World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
25670
World Ranking
4883
National Ranking
46

Jiing-Lih Farh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jiing-Lih Farh sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jiing-Lih Farh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jiing-Lih Farh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jiing-Lih Farh is affiliated with the China Europe International Business School in China. Their research primarily contributes to the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, Psychology, and Social Sciences, with a focus on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Demography, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's scholarly work spans topics within Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Ethics in Business and Education, Workplace Spirituality and Leadership, Cultural Differences and Values, Management and Organizational Studies, Workplace Violence and Bullying, and Management Theory and Practice.

Recent publications include the following papers:

  • Leader Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior and Employee Unethical Conduct: Social Learning of Moral Disengagement as a Behavioral Principle, 2020, Journal of Management
  • Is 'be yourself' always the best advice? The moderating effect of team ethical climate and the mediating effects of vigor and demand-ability fit, 2020, Human Relations
  • Asian Conceptualizations of Leadership: Progresses and Challenges, 2020, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • Transformational Leadership and Voice: When Does Felt Obligation to the Leader Matter?, 2021, Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Leaders' Impulsive Versus Strategic Abuse, Goal Realization, and Subsequent Supportive Behaviors: A Self-Regulation Perspective, 2022, Journal of Management

The following co-authors frequently collaborate with Jiing-Lih Farh:

  • Xue Zheng
  • Sebastian C. Schuh
  • Katherine Xin
  • Huiwen Lian
  • Mingyun Huai

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • Journal of Management
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Human Relations
  • Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • Journal of Business and Psychology

Best Publications

  • Employee Learning Orientation, Transformational Leadership, and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Employee Creative Self-Efficacy

    Yaping Gong;Jia-Chi Huang;Jiing-Lih Farh

  • Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society.

    Jiing-Lih Farh;P. Christopher Earley;Shu-Chi Lin

  • Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination

    Jian Liang;Crystal I C Farh;Jiing Lih Farh

  • A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations

    Jiing-Lih Farh;Bor-Shiuan Cheng

  • Individual Power Distance Orientation and Follower Reactions to Transformational Leaders: A Cross-Level, Cross-Cultural Examination

    Bradley L. Kirkman;Gilad Chen;Jiing-Lih Farh;Zhen Xiong Chen

  • Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations

    Bor-Shiuan Cheng;Li-Fang Chou;Tsung-Yu Wu;Min-Ping Huang

  • Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the People's Republic of China

    Jiing-Lih Farh;Chen-Bo Zhong;Dennis W. Organ

  • Individual-Level Cultural Values as Moderators of Perceived Organizational Support–Employee Outcome Relationships in China: Comparing the Effects of Power Distance and Traditionality

    Jiing Lih Farh;Rick D. Hackett;Jian Liang

  • The Influence of Relational Demography and Guanxi : the Chinese Case

    Jiing-Lih Farh;Anna S. Tsui;Katherine Xin;Bor-Shiuan Cheng

  • Accounting for Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Leader Fairness and Task Scope versus Satisfaction

    Jiing-Lih Farh;Philip M. Podsakoff;Dennis W. Organ

  • Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China.

    Zhen Xiong Chen;Anne S. Tsui;Anne S. Tsui;Jiing-Lih Farh

  • Where Guanxi Matters Relational Demography and Guanxi in the Chinese Context

    Anne S. Tsui;Jiing-Lih Larry Farh

  • Affective Trust in Chinese Leaders: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Employee Performance

    Xiao-Ping Chen;Marion B. Eberly;Ting-Ju Chiang;Jiing-Lih Farh

  • Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When

    Jiing-Lih Farh;Cynthia Lee;Crystal I. Cic Farh

  • Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict.

    Gilad Chen;Payal Nangia Sharma;Suzanne K. Edinger;Debra L. Shapiro

  • Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance

    Philip M Podsakoff;Jiing-Lih Farh

  • Teams as innovative systems: multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams.

    Gilad Chen;Jiing Lih Farh;Elizabeth M. Campbell-Bush;Zhiming Wu

  • CULTURAL RELATIVITY IN ACTION: A COMPARISON OF SELF-RATINGS MADE BY CHINESE AND U.S. WORKERS

    Jiing-Lih Farh;Gregory H. Dobbins;Bor-Shiuan Cheng

  • A field study of race and age similarity effects on interview ratings in conventional and situational interviews

    Thung-rung Lin;Gregory H. Dobbins;Jiing-lih Farh

  • Authority and Benevolence: Employees’ responses to Paternalistic Leadership in China

    Jiing Lih Farh;Bor Shiuan Cheng;Li Fang Chou;Xiao Ping Chu

  • Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When

    Cynthia Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Cynthia Lee
Cynthia Lee Northeastern University
Anne S. Tsui
Anne S. Tsui Arizona State University
Philip M. Podsakoff
Philip M. Podsakoff University of Florida
Gregory H. Dobbins
Gregory H. Dobbins University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Arthur G. Bedeian
Arthur G. Bedeian Louisiana State University
Gilad Chen
Gilad Chen University of Maryland, College Park
Zhen Xiong Chen
Zhen Xiong Chen Australian National University
Albert A. Cannella
Albert A. Cannella Texas A&M University
Riki Takeuchi
Riki Takeuchi The University of Texas at Dallas
P. Christopher Earley
P. Christopher Earley University of Technology Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse online programs and career opportunities across the United States. Many students pursue specialized tracks, such as counseling, applied behavior analysis (ABA), or clinical roles. Certification requirements and career pathways can vary widely depending on your location.

For example, those looking to become a mental health counselor in Washington DC must complete a graduate program, gain supervised experience, and pass state-specific exams. In other locations, such as Wichita, Wichita mental health counselor certification requirements include similar educational and licensing steps, but details may differ between states.

Those interested in pursuing licensure in North Carolina should be aware of the Winston Salem mental health counselor certification requirements. Additionally, if you are considering a career in applied behavior analysis, it’s valuable to understand the average aba salary in the us to guide your professional decisions.

Online psychology degrees provide flexibility while preparing you for roles in clinical practice, research, and specialized counseling areas. Wherever you plan to work, know your state’s laws and earning expectations to make informed career choices.

Best Scientists Citing Jiing-Lih Farh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles