World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
12322
World Ranking
4787
National Ranking
70

Alexandru Iosup publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandru Iosup sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 246 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alexandru Iosup D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandru Iosup sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Alexandru Iosup is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Computer Science, with a particular emphasis on subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their work spans several main topics, including:

  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Graph Theory and Algorithms
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries

Alexandru Iosup has contributed to multiple publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Future Generation Computer Systems
  • Communications of the ACM
  • IEEE Internet Computing

Their recent papers include:

  • "Methods included," 2022, Communications of the ACM
  • "The future is big graphs," 2021, Communications of the ACM
  • "The State of Serverless Applications: Collection, Characterization, and Community Consensus," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • "A Review of Serverless Use Cases and their Characteristics," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Beyond Von Neumann in the Computing Continuum: Architectures, Applications, and Future Directions," 2023, IEEE Internet Computing

Frequent collaborators of Alexandru Iosup include:

  • Cristina L. Abad
  • Nikolas Herbst
  • Simon Eismann
  • Joel Scheuner
  • Erwin van Eyk

Best Publications

  • Performance Analysis of Cloud Computing Services for Many-Tasks Scientific Computing

    A Iosup;S Ostermann;M N Yigitbasi;R Prodan

  • A Performance Analysis of EC2 Cloud Computing Services for Scientific Computing

    Simon Ostermann;Alexandria Iosup;Nezih Yigitbasi;Radu Prodan

  • Procedural content generation for games: A survey

    Mark Hendrikx;Sebastiaan Meijer;Joeri Van Der Velden;Alexandru Iosup

  • TRIBLER: a social‐based peer‐to‐peer system

    JA Pouwelse;P Garbacki;J Jun Wang;Arthur Bakker

  • On the Performance Variability of Production Cloud Services

    Alexandru Iosup;Nezih Yigitbasi;Dick Epema

  • An experience report on using gamification in technical higher education

    Alexandru Iosup;Dick Epema

  • The Grid Workloads Archive

    Alexandru Iosup;Hui Li;Mathieu Jan;Shanny Anoep

  • Statistical characterization of business-critical workloads hosted in cloud datacenters

    Siqi Shen;Vincent van Beek;Alexandra Iosup

  • TRIBLER: a social-based peer-to-peer system: Research Articles

    J. A. Pouwelse;P. Garbacki;J. Wang;A. Bakker

  • The Failure Trace Archive: Enabling Comparative Analysis of Failures in Diverse Distributed Systems

    Derrick Kondo;Bahman Javadi;Alexandru Iosup;Dick Epema

  • C-Meter: A Framework for Performance Analysis of Computing Clouds

    Nezih Yigitbasi;Alexandru Iosup;Dick Epema;Simon Ostermann

  • How are Real Grids Used? The Analysis of Four Grid Traces and Its Implications

    A. Iosup;C. Dumitrescu;D. Epema;Hui Li

  • The performance of bags-of-tasks in large-scale distributed systems

    Alexandru Iosup;Ozan Sonmez;Shanny Anoep;Dick Epema

  • Serverless is More: From PaaS to Present Cloud Computing

    Erwin van Eyk;Lucian Toader;Sacheendra Talluri;Laurens Versluis

  • Grid Computing Workloads

    A Iosup;D Epema

  • The future is big graphs: a community view on graph processing systems

    Sherif Sakr;Angela Bonifati;Hannes Voigt;Alexandru Iosup

  • On the dynamic resource availability in grids

    A. Iosup;M. Jan;O. Sonmez;D.H.J. Epema

  • Methods Included: Standardizing Computational Reuse and Portability with the Common Workflow Language.

    Michael R. Crusoe;Sanne Abeln;Alexandru Iosup;Peter Amstutz

  • LDBC graphalytics: a benchmark for large-scale graph analysis on parallel and distributed platforms

    Alexandru Iosup;Tim Hegeman;Wing Lung Ngai;Stijn Heldens

  • How Well Do Graph-Processing Platforms Perform? An Empirical Performance Evaluation and Analysis

    Yong Guo;Marcin Biczak;Ana Lucia Varbanescu;Alexandru Iosup

  • Dynamic Resource Provisioning in Massively Multiplayer Online Games

    V Nae;A Iosup;R Prodan

  • An Early Performance Analysis of Cloud Computing Services for Scientific Computing

    Simon Ostermann;Alexandru Iosup;Nezih Yigitbasi;Radu Prodan

Frequent Co-Authors

Dick Epema
Dick Epema Delft University of Technology
Radu Prodan
Radu Prodan University of Innsbruck
Thomas Fahringer
Thomas Fahringer University of Innsbruck
Johan Pouwelse
Johan Pouwelse Delft University of Technology
Samuel Kounev
Samuel Kounev University of Würzburg
Henk Sips
Henk Sips Delft University of Technology
Derrick Kondo
Derrick Kondo French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Peter Boncz
Peter Boncz Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Ramin Yahyapour
Ramin Yahyapour University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students are now choosing to pursue their education remotely for flexibility and cost-effectiveness. Enrolling in cheap online colleges can help minimize student debt while still gaining a valuable qualification.

If your interests extend into technical fields beyond Computer Science, consider programs offered by top engineering schools online. These options offer specialized knowledge in high-demand sectors such as software engineering and data analysis.

For professionals seeking to advance their education while continuing to work, there are affordable emba programs available. These programs are tailored for working adults looking to move into leadership roles or transition their careers.

Beyond technology, those interested in managing digital resources or supporting research may find value in a library science degree online. This path prepares graduates for careers in information science, digital archiving, and academic support.

These diverse online degree options support multiple career outcomes, making it easier to customize your education for your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Alexandru Iosup

Trending Scientists