World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
5671
World Ranking
13913
National Ranking
5529

Gideon Juve publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gideon Juve sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 63 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gideon Juve D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gideon Juve sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gideon Juve is affiliated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the United States. Their research profile does not currently include detailed records of recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications.

No specific main fields of study, subfields, or topics of work have been documented in the available data.

There are also no recorded awards or recognitions attributed to Gideon Juve at this time.

The information presented focuses on the foundational aspects of their professional affiliation and does not extend to detailed contributions in academic literature or collaborative networks.

Best Publications

  • Pegasus, a workflow management system for science automation

    Ewa Deelman;Karan Vahi;Gideon Juve;Mats Rynge

  • Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows

    Gideon Juve;Ann Chervenak;Ewa Deelman;Shishir Bharathi

  • Algorithms for cost- and deadline-constrained provisioning for scientific workflow ensembles in IaaS clouds

    Maciej Malawski;Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Jarek Nabrzyski

  • Scientific workflow applications on Amazon EC2

    Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Karan Vahi;Gaurang Mehta

  • Cost- and deadline-constrained provisioning for scientific workflow ensembles in IaaS clouds

    Maciej Malawski;Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Jarek Nabrzyski

  • Scientific Workflows in the Cloud

    Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman

  • Experiences using cloud computing for a scientific workflow application

    Jens-Sönke Vöckler;Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Mats Rynge

  • Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2

    Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Karan Vahi;Gaurang Mehta

  • Scientific workflows and clouds

    Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman

  • An Evaluation of the Cost and Performance of Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2

    Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;G. Bruce Berriman;Benjamin P. Berman

  • Automating Application Deployment in Infrastructure Clouds

    Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman

  • Community Resources for Enabling Research in Distributed Scientific Workflows

    Rafael Ferreira da Silva;Weiwei Chen;Gideon Juve;Karan Vahi

  • Resource Provisioning Options for Large-Scale Scientific Workflows

    G. Juve;E. Deelman

  • Scaling up workflow-based applications

    Scott Callaghan;Ewa Deelman;Dan Gunter;Gideon Juve

  • A performance model to estimate execution time of scientific workflows on the cloud

    Ilia Pietri;Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Rizos Sakellariou

  • The Application of Cloud Computing to Astronomy: A Study of Cost and Performance

    G. Bruce Berriman;Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Moira Regelson

  • Pegasus in the Cloud: Science Automation through Workflow Technologies

    Ewa Deelman;Karan Vahi;Mats Rynge;Gideon Juve

  • Online Task Resource Consumption Prediction for Scientific Workflows

    Rafael Ferreira da Silva;Gideon Juve;Mats Rynge;Ewa Deelman

  • Toward fine-grained online task characteristics estimation in scientific workflows

    Rafael Ferreira da Silva;Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman;Tristan Glatard

  • Energy-Constrained Provisioning for Scientific Workflow Ensembles

    Ilia Pietri;Maciej Malawski;Gideon Juve;Ewa Deelman

  • The Application of Cloud Computing to Astronomy: A Study of Cost and Performance

    G. Bruce Berriman;Ewa Deelman;Gideon Juve;Moira Regelson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ewa Deelman
Ewa Deelman University of Southern California
Karan Vahi
Karan Vahi University of Southern California
Gaurang Mehta
Gaurang Mehta University of Southern California
Thomas H. Jordan
Thomas H. Jordan University of Southern California
Robert W. Graves
Robert W. Graves United States Geological Survey
Miron Livny
Miron Livny University of Wisconsin–Madison
Carl Kesselman
Carl Kesselman University of Southern California
Benjamin P. Berman
Benjamin P. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Kim B. Olsen
Kim B. Olsen San Diego State University
Douglas Thain
Douglas Thain University of Notre Dame

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can open doors to a wide range of rewarding career paths. Many students and professionals are now considering additional qualifications through flexible online degree programs. For those interested in security and legal aspects, pursuing the cheapest online criminal justice degree can broaden your expertise and boost career prospects in law enforcement and cybersecurity.

The tech industry also relies heavily on finance and data analysis. Earning a credential from the best online accounting program offers a solid foundation for jobs in accounting technology or financial systems. If you are aiming for advanced roles in analytics or artificial intelligence, consider the best data science master's programs to build cutting-edge skills.

Additionally, the digital transformation of construction and project management is driving demand for tech-savvy professionals. An online degree for construction management can launch or accelerate your career in this rapidly evolving field. These pathways demonstrate how computer science knowledge can complement various industries and unlock diverse opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Gideon Juve

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles