World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
7519
World Ranking
8920
National Ranking
3772

James W. Bisley publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Bisley sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 103 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James W. Bisley D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Bisley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

James W. Bisley is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a total of 17 publications. Within this domain, their work is further specialized in subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Molecular Biology, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas related to neural and sensory systems. Main topics include:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

James W. Bisley has contributed to several publication venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of Vision
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Nature Neuroscience

Among their notable papers are:

  • "The functional roles of neural remapping in cortex," 2020, Journal of Vision
  • "Bio-Inspired Haptic Feedback for Artificial Palpation in Robotic Surgery," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • "What makes a theory of consciousness unscientific?," 2025, Nature Neuroscience
  • "A Simplified Model for Simulating Population Responses of Tactile Afferents and Receptors in the Skin," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • "The roles of the lateral intraparietal area and frontal eye field in guiding eye movements in free viewing search behavior," 2021, Journal of Neurophysiology

The scientist has collaborated regularly with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Yelda Alkan
  • Koorosh Mirpour
  • Qiangqiang Ouyang
  • Juan Wu
  • Aviad Ozana

James W. Bisley received the honor of Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2006. Their career focuses on advancing the understanding of brain function, perception, and sensory integration through experimental and theoretical approaches within neuroscience and related engineering fields.

Best Publications

  • Attention, Intention, and Priority in the Parietal Lobe

    James W. Bisley;Michael E. Goldberg

  • Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention

    James W. Bisley;Michael E. Goldberg

  • The neural basis of visual attention.

    James W. Bisley

  • Saccades, salience and attention: the role of the lateral intraparietal area in visual behavior.

    Michael E. Goldberg;James W. Bisley;Keith D. Powell;Jacqueline Gottlieb

  • The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory

    Gregory J. Zelinsky;Gregory J. Zelinsky;James W. Bisley;James W. Bisley

  • Activity in the lateral intraparietal area predicts the goal and latency of saccades in a free-viewing visual search task.

    Anna E. Ipata;Angela L. Gee;Michael E. Goldberg;James W. Bisley

  • The role of the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey in the generation of saccades and visuospatial attention.

    Michael E. Goldberg;Michael E. Goldberg;James Bisley;James Bisley;Keith D. Powell;Jacqueline Gottlieb

  • LIP responses to a popout stimulus are reduced if it is overtly ignored

    Anna E Ipata;Angela L Gee;Jacqueline Gottlieb;James W Bisley;James W Bisley

  • One-Dimensional Dynamics of Attention and Decision Making in LIP

    Surya Ganguli;James W. Bisley;Jamie D. Roitman;Michael N. Shadlen

  • A Haptic Feedback System for Lower-Limb Prostheses

    R.E. Fan;M.O. Culjat;Chih-Hung King;M.L. Franco

  • Neural Correlates of Attention and Distractibility in the Lateral Intraparietal Area

    James W. Bisley;Michael E. Goldberg

  • A Rapid and Precise On-Response in Posterior Parietal Cortex

    James W. Bisley;B. Suresh Krishna;Michael E. Goldberg

  • Activity of neurons in cortical area MT during a memory for motion task.

    James W. Bisley;Daniel Zaksas;Jason A. Droll;Tatiana Pasternak

  • ENCODING OF OBJECT CURVATURE BY TACTILE AFFERENTS FROM HUMAN FINGERS

    A. W. Goodwin;V. G. Macefield;J. W. Bisley

  • The neural instantiation of a priority map.

    James W Bisley;Koorosh Mirpour

  • Neurons in the lateral intraparietal area create a priority map by the combination of disparate signals

    Anna E. Ipata;Angela L. Gee;James W. Bisley;James W. Bisley;Michael E. Goldberg

  • The Multiple Roles of Visual Cortical Areas MT/MST in Remembering the Direction of Visual Motion

    James W. Bisley;Tatiana Pasternak

  • Been there, seen that: a neural mechanism for performing efficient visual search.

    Koorosh Mirpour;Fabrice Arcizet;Wei Song Ong;James W. Bisley

  • Multi-Modal Haptic Feedback for Grip Force Reduction in Robotic Surgery.

    Ahmad Abiri;Jake Pensa;Anna Tao;Ji Ma

  • A Pure Salience Response in Posterior Parietal Cortex

    Fabrice Arcizet;Koorosh Mirpour;James W. Bisley

  • Optimization of a Pneumatic Balloon Tactile Display for Robot-Assisted Surgery Based on Human Perception

    Chih-Hung King;M.O. Culjat;M.L. Franco;J.W. Bisley

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael E. Goldberg
Michael E. Goldberg Columbia University
Jacqueline Gottlieb
Jacqueline Gottlieb Columbia University
Gregory J. Zelinsky
Gregory J. Zelinsky Stony Brook University
Gregory P. Carman
Gregory P. Carman University of California, Los Angeles
Geoffrey F. Woodman
Geoffrey F. Woodman Vanderbilt University
Paolo Bartolomeo
Paolo Bartolomeo Allen Institute for Brain Science
Bradley R. Postle
Bradley R. Postle University of Wisconsin–Madison
Frank Tong
Frank Tong Vanderbilt University
Patrick Cavanagh
Patrick Cavanagh York University
Martin Rolfs
Martin Rolfs Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Complementing a Neuroscience background, several related online degrees open diverse career pathways in counseling, therapy, and psychology. Many students interested in behavioral neuroscience pursue further training through cacrep-accredited programs online, which prepare graduates for licensure as professional counselors.

For those looking to start their journey, a counseling bachelor's degree online provides foundational skills in mental health and client support, and is often a stepping stone to advanced graduate studies.

If you're interested in specializing in relationships and family dynamics, exploring an lmft degree online (Licensed Marriage and Family Therapy) is a great option. This route equips you to address mental health challenges within couple and family systems.

Finally, those seeking advanced expertise and broader career prospects—including research, education, or clinical practice—can enroll in a master in psychology online program. Each of these pathways allows Neuroscience graduates to expand their impact in the fast-growing field of mental health care.

Best Scientists Citing James W. Bisley

Trending Scientists