World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
97
Citations
53789
World Ranking
426
National Ranking
193

Thomas F. Eck publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Eck sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 228 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Thomas F. Eck D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Eck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United States Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Meteorology
  • Aerosol
  • Optics

Thomas F. Eck mainly focuses on Aerosol, AERONET, Environmental science, Remote sensing and Atmospheric sciences. His Aerosol research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Wavelength and Radiance. His AERONET study incorporates themes from Angstrom exponent, Calibration, Sun photometer and Optics.

Thomas F. Eck integrates Environmental science and Climatology in his studies. His Remote sensing study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Retrieval algorithm, Scattering and Photometer. His study focuses on the intersection of Atmospheric sciences and fields such as Radiometer with connections in the field of Deposition.

His most cited work include:

  • AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization (5056 citations)
  • The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and Validation (2261 citations)
  • Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations (2081 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Thomas F. Eck mostly deals with Aerosol, Environmental science, AERONET, Atmospheric sciences and Remote sensing. His Aerosol research is under the purview of Meteorology. His study in AERONET is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both SKYNET, Photometer, Optics, Cloud fraction and Calibration.

His studies deal with areas such as Irradiance, Atmosphere, Radiative forcing and Cloud cover as well as Atmospheric sciences. Thomas F. Eck interconnects Sky, Absorption, Water vapor and Geostationary Ocean Color Imager in the investigation of issues within Remote sensing. His Angstrom exponent research incorporates themes from Mineral dust, Almucantar and Ocean color.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Aerosol (142.13%)
  • Environmental science (131.91%)
  • AERONET (117.45%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Aerosol (142.13%)
  • Environmental science (131.91%)
  • AERONET (117.45%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Thomas F. Eck focuses on Aerosol, Environmental science, AERONET, Remote sensing and Atmospheric sciences. His research in Aerosol intersects with topics in Albedo and Absorption. AERONET is a subfield of Meteorology that Thomas F. Eck investigates.

His research integrates issues of Optical depth, Almucantar and Ocean color in his study of Remote sensing. Thomas F. Eck has researched Atmospheric sciences in several fields, including Lidar, Cloud cover and Extinction. His study looks at the relationship between Sun photometer and fields such as Radiative forcing, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements (235 citations)
  • Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements (235 citations)
  • AERONET-based models of smoke-dominated aerosol near source regions and transported over oceans, and implications for satellite retrievals of aerosol optical depth (55 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Meteorology
  • Optics
  • Aerosol

Thomas F. Eck spends much of his time researching Aerosol, Environmental science, AERONET, Remote sensing and Atmospheric sciences. His work in Aerosol tackles topics such as Absorption which are related to areas like Wavelength and Particle size. His AERONET study deals with Geostationary orbit intersecting with Cloud fraction.

His work deals with themes such as Optical depth and Ocean color, which intersect with Remote sensing. His Atmospheric sciences research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Lidar, Radiative transfer and Extinction. His Meteorology study incorporates themes from Remote sensing and Climatology.

Best Publications

  • AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization

    B.N. Holben;T.F. Eck;I. Slutsker;D. Tanré

  • The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products and Validation

    L. A. Remer;Y. J. Kaufman;D. Tanré;S. Mattoo

  • Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations

    Oleg Dubovik;Brent Holben;Thomas F. Eck;Thomas F. Eck;Alexander Smirnov

  • Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols

    T. F. Eck;B. N. Holben;J. S. Reid;O. Dubovik

  • An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET

    B. N. Holben;D. Tanré;A. Smirnov;T. F. Eck;T. F. Eck;T. F. Eck

  • Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Sun and sky radiance measurements

    O. Dubovik;A. Smirnov;B. N. Holben;M. D. King

  • Application of spheroid models to account for aerosol particle nonsphericity in remote sensing of desert dust

    Oleg Dubovik;Oleg Dubovik;Alexander Sinyuk;Tatyana Lapyonok;Brent N. Holben

  • Cloud-Screening and Quality Control Algorithms for the AERONET Database

    A. Smirnov;B.N. Holben;T.F. Eck;T.F. Eck;O. Dubovik

  • A review of biomass burning emissions part III: intensive optical properties of biomass burning particles

    J. S. Reid;T. F. Eck;S. A. Christopher;R. Koppmann

  • Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements

    David M. Giles;Alexander Sinyuk;Mikhail G. Sorokin;Joel S. Schafer

  • Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land

    R. C. Levy;L. A. Remer;R. G. Kleidman;S. Mattoo

  • Spectral discrimination of coarse and fine mode optical depth

    N. T. O'Neill;N. T. O'Neill;T. F. Eck;T. F. Eck;A. Smirnov;A. Smirnov;B. N. Holben

  • Multiangle Imaging SpectroRadiometer global aerosol product assessment by comparison with the Aerosol Robotic Network

    Ralph A. Kahn;Barbara J. Gaitley;Michael J. Garay;David J. Diner

  • Non‐spherical aerosol retrieval method employing light scattering by spheroids

    O. Dubovik;O. Dubovik;B. N. Holben;T. Lapyonok;A. Sinyuk;A. Sinyuk

  • Columnar aerosol optical properties at AERONET sites in central eastern Asia and aerosol transport to the tropical mid‐Pacific

    T. F. Eck;T. F. Eck;B. N. Holben;O. Dubovik;O. Dubovik;A. Smirnov;A. Smirnov

  • Optical Properties of Atmospheric Aerosol in Maritime Environments

    Alexander Smirnov;Brent N. Holben;Yoram J. Kaufman;Oleg Dubovik

  • An analysis of AERONET aerosol absorption properties and classifications representative of aerosol source regions

    David M. Giles;David M. Giles;Brent N. Holben;Thomas F. Eck;Thomas F. Eck;Aliaksandr Sinyuk

  • Climatological aspects of the optical properties of fine/coarse mode aerosol mixtures

    Thomas F. Eck;Thomas F. Eck;B. N. Holben;Aliaksandyr Sinyuk;R. T. Pinker

  • Maritime Aerosol Network as a component of Aerosol Robotic Network

    A. Smirnov;B. N. Holben;I. Slutsker;D. M. Giles

  • Comparisons of the TOMS aerosol index with Sun-photometer aerosol optical thickness: Results and applications

    N. C. Hsu;J. R. Herman;O. Torres;B. N. Holben

  • The AERONET Version 3 aerosol retrieval algorithm, associated uncertainties and comparisons to Version 2

    Alexander Sinyuk;Brent N. Holben;Thomas F. Eck;Thomas F. Eck;David M. Giles

Frequent Co-Authors

Brent N. Holben
Brent N. Holben Goddard Space Flight Center
Alexander Smirnov
Alexander Smirnov Goddard Space Flight Center
Ilya Slutsker
Ilya Slutsker Goddard Space Flight Center
Oleg Dubovik
Oleg Dubovik University of Lille
Jeffrey S. Reid
Jeffrey S. Reid United States Naval Research Laboratory
Jhoon Kim
Jhoon Kim Yonsei University
Lorraine A. Remer
Lorraine A. Remer University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Yoram J. Kaufman
Yoram J. Kaufman Goddard Space Flight Center
Didier Tanré
Didier Tanré University of Lille
Ralph A. Kahn
Ralph A. Kahn Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways that often intersect with other fields like sociology, education, and social work. For those interested in broadening their understanding of societal impacts on the environment, pursuing an online sociology degree bachelors can be a valuable complement. This interdisciplinary approach enhances the ability to address environmental challenges with a social perspective.

For professionals aiming to advance their qualifications rapidly, exploring 1 year phd programs online no dissertation offers an efficient route to doctoral-level education without the traditional research requirements. Similarly, educators can enhance their credentials through some of the best eds to edd programs available online, which provide flexibility while deepening leadership and policy expertise.

Social work professionals focusing on community and environmental justice may find the cheapest online dsw programs a practical way to elevate their careers. These programs blend social work principles with environmental concerns, emphasizing advocacy and sustainable development.

By considering these related online degrees, students and professionals can tailor their educational journey to align with their environmental science goals, creating impactful, multidisciplinary career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas F. Eck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles