World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 55 3875 3704 1477 1362 235 10373

James R. Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James R. Campbell between 1983 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James R. Campbell published across 44 years, from 1983 to 2026, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 135 publications in 2023. 11 of the 424 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 135. Peak 135 publications in 2023. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 135 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
1983 2026

424 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James R. Campbell: publications per year, 1983 to 2026
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 2
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 3
1994 2
1995 3
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 2
2000 2
2001 15
2002 17
2003 17
2004 6
2005 3
2006 3
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 7
2011 10
2012 5
2013 18
2014 13
2015 12
2016 23
2017 16
2018 13
2019 15
2020 13
2021 10
2022 17
2023 135
2024 13
2025 10
2026 1
Total 424
Download as CSV

James R. Campbell publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 235 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220 235
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

James R. Campbell D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177 55
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

James R. Campbell is affiliated with the United States Naval Research Laboratory in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within environmental science, earth and planetary sciences, as well as medicine.

The main fields of study for Campbell include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their work delves into specific subfields such as:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Hematology
  • Immunology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Campbell's research topics are diverse, focusing primarily on atmospheric and environmental phenomena. Key topics include:

  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

Their frequent coauthors reflect ongoing collaborative efforts and include:

  • Simone Lolli
  • Jared W. Marquis
  • Jasper R. Lewis
  • Erica K. Dolinar
  • Jianglong Zhang

Campbell's publications frequently appear in several prominent scientific venues:

  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
  • npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Among recent papers attributed to Campbell or their research group are:

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Aspirin Dosing in Cardiovascular Disease, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Australia's Black Summer pyrocumulonimbus super outbreak reveals potential for increasingly extreme stratospheric smoke events, 2021, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
  • Arctic spring and summertime aerosol optical depth baseline from long-term observations and model reanalyses - Part 1: Climatology and trend, 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • COVID-19 patients with documented alcohol use disorder or alcohol-related complications are more likely to be hospitalized and have higher all-cause mortality, 2022, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • A global analysis of diurnal variability in dust and dust mixture using CATS observations, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Best Publications

  • Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements

    David M. Giles;Alexander Sinyuk;Mikhail G. Sorokin;Joel S. Schafer

  • Global monitoring of clouds and aerosols using a network of micropulse lidar systems

    Ellsworth J. Welton;James R. Campbell;James D. Spinhirne;V. Stanley Scott

  • Full-Time, Eye-Safe Cloud and Aerosol Lidar Observation at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Sites: Instruments and Data Analysis

    James R. Campbell;Dennis L. Hlavka;Ellsworth J. Welton;Connor J. Flynn

  • Observing and understanding the Southeast Asian aerosol system by remote sensing: An initial review and analysis for the Seven Southeast Asian Studies (7SEAS) program

    Jeffrey S. Reid;Edward J. Hyer;Randall S. Johnson;Brent N. Holben

  • Clouds at Arctic Atmospheric Observatories. Part I: Occurrence and Macrophysical Properties

    Matthew D. Shupe;Von P. Walden;Edwin Eloranta;Taneil Uttal

  • Wildfire-Driven Thunderstorms Cause a Volcano-Like Stratospheric Injection of Smoke

    David Peterson;James Campbell;Edward Hyer;Michael Fromm

  • Measurements of aerosol vertical profiles and optical properties during INDOEX 1999 using micropulse lidars

    Ellsworth J. Welton;Kenneth J. Voss;Patricia K. Quinn;Piotr J. Flatau

  • Using the OMI aerosol index and absorption aerosol optical depth to evaluate the NASA MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis

    V. Buchard;V. Buchard;A. M. da Silva;P. R. Colarco;A. Darmenov

  • Biodegradation of a colloidal ester-based polyurethane by soil fungi

    Joel R. Crabbe;James R. Campbell;Laura Thompson;Stephen L. Walz

  • A Midlatitude Cirrus Cloud Climatology from the Facility for Atmospheric Remote Sensing. Part I: Macrophysical and Synoptic Properties

    Kenneth Sassen;James R. Campbell

  • Analysis of measurements of Saharan dust by airborne and ground-based remote sensing methods during the Puerto Rico Dust Experiment (PRIDE)

    Jeffrey S. Reid;James E. Kinney;Douglas L. Westphal;Brent N. Holben

  • Micro-Pulse Lidar Signals: Uncertainty Analysis

    Ellsworth J. Welton;James R. Campbell

  • An 11-year global gridded aerosol optical thickness reanalysis (v1.0) for atmospheric and climate sciences

    Peng Lynch;Jeffrey S. Reid;Douglas L. Westphal;Jianglong Zhang

  • Tropical cirrus cloud contamination in sun photometer data

    Boon Ning Chew;James R. Campbell;Jeffrey S. Reid;David M. Giles

  • The 2013 Rim Fire: Implications for Predicting Extreme Fire Spread, Pyroconvection, and Smoke Emissions

    David A. Peterson;Edward J. Hyer;James R. Campbell;Michael D. Fromm

  • A Conceptual Model for Development of Intense Pyrocumulonimbus in Western North America

    David A. Peterson;Edward J. Hyer;James R. Campbell;Jeremy E. Solbrig

  • Coordinated airborne, spaceborne, and ground‐based measurements of massive thick aerosol layers during the dry season in southern Africa

    B. Schmid;J. Redemann;P. B. Russell;P. V. Hobbs

  • Saharan dust transport to the Caribbean during PRIDE: 2. Transport, vertical profiles, and deposition in simulations of in situ and remote sensing observations

    P. R. Colarco;P. R. Colarco;O. B. Toon;J. S. Reid;J. M. Livingston

  • Expression of the Neurospora crassa metallothionein gene in Escherichia coli and its effect on heavy-metal uptake.

    M. Pazirandeh;L. A. Chrisey;J. M. Mauro;J. R. Campbell

  • SAFARI 2000-Southern African Regional Science Initiative : Coordinated airborne, spaceborne, and ground-based measurements of massive thick aerosol layers during the dry season in southern Africa

    B. Schmid;J. Redemann;P. B. Russell;P. V. Hobbs

  • Measurements of aerosol vertical profiles and optical properties during INDOEX 1999 using micropulse lidars : Indian Ocean Experiment (INDOEX)

    Ellsworth J. Welton;Kenneth J. Voss;Patricia K. Quinn;Piotr J. Flatau

Frequent Co-Authors

Ellsworth J. Welton
Ellsworth J. Welton Goddard Space Flight Center
Jeffrey S. Reid
Jeffrey S. Reid United States Naval Research Laboratory
Jianglong Zhang
Jianglong Zhang University of North Dakota
James D. Spinhirne
James D. Spinhirne University of Arizona
Edward J. Hyer
Edward J. Hyer United States Naval Research Laboratory
Brent N. Holben
Brent N. Holben Goddard Space Flight Center
Douglas L. Westphal
Douglas L. Westphal United States Naval Research Laboratory
Si-Chee Tsay
Si-Chee Tsay Goddard Space Flight Center
Alexander Smirnov
Alexander Smirnov Goddard Space Flight Center
Mark A. Vaughan
Mark A. Vaughan Langley Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees that can complement your knowledge and expand career opportunities. For those considering advanced social work roles within environmental advocacy or community engagement, affordable options like dsw programs online provide flexible learning paths.

If you are seeking a broader educational foundation that supports interdisciplinary approaches to environmental challenges, pursuing an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can be an excellent option. These programs allow customization to focus on sustainability, policy, or science courses.

For students prioritizing a quicker route to graduation, the easiest bachelor's degree to get may provide insights into programs with flexible requirements, though it’s important to balance ease with academic rigor in environmental fields.

Additionally, specialized degrees such as online geology degrees offer a focused scientific perspective critical to understanding Earth systems and environmental processes. These pathways enhance career prospects in research, conservation, and resource management within the environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing James R. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles