen;N. J. E. Wijngaards

  • Formalization of a Cooperation Model Based on Joint Intentions

    Frances M. T. Brazier;Catholijn M. Jonker;Jan Treur

  • ON FORMAL SPECIFICATION OF DESIGN TASKS

    F. M. T. Brazier;P. H. G. Van Langen;Zs. Ruttkay;J. Treur

  • Compositional modelling of reflective agents

    Frances M.T. Brazier;Jan Treur

  • Composing Web Services using an Agent Factory

    Debbie Richards;Debbie Richards;Sander van Splunter;Sander van Splunter;Frances M.T. Brazier;Frances M.T. Brazier;Marta Sabou;Marta Sabou

  • Agents negotiating for load balancing of electricity use

    F. Brazier;F. Cornelissen;R. Gustavsson;C.M. Jonker

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Treur
Jan Treur Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Catholijn M. Jonker
Catholijn M. Jonker Delft University of Technology
Stephan Lukosch
Stephan Lukosch University of Canterbury
Andrew S. Tanenbaum
Andrew S. Tanenbaum Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marta Sabou
Marta Sabou Vienna University of Economics and Business
Frank Dignum
Frank Dignum Umeå University
Nicholas R. Jennings
Nicholas R. Jennings Loughborough University
Maarten van Steen
Maarten van Steen University of Twente
Pericles Loucopoulos
Pericles Loucopoulos University of Manchester
Virginia Dignum
Virginia Dignum Umeå University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens doors to many closely related fields. For example, professionals interested in data analytics may want to consider data science degrees. These programs often build on computer science fundamentals and are in high demand across many industries.

If you are more hardware-focused, there are several accredited online electrical engineering programs to choose from. These courses prepare graduates for careers in fields like robotics, telecommunications, and embedded systems.

For those seeking a faster route into the tech workforce, look into quick certifications that pay well. These programs can help you rapidly upskill and land technology roles with strong earning potential, ideal for career changers.

Finally, ambitious students seeking to advance their education quickly can pursue shortest masters degree programs online. These programs are designed to accelerate your path to a graduate degree, allowing for faster career progression while maintaining flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Frances M. T. Brazier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles