World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
81
Citations
28805
World Ranking
1009
National Ranking
540

Ewa Deelman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ewa Deelman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 388 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ewa Deelman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ewa Deelman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2018 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to scientific workflow management

Overview

Ewa Deelman is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within computer science and decision sciences, with significant work in scientific computing, data management, and distributed systems.

The main fields of study covered in their publications include:

  • Computer Science
  • Decision Sciences

The subfields of study involved are:

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

The primary topics of Ewa Deelman's research work include:

  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Research Data Management Practices

Frequent co-authors in their research are:

  • Anirban Mandal
  • Karan Vahi
  • George Papadimitriou
  • Rafael Ferreira da Silva
  • Michela Taufer

Publication venues where Ewa Deelman's work has appeared most often include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • UNC Libraries
  • Future Generation Computer Systems
  • Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Recent papers by Ewa Deelman and their collaborators are:

  • "Artificial Intelligence for Modeling Complex Systems: Taming the Complexity of Expert Models to Improve Decision Making" (2021) published in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
  • "The Workflow Trace Archive: Open-Access Data From Public and Private Computing Infrastructures" (2020) in IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
  • "Workflows Community Summit: Bringing the Scientific Workflows Community Together" (2021) in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Characterizing, Modeling, and Accurately Simulating Power and Energy Consumption of I/O-intensive Scientific Workflows" (2020) in Journal of Computational Science
  • "The Pegasus workflow management system: Translational computer science in practice" (2020) in Journal of Computational Science

Ewa Deelman has contributed to several book publications through Springer Science+Business Media, notably multiple editions of "Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics" released in 2020 and 2023.

Awards received include:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2019
  • IEEE Fellow, 2018, recognized for contributions to scientific workflow management

Best Publications

  • Reproducing GW150914: the first observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger

    Duncan A. Brown;Karan Vahi;Michela Taufer;Von Welch

  • Pegasus: A framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems

    Ewa Deelman;Gurmeet Singh;Mei-Hui Su;James Blythe

  • Workflows and e-Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities

    Ewa Deelman;Dennis Gannon;Matthew Shields;Ian Taylor

  • Pegasus, a workflow management system for science automation

    Ewa Deelman;Karan Vahi;Gideon Juve;Mats Rynge

  • Workflows For E-Science: Scientific Workflows For Grids

    Ian J. Taylor;Ewa Deelman;Dennis B. Gannon;Matthew Shields

  • The cost of doing science on the cloud: the Montage example

    Ewa Deelman;Gurmeet Singh;Miron Livny;Bruce Berriman

  • Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows

    Gideon Juve;Ann Chervenak;Ewa Deelman;Shishir Bharathi

  • Examining the Challenges of Scientific Workflows

    Y. Gil;E. Deelman;M. Ellisman;T. Fahringer

  • Pegasus: Mapping Scientific Workflows onto the Grid

    Ewa Deelman;James Blythe;Yolanda Gil;Carl Kesselman

  • Characterization of scientific workflows

    S. Bharathi;A. Chervenak;E. Deelman;G. Mehta

  • Mapping Abstract Complex Workflows onto Grid Environments

    Ewa Deelman;James Blythe;Yolanda Gil;Carl Kesselman

  • WorkflowSim: A toolkit for simulating scientific workflows in distributed environments

    Weiwei Chen;Ewa Deelman

  • Algorithms for cost- and deadline-constrained provisioning for scientific workflow ensembles in IaaS clouds

    Maciej Malawski;Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Jarek Nabrzyski

  • Giggle: A Framework for Constructing Scalable Replica Location Services

    Ann Chervenak;Ewa Deelman;Ian Foster;Leanne Guy

  • On the Use of Cloud Computing for Scientific Workflows

    C. Hoffa;G. Mehta;T. Freeman;E. Deelman

  • Task scheduling strategies for workflow-based applications in grids

    J. Blythe;S. Jain;E. Deelman;Y. Gil

  • Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods.

    Victoria Stodden;Marcia McNutt;David H. Bailey;Ewa Deelman

  • Workflows for e-Science

    Ian J. Taylor;Ewa Deelman;Dennis B. Gannon;Matthew Shields

  • Scientific workflow applications on Amazon EC2

    Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Karan Vahi;Gaurang Mehta

  • A Metadata Catalog Service for Data Intensive Applications

    Gurmeet Singh;Shishir Bharathi;Ann Chervenak;Ewa Deelman

  • Montage: A grid enabled engine for delivering custom science-grade mosaics on demand

    G. Bruce Berriman;Ewa Deelman;John C. Good;Joseph C. Jacob

  • Cost- and deadline-constrained provisioning for scientific workflow ensembles in IaaS clouds

    Maciej Malawski;Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Jarek Nabrzyski

Frequent Co-Authors

Karan Vahi
Karan Vahi University of Southern California
Gaurang Mehta
Gaurang Mehta University of Southern California
Gideon Juve
Gideon Juve Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Carl Kesselman
Carl Kesselman University of Southern California
Yolanda Gil
Yolanda Gil University of Southern California
Jim Blythe
Jim Blythe University of Southern California
Daniel S. Katz
Daniel S. Katz University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Miron Livny
Miron Livny University of Wisconsin–Madison
Rizos Sakellariou
Rizos Sakellariou University of Manchester
Kari E. North
Kari E. North University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can open doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways, offering flexibility and cost-effectiveness for both recent graduates and working professionals. Many students look for the affordable online master's programs to further their education without taking on massive debt, making it possible to specialize or pivot into high-demand fields.

For those interested in management roles, programs like the online emba can provide business and leadership skills essential for tech-driven organizations. Alternatively, those drawn to information services can pursue the cheapest mlis degree online to build expertise in digital information and library science, which often intersects with computer science.

Senior professionals seeking top-tier leadership opportunities can consider a doctorate in organizational leadership online. This degree is ideal for advancing into executive positions by combining technical knowledge with advanced leadership skills.

With these flexible, affordable online degrees, computer science students and professionals can craft unique career pathways across technology, leadership, and information sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Ewa Deelman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles