World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Fahringer

Thomas Fahringer

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
12346
World Ranking
4306
National Ranking
28

Thomas Fahringer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Fahringer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 369 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thomas Fahringer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Fahringer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Fahringer is affiliated with the University of Innsbruck in Austria and has a primary research focus in the field of Computer Science. Their work spans multiple subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Hardware and Architecture, Information Systems and Management, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's research extensively covers topics related to Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Advanced Data Storage Technologies, Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Research Data Management Practices, and IoT and Edge/Fog Computing.

Frequent publication venues for Thomas Fahringer include arXiv (Cornell University), International Journal of Parallel Programming, Future Generation Computer Systems, Internet of Things, and IEEE Software.

Thomas Fahringer has co-authored research with several scholars, notably Peter Thoman, Sasko Ristov, Stefan Pedratscher, Juan Aznar-Poveda, and Philip Salzmann.

Recent papers by Thomas Fahringer include the following:

  • AFCL: An Abstract Function Choreography Language for serverless workflow specification (2020) published in Future Generation Computer Systems
  • Evolutionary Multi-Objective Workflow Scheduling for Volatile Resources in the Cloud (2020) published in IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing
  • Workflows Community Summit: Bringing the Scientific Workflows Community Together (2021) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • xAFCL: Run Scalable Function Choreographies Across Multiple FaaS Systems (2021) published in IEEE Transactions on Services Computing
  • DAF: Dependency-Aware FaaSifier for Node.js Monolithic Applications (2020) published in IEEE Software

Best Publications

  • Performance Analysis of Cloud Computing Services for Many-Tasks Scientific Computing

    A Iosup;S Ostermann;M N Yigitbasi;R Prodan

  • A Performance Analysis of EC2 Cloud Computing Services for Scientific Computing

    Simon Ostermann;Alexandria Iosup;Nezih Yigitbasi;Radu Prodan

  • Examining the Challenges of Scientific Workflows

    Y. Gil;E. Deelman;M. Ellisman;T. Fahringer

  • Scheduling of scientific workflows in the ASKALON grid environment

    Marek Wieczorek;Radu Prodan;Thomas Fahringer

  • ASKALON: a tool set for cluster and Grid computing

    Thomas Fahringer;Alexandru Jugravu;Sabri Pllana;Radu Prodan

  • ASKALON: A Grid Application Development and Computing Environment

    T. Fahringer;R. Prodan;Rubing Duan;F. Nerieri

  • A Multi-objective Approach for Workflow Scheduling in Heterogeneous Environments

    Hamid Mohammadi Fard;Radu Prodan;Juan Jose Durillo Barrionuevo;Thomas Fahringer

  • ASKALON: A Development and Grid Computing Environment for Scientific Workflows

    Thomas Fahringer;Radu Prodan;Rubing Duan;Jüurgen Hofer

  • Specification of grid workflow applications with AGWL: an Abstract Grid Workflow Language

    T. Fahringer;J. Qin;S. Hainzer

  • A Truthful Dynamic Workflow Scheduling Mechanism for Commercial Multicloud Environments

    Hamid Mohammadi Fard;Radu Prodan;Thomas Fahringer

  • GroudSim: an event-based simulation framework for computational grids and clouds

    Simon Ostermann;Kassian Plankensteiner;Radu Prodan;Thomas Fahringer

  • Grid capacity planning with negotiation-based advance reservation for optimized QoS

    Mumtaz Siddiqui;Alex Villazón;Thomas Fahringer

  • A taxonomy of task-based parallel programming technologies for high-performance computing

    Peter Thoman;Kiril Dichev;Thomas Heller;Roman Iakymchuk

  • A static parameter based performance prediction tool for parallel programs

    Thomas Fahringer;Hans P. Zima

  • GRP-HEFT: A Budget-Constrained Resource Provisioning Scheme for Workflow Scheduling in IaaS Clouds

    Hamid Reza Faragardi;Mohammad Reza Saleh Sedghpour;Saber Fazliahmadi;Thomas Fahringer

  • Dynamic scheduling of scientific workflow applications on the grid: a case study

    Radu Prodan;Thomas Fahringer

  • ASKALON: a tool set for cluster and Grid computing: Research Articles

    Thomas Fahringer;Alexandru Jugravu;Sabri Pllana;Radu Prodan

  • An automatic input-sensitive approach for heterogeneous task partitioning

    Klaus Kofler;Ivan Grasso;Biagio Cosenza;Thomas Fahringer

  • Bi-criteria Scheduling of Scientific Workflows for the Grid

    M. Wieczorek;S. Podlipnig;R. Prodan;T. Fahringer

  • A multi-objective auto-tuning framework for parallel codes

    Herbert Jordan;Peter Thoman;Juan J. Durillo;Simone Pellegrini

  • An Early Performance Analysis of Cloud Computing Services for Scientific Computing

    Simon Ostermann;Alexandru Iosup;Nezih Yigitbasi;Radu Prodan

Frequent Co-Authors

Radu Prodan
Radu Prodan University of Innsbruck
Hong-Linh Truong
Hong-Linh Truong Aalto University
Alexandru Iosup
Alexandru Iosup Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dick Epema
Dick Epema Delft University of Technology
Péter Kacsuk
Péter Kacsuk MTA SZTAKI Laboratory of Parallel and Distributed Systems
Juan J. Durillo
Juan J. Durillo Leibniz Supercomputing Centre
Ewa Deelman
Ewa Deelman University of Southern California
Peter Brunner
Peter Brunner Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in computer science grows, many students are exploring related online degrees to broaden their skills and career options. One popular option is pursuing an online master data science program, which builds on computational skills and prepares graduates for data-driven industries.

Beyond tech, emerging fields like construction management also offer innovative online study paths. For example, earning an online degree for construction management can help professionals pivot into project leadership within the built environment sector.

Cost and convenience are key factors students consider. For aspiring business professionals, enrolling in one of the cheapest 1 year online mba programs provides a fast, affordable route to leadership roles in tech and beyond.

Finally, if you’re seeking quick entry or career advancement, many online one year masters programs let you earn an advanced degree in less time—accelerating your professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Fahringer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles