World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
13533
World Ranking
9501
National Ranking
590

Terry R. Payne publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terry R. Payne sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 219 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Terry R. Payne D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terry R. Payne sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Terry R. Payne is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics of their research contributions include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Among their recently published papers are the following:

  • Text-based Question Difficulty Prediction: A Systematic Review of Automatic Approaches, 2023, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Vision Screening Assessment (VISA) tool: diagnostic accuracy validation of a novel screening tool in detecting visual impairment among stroke survivors, 2020, BMJ Open
  • A Systematic Review of Data-Driven Approaches to Item Difficulty Prediction, 2021, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Revolutionising Financial Portfolio Management: The Non-Stationary Transformer's Fusion of Macroeconomic Indicators and Sentiment Analysis in a Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework, 2023, Applied Sciences
  • KEMIM: Knowledge-Enhanced User Multi-Interest Modeling for Recommender Systems, 2023, IEEE Access

Frequent coauthors working alongside Payne include:

  • Valentina Tamma
  • Floriana Grasso
  • Gangmin Li
  • Yong Yue
  • Ka Lok Man

Their publications often appear in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • Preprints.org
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • BMJ Open

Payne has also contributed to book publications with Springer Science+Business Media, with titles including The Semantic Web - ISWC 2023, published in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities

    Massimo Paolucci;Takahiro Kawamura;Terry R. Payne;Katia P. Sycara

  • DAML-S: semantic markup for web services

    Anupriya Ankolekar;Mark Burstein;Jerry R. Hobbs;Ora Lassila

  • DAML-S: Web Service Description for the Semantic Web

    Mark H. Burstein;Jerry R. Hobbs;Ora Lassila;David Martin

  • Bringing semantics to web services: the OWL-S approach

    David Martin;Massimo Paolucci;Sheila McIlraith;Mark Burstein

  • Importing the Semantic Web in UDDI

    Massimo Paolucci;Takahiro Kawamura;Takahiro Kawamura;Terry R. Payne;Katia P. Sycara

  • DAML-S: A Semantic Markup Language For Web Services

    Anupriya Ankolenkar;Mark Burstein;Jerry Hobbs;Ora Lassila

  • Approaches to semantic web services: An overview and comparisons

    Liliana Cabral;John Domingue;Enrico Motta;Terry R. Payne

  • FALCON: Feedback Adaptive Loop for Content-Based Retrieval

    Leejay Wu;Christos Faloutsos;Katia P. Sycara;Terry R. Payne

  • Trusting Intelligent Machines: Deepening Trust Within Socio-Technical Systems

    Peter Andras;Lukas Esterle;Michael Guckert

  • Interface Agents that Learn: An investigation of Learning Issues in a Mail Agent Interface

    Terry R. Payne;Peter Edwards

  • Semantic Web Services

    Terry R. Payne;Ora Lassila

  • Argumentation over ontology correspondences in MAS

    Loredana Laera;Ian Blacoe;Valentina Tamma;Terry Payne

  • Automating experiments using semantic data in a bioinformatics grid

    C. Wroe;C. Goble;M. Greenwood;P. Lord

  • Developing Intelligent Agent Systems by Lin Padgham and Michael Winikoff, John Wiley and Sons, 230 pp., $45.00, ISBN 0-470-86120-7

    Terry R. Payne

  • Guest Editors' Introduction: Semantic Web Services

    T. Payne;O. Lassila

  • Auction Mechanisms for Efficient Advertisement Selection on Public Displays

    Terry Payne;Ester David;Nicholas R. Jennings;Matthew Sharifi

  • Reaching agreement over ontology alignments

    Loredana Laera;Valentina Tamma;Jérôme Euzenat;Trevor Bench-Capon

  • Calendar Agents on the Semantic Web

    Terry R. Payne;Rahul Singh;Katia Sycara

  • Web Services from an Agent Perspective

    T.R. Payne

  • An Ontological Framework for Semantic Description of Devices

    Ayomi Bandara;Terry R. Payne;David de Roure;Gary Clemo

  • Breaking the book: translating the chemistry lab book into a pervasive computing lab environment

    m. c. schraefel;Gareth V. Hughes;Hugo R. Mills;Graham Smith

  • Methodologies and Software Engineering for Agent Systems: The Agent-Oriented Software Engineering Handbook (Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations)

    L Moreau;Michael Luck;Simon Miles;J Papay

Frequent Co-Authors

Katia Sycara
Katia Sycara Carnegie Mellon University
Luc Moreau
Luc Moreau King's College London
Nicholas R. Jennings
Nicholas R. Jennings Loughborough University
Michael Luck
Michael Luck University of Sussex
Simon Miles
Simon Miles King's College London
Keith Decker
Keith Decker University of Delaware
Massimo Paolucci
Massimo Paolucci NTT (Japan)
David De Roure
David De Roure University of Oxford
Jérôme Euzenat
Jérôme Euzenat Grenoble Alpes University
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to many flexible learning options and dynamic career directions. One increasingly popular route is earning an online associate degree. This affordable and fast-paced credential can lead to entry-level tech roles or act as a stepping stone toward a bachelor’s degree.

Students concerned about costs should consider cheap online college classes. These courses provide quality education while helping you manage tuition expenses. If you’re worried about previous academic performance, many of the best colleges for low gpa accept and support learners who want to build a strong foundation in computer science.

As technology influences diverse fields, computer science graduates can pursue careers beyond traditional IT. Curious about broader directions? Learn from other fields—such as “what can you get with an environmental science degree”—to discover how interdisciplinary skills can expand your career options in both tech and environmental sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Terry R. Payne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles