World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
24659
World Ranking
9981
National Ranking
4372

Roy A. Black publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy A. Black sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 115 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Roy A. Black D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roy A. Black sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roy A. Black is affiliated with Amgen in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The subfields of study in which they have contributed include Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Materials Chemistry, and Environmental Chemistry.

The main topics of their research focus on the Origins and Evolution of Life, Protein Structure and Dynamics, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, Photoreceptor and optogenetics research, Enzyme Structure and Function, Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms, and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena.

Their frequent co-authors include Zachary R. Cohen, Sarah L. Keller, David C. Catling, Zoe R. Todd, and Caitlin E. Cornell.

Roy A. Black has published extensively in a number of scientific journals. Their main publication venues are Langmuir, ChemBioChem, Biophysical Journal, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, and The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

Recent papers authored by or co-authored with Roy A. Black include the following:

  • Growth of Prebiotically Plausible Fatty Acid Vesicles Proceeds in the Presence of Prebiotic Amino Acids, Dipeptides, Sugars, and Nucleic Acid Components, 2022, Langmuir
  • Plausible Sources of Membrane-Forming Fatty Acids on the Early Earth: A Review of the Literature and an Estimation of Amounts, 2022, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • A Step toward Molecular Evolution of RNA: Ribose Binds to Prebiotic Fatty Acid Membranes, and Nucleosides Bind Better than Individual Bases Do, 2020, ChemBioChem
  • Binding of Dipeptides to Fatty Acid Membranes Explains Their Colocalization in Protocells but Does Not Select for Them Relative to Unjoined Amino Acids, 2021, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
  • Prebiotic Protocell Membranes Retain Encapsulated Contents during Flocculation, and Phospholipids Preserve Encapsulation during Dehydration, 2022, Langmuir

Best Publications

  • A metalloproteinase disintegrin that releases tumour-necrosis factor-α from cells

    Roy A. Black;Charles T. Rauch;Carl J. Kozlosky;Jacques J. Peschon

  • An Essential Role for Ectodomain Shedding in Mammalian Development

    Jacques J. Peschon;Jennifer L. Slack;Pranitha Reddy;Kim L. Stocking

  • Molecular cloning of the interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme

    Douglas Pat Cerretti;Carl J. Kozlosky;Bruce Mosley;Nicole Nelson

  • A Novel Proteolytic Cleavage Involved in Notch Signaling: The Role of the Disintegrin-Metalloprotease TACE

    Christel Brou;Frédérique Logeat;Neetu Gupta;Christine Bessia

  • Viral inhibition of inflammation. Cowpox virus encodes an inhibitor of the interleukin 1β converting enzyme.

    Caroline A. Ray;Roy A. Black;Shirley R. Kronheim;Teresa A. Greenstreet

  • Evidence That Tumor Necrosis Factor α Converting Enzyme Is Involved in Regulated α-Secretase Cleavage of the Alzheimer Amyloid Protein Precursor

    Joseph D. Buxbaum;Kang-Nian Liu;Yuxia Luo;Jennifer L. Slack

  • Functional Analysis of the Domain Structure of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Converting Enzyme

    Pranhitha Reddy;Jennifer L. Slack;Raymond Davis;Douglas Pat Cerretti

  • ADAMs: focus on the protease domain

    Roy A Black;Judith M White

  • Tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme (TACE) regulates epidermal growth factor receptor ligand availability.

    Susan Wohler Sunnarborg;C. Leann Hinkle;Mary Stevenson;William E. Russell

  • Generation of biologically active interleukin-1 beta by proteolytic cleavage of the inactive precursor.

    R A Black;S R Kronheim;M Cantrell;M C Deeley

  • Tumor necrosis factor-α converting enzyme

    Roy A Black

  • Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of human tumor necrosis factor-alpha-converting enzyme.

    Klaus Maskos;Carlos Fernandez-Catalan;Robert Huber;Gleb P. Bourenkov

  • Rapid and specific conversion of precursor interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta) to an active IL-1 species by human mast cell chymase.

    Hitoshi Mizutani;Norman Schechter;Gerald Lazarus;Roy A. Black

  • Activation of interleukin- 1β by a co-induced protease

    Roy A. Black;Shirley R. Kronheim;Paul R. Sleath

  • Cleavage of interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta) precursor to produce active IL-1 beta by a conserved extracellular cysteine protease from Streptococcus pyogenes.

    Vivek Kapur;Mark W. Majesky;Ling Ling Li;Roy A. Black

  • A metalloprotease inhibitor blocks shedding of the IL-6 receptor and the p60 TNF receptor.

    J Müllberg;F H Durie;C Otten-Evans;M R Alderson

  • A metalloprotease inhibitor blocks shedding of the 80-kD TNF receptor and TNF processing in T lymphocytes.

    Paul D. Crowe;Barbara N. Walter;Kendall M. Mohler;Carol Otten-Evans

  • Metalloproteases regulate T-cell proliferation and effector function via LAG-3

    Nianyu Li;Yao Wang;Karen Forbes;Kate M Vignali

  • ADAM10 is a principal 'sheddase' of the low-affinity immunoglobulin E receptor CD23

    Gisela Weskamp;Jill W Ford;Jamie Sturgill;Steve Martin

  • Human keratinocytes produce but do not process pro-interleukin-1 (IL-1) beta. Different strategies of IL-1 production and processing in monocytes and keratinocytes.

    H Mizutani;R Black;T S Kupper

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart J. Frank
Stuart J. Frank University of Alabama at Birmingham
Douglas Pat Cerretti
Douglas Pat Cerretti Amgen (United States)
Klaus Maskos
Klaus Maskos Proteros biostructures GmbH
Carl J. March
Carl J. March Amgen (United States)
Jacques J. Peschon
Jacques J. Peschon Amgen (United States)
Julius Adler
Julius Adler University of Wisconsin–Madison
Zach W. Hall
Zach W. Hall University of California, San Francisco
Wolfram Bode
Wolfram Bode Max Planck Society
Thomas S. Kupper
Thomas S. Kupper Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jason A. Burdick
Jason A. Burdick University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open up a wide range of rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and wellness. For those interested in human movement and health, pursuing kinesiology online programs can offer a path into fitness training, sports science, or physical therapy.

The demand for advanced practice nurses is also growing rapidly. If you already hold a nursing degree and want to specialize further, you might consider a 1 year pmhnp program to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, or the shortest post master's fnp program to become a Family Nurse Practitioner.

Nutrition and dietetics is another compelling field closely related to biology. Earning a credential from one of the best online registered dietitian programs enables you to promote wellbeing and help others achieve healthier lifestyles.

Whether your interests lie in lab research, patient care, or public health, online degrees can offer the flexibility and accredited coursework needed to advance your career in these fast-growing fields.

Best Scientists Citing Roy A. Black

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles