World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
93
Citations
50137
World Ranking
506
National Ranking
31

Carole Goble publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carole Goble sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 592 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Carole Goble D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carole Goble sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Carole Goble is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple domains primarily within computer science and decision sciences, with a notable focus on information systems and management.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Decision Sciences

Subfields where their contributions are concentrated include:

  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Artificial Intelligence

Their research topics cover a range of areas such as:

  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction

Carole Goble has co-authored work frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Stian Soiland-Reyes
  • Frederik Coppens
  • Nick Juty
  • Susanna-Assunta Sansone
  • Björn Grüning

Their publications appear consistently in several venues, among them:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • F1000Research

Recent papers by Carole Goble and collaborators include:

  • "Methods included", 2022, Communications of the ACM
  • "Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate", 2022, Data Science
  • "COVID19 Disease Map, a computational knowledge repository of virus-host interaction mechanisms", 2021, Molecular Systems Biology
  • "Implementing FAIR Digital Objects in the EOSC-Life Workflow Collaboratory", 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • "FAIR in action - a flexible framework to guide FAIRification", 2023, Scientific Data

Best Publications

  • The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

    Mark D Wilkinson;Michel Dumontier;IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg;Gabrielle Appleton

  • Addendum: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

    Mark D. Wilkinson;Michel Dumontier;Ijsbrand Jan Aalbersberg;Gabrielle Appleton

  • Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services

    Duncan Hull;Katy Wolstencroft;Robert Stevens;Carole A Goble

  • Investigating semantic similarity measures across the Gene Ontology: the relationship between sequence and annotation.

    Phillip W. Lord;Robert D. Stevens;Andy Brass;Carole A. Goble

  • Taverna: lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences

    Thomas M. Oinn;R. Mark Greenwood;Matthew Addis;M. Nedim Alpdemir

  • The Taverna workflow suite: designing and executing workflows of Web Services on the desktop, web or in the cloud

    Katherine Wolstencroft;Robert Haines;Donal Fellows;Alan R. Williams

  • Examining the Challenges of Scientific Workflows

    Y. Gil;E. Deelman;M. Ellisman;T. Fahringer

  • OilEd: A Reason-able Ontology Editor for the Semantic Web

    Sean Bechhofer;Ian Horrocks;Carole A. Goble;Robert Stevens

  • The design and realisation of the Experimentmy Virtual Research Environment for social sharing of workflows

    David De Roure;Carole Goble;Robert Stevens

  • Ontology-based knowledge representation for bioinformatics

    Robert Stevens;Carole A. Goble;Sean Bechhofer

  • myGrid: personalised bioinformatics on the information grid

    Robert D. Stevens;Alan J. Robinson;Carole A. Goble

  • Why linked data is not enough for scientists

    Sean Bechhofer;Iain Buchan;David De Roure;Paolo Missier

  • Toward interoperable bioscience data

    Susanna-Assunta Sansone;Philippe Rocca-Serra;Dawn Field;Eamonn Maguire

  • Why Linked Data is Not Enough for Scientists

    Sean Bechhofer;John Ainsworth;Jiten Bhagat;Iain Buchan

  • TAMBIS: Transparent Access to Multiple Bioinformatics Information Sources

    Patricia G. Baker;Andy Brass;Sean Bechhofer;Carole A. Goble

  • The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology

    Alan L Rector;Sean Bechhofer;Carole A Goble;Ian Horrocks

  • FAIR principles : interpretations and implementation considerations

    Annika Jacobsen;Ricardo de Miranda Azevedo;Nick S. Juty;Dominique Batista

  • State of the nation in data integration for bioinformatics

    Carole Goble;Robert Stevens

  • myExperiment: a repository and social network for the sharing of bioinformatics workflows

    Carole A. Goble;Jiten Bhagat;Sergejs Aleksejevs;Don Cruickshank

  • Open PHACTS: Semantic interoperability for drug discovery

    Antony J. Williams;Lee Harland;Paul Groth;Stephen Pettifer

  • An ontology for bioinformatics applications.

    Patricia G. Baker;Carole A. Goble;Sean Bechhofer;Norman W. Paton

Frequent Co-Authors

Sean Bechhofer
Sean Bechhofer University of Manchester
David De Roure
David De Roure University of Oxford
Paolo Missier
Paolo Missier Newcastle University
Jun Zhao
Jun Zhao University of Oxford
Norman W. Paton
Norman W. Paton University of Manchester
Phillip Lord
Phillip Lord Newcastle University
Oscar Corcho
Oscar Corcho Technical University of Madrid
Jacky L. Snoep
Jacky L. Snoep Stellenbosch University
Alan L. Rector
Alan L. Rector University of Manchester
Paul Groth
Paul Groth University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring paths in computer science, it’s helpful to know the wide range of programs available. Many students start with an online associate degree, which can offer foundational skills and a stepping stone to a bachelor's program.

For those concerned about the cost, choosing from affordable online degree programs can make higher education more accessible. These options help students minimize debt while earning a quality education online.

Academic performance can also impact college choices. Fortunately, there are many college that accepts low gpa applicants, supporting those who may not have a high GPA but are committed to advancing their education.

Computer science degrees open the door to diverse careers, just as degrees in other fields can. For example, if you’re interested in environmental impact, you may want to explore what can you get with an environmental science degree to see how technology intersects with environmental science.

Best Scientists Citing Carole Goble

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles