World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
61
Citations
15586
World Ranking
3061
National Ranking
182

Michael Luck publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Luck sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 442 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Luck D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Luck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Luck is affiliated with the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Social Sciences, with additional contributions to subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Safety Research, and Computer Networks and Communications.

Their work focuses on several main topics, including:

  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Auction Theory and Applications

Michael Luck has published research in a variety of venues, frequently contributing to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • JACOW
  • AI Matters
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Michael Luck include:

  • "Autonomous agents and multiagent systems," 2021, AI Matters
  • "AgentCoder: Multi-Agent-based Code Generation with Iterative Testing and Optimisation," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Combining theory of mind and abductive reasoning in agent-oriented programming," 2023, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • "Reasoning and interaction for social artificial intelligence," 2022, AI Communications
  • "Preferences for AI Explanations Based on Cognitive Style and Socio-Cultural Factors," 2024, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

In addition to journal and conference publications, Michael Luck has authored a book titled Computational Models of Argument, published in 2024 by Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications.

Frequent collaborators in their work include Odinaldo Rodrigues, Yali Du, Richard H. Willis, Joel Z. Leibo, and Nathan Gavenski, reflecting ongoing partnerships in multi-author research projects.

Best Publications

  • TRAVOS: Trust and Reputation in the Context of Inaccurate Information Sources

    W. T. Teacy;Jigar Patel;Nicholas R. Jennings;Michael Luck

  • Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing (A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing)

    Michael Luck;Peter McBurney;Chris Preist

  • Understanding Agent Systems

    Mark d'Inverno;Michael Luck

  • A Formal Specification of dMARS

    Mark d'Inverno;David Kinny;Michael Luck;Michael Wooldridge

  • Agent technology, Computing as Interaction: A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing

    M Luck;P McBurney;O Shehory;S Willmott

  • A Normative Framework for Agent-Based Systems

    Fabiola Lopez y Lopez;Michael Luck;Mark d'Inverno

  • Applying Artificial Intelligence to Virtual Reality: Intelligent Virtual Environments

    Michael Luck;Ruth Aylett

  • A Formal Framework for Agency and Autonomy

    Michael Luck;Mark d'Inverno

  • Plagiarism in programming assignments

    M. Joy;M. Luck

  • Agent-based formation of virtual organisations

    Timothy J. Norman;Alun Preece;Stuart Chalmers;Nicholas R. Jennings

  • Agent technology: Enabling next generation computing

    Michael Luck;Peter Mcburney;Chris Preist

  • The dMARS Architecture: A Specification of the Distributed Multi-Agent Reasoning System

    Mark D'Inverno;Michael Luck;Michael Georgeff;David Kinny

  • Coping with inaccurate reputation sources: experimental analysis of a probabilistic trust model

    W. T. Luke Teacy;Jigar Patel;Nicholas R. Jennings;Michael Luck

  • Agent-based software development

    Michael Luck;Ronald Ashri;Mark d'Inverno

  • Multi-Agent Systems and Applications

    Michael Luck;Vladimir Marik;Olga Stepankova;Robert Trappl

  • A Manifesto for Agent Technology: Towards Next Generation Computing

    Michael Luck;Peter McBurney;Chris Preist

  • AAMAS '05: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

    Jigar Patel;W. T. Luke Teacy;Nicholas R. Jennings;Michael Luck

  • Negotiation in multi-agent systems

    Martin Beer;Mark D'inverno;Michael Luck;Nick Jennings

  • Learning in multi-agent systems

    Eduardo Alonso;Mark D'inverno;Daniel Kudenko;Michael Luck

  • Agent-based virtual organisations for the Grid

    Jigar Patel;W. T. Luke Teacy;Nicholas R. Jennings;Michael Luck

  • Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems

    Michael Luck;M. d'Inverno

  • Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE / WIC / ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence

    Andrzej Skowron;Rakesh Agrawal;Michael Luck;Takahira Yamaguchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Miles
Simon Miles King's College London
Mark d'Inverno
Mark d'Inverno Goldsmiths University of London
Peter McBurney
Peter McBurney King's College London
Nicholas R. Jennings
Nicholas R. Jennings Loughborough University
Luc Moreau
Luc Moreau King's College London
Terry R. Payne
Terry R. Payne University of Liverpool
Timothy J. Norman
Timothy J. Norman University of Southampton
Sanjay Modgil
Sanjay Modgil King's College London
Alun Preece
Alun Preece Cardiff University
Carlos José Pereira de Lucena
Carlos José Pereira de Lucena Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Computer Science in the USA, there are many related online degrees and career pathways to consider. Fields such as criminal justice, accounting, data science, and construction management all offer accredited online programs that can complement or expand your expertise.

For those drawn to law and technology, earning a criminal justice online degree opens doors to cybersecurity, digital forensics, and public sector roles. Meanwhile, understanding the accounting degree cost can help you plan your education, especially as finance and computer science increasingly intersect in data analytics and fintech.

Data science stands out as a popular specialization for those with a computer science background. An online masters in data science can prepare you for high-demand roles in machine learning, AI, and big data.

Additionally, those interested in technology solutions for infrastructure and project management should explore a online construction management program—an area where digital tools and computer science make a rising impact.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Luck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles