World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
6258
World Ranking
12950
National Ranking
632

Juan J. Durillo publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan J. Durillo sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 72 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Juan J. Durillo D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan J. Durillo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Juan J. Durillo is affiliated with the Leibniz Supercomputing Centre in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions to subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The main topics covered by Durillo's work include Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms, Advanced Data Storage Technologies, IoT and Edge/Fog Computing, Software-Defined Networks and 5G, Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research, and Optimal Experimental Design Methods.

Durillo has coauthored publications with several researchers, including:

  • José F. Aldana-Martín
  • Antonio J. Nebro
  • María del Mar Roldán-García
  • Ennio Torre
  • Vincenzo De Maio

Their frequent publication venues are:

  • Information and Software Technology
  • SoftwareX
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Engineering Optimization

Recent papers authored by Juan J. Durillo include:

  • "A dynamic evolutionary multi-objective virtual machine placement heuristic for cloud data centers" (2020) published in Information and Software Technology
  • "Evolver: Meta-optimizing multi-objective metaheuristics" (2023) published in SoftwareX
  • "Survey of adaptive containerization architectures for HPC" (2023) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Leveraging large language models for the automatic implementation of problems in optimization frameworks" (2025) published in Engineering Optimization

Best Publications

  • jMetal: A Java framework for multi-objective optimization

    Juan J. Durillo;Antonio J. Nebro

  • SMPSO: A new PSO-based metaheuristic for multi-objective optimization

    A.J. Nebro;J.J. Durillo;J. Garcia-Nieto;C.A. Coello Coello

  • MOCell: A cellular genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization

    Antonio J. Nebro;Juan J. Durillo;Francisco Luna;Bernabé Dorronsoro

  • AbYSS: Adapting Scatter Search to Multiobjective Optimization

    Antonio J. Nebro;Francisco Luna;Enrique Alba;BernabÉ Dorronsoro

  • MOCell: A cellular genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization

    Unknown

  • The jMetal framework for multi-objective optimization: Design and architecture

    Juan J. Durillo;Antonio J. Nebro;Enrique Alba

  • Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimizers: An Experimental Comparison

    Juan J. Durillo;José García-Nieto;Antonio J. Nebro;Carlos A. Coello

  • Redesigning the jMetal Multi-Objective Optimization Framework

    Antonio J. Nebro;Juan J. Durillo;Matthieu Vergne

  • Multi-objective workflow scheduling in Amazon EC2

    Juan J. Durillo;Radu Prodan

  • jMetal: a Java Framework for Developing Multi-Objective Optimization Metaheuristics

    Juan J. Durillo;Antonio J. Nebro;Francisco Luna;Bernabe Dorronsoro

  • Multi-objective energy-efficient workflow scheduling using list-based heuristics

    Juan José Durillo;Vlad Nae;Radu Prodan

  • A Study of Multiobjective Metaheuristics When Solving Parameter Scalable Problems

    J J Durillo;A J Nebro;C A C Coello;José García-Nieto

  • MOHEFT: A multi-objective list-based method for workflow scheduling

    Juan J. Durillo;Hamid Mohammadi Fard;Radu Prodan

  • A study of the bi-objective next release problem

    Juan J. Durillo;Yuanyuan Zhang;Enrique Alba;Mark Harman

  • Design issues in a multiobjective cellular genetic algorithm

    Antonio J. Nebro;Juan J. Durillo;Francisco Luna;Bernabé Dorronsoro

  • A multi-objective auto-tuning framework for parallel codes

    Herbert Jordan;Peter Thoman;Juan J. Durillo;Simone Pellegrini

  • A study of master-slave approaches to parallelize NSGA-II

    J.J. Durillo;A.J. Nebro;F. Luna;E. Alba

  • Predicting Workflow Task Execution Time in the Cloud Using A Two-Stage Machine Learning Approach

    Thanh-Phuong Pham;Juan J. Durillo;Thomas Fahringer

  • A Study of the Multi-objective Next Release Problem

    Juan J. Durillo;YuanYuan Zhang;Enrique Alba;Antonio J. Nebro

  • Solving Three-Objective Optimization Problems Using a New Hybrid Cellular Genetic Algorithm

    Juan José Durillo;Antonio Jesús Nebro;Francisco Luna;Enrique Alba

  • A novel multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with fuzzy logic based adaptive selection of operators: FAME

    Alejandro Santiago;Bernabé Dorronsoro;Antonio J. Nebro;Juan J. Durillo

  • Optimal antenna placement using a new multi-objective chc algorithm

    Antonio J. Nebro;Enrique Alba;Guillermo Molina;Francisco Chicano

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio J. Nebro
Antonio J. Nebro University of Malaga
Enrique Alba
Enrique Alba University of Malaga
Radu Prodan
Radu Prodan University of Innsbruck
Bernabé Dorronsoro
Bernabé Dorronsoro University of Cádiz
Thomas Fahringer
Thomas Fahringer University of Innsbruck
Mark Harman
Mark Harman University College London
Javier Del Ser
Javier Del Ser University of the Basque Country
Stefano Ermon
Stefano Ermon Stanford University
Gagangeet Singh Aujla
Gagangeet Singh Aujla Durham University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to a range of online degree options and career pathways. For those seeking flexible education, an associate degree online can be a smart, fast-track introduction to technology fields, offering foundational skills and job readiness within two years.

Advancing further, aspiring professionals often wonder which master's degree is most in demand in usa. In Computer Science, specialized master’s programs, including data science, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence, are highly valued by employers and can lead to lucrative roles.

Budget-conscious students can consider cheap online degrees fast to earn a credible qualification without accumulating excessive debt. Many accredited institutions now offer affordable, accelerated programs for learners worldwide.

Finally, if your academic record isn’t perfect, there are universities for low gpa applicants that provide flexible admission pathways. These institutions recognize potential beyond grades and support diverse learners in reaching their goals in tech-driven fields.

Best Scientists Citing Juan J. Durillo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles