World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip M. Podsakoff

Philip M. Podsakoff

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2210 2014 1285 1144 104 201049

Philip M. Podsakoff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip M. Podsakoff between 1975 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip M. Podsakoff published across 52 years, from 1975 to 2026, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2012. 1 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2012. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1975 2026

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip M. Podsakoff: publications per year, 1975 to 2026
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 2
1982 4
1983 1
1984 2
1985 4
1986 5
1987 2
1988 2
1989 1
1990 3
1991 2
1992 2
1993 5
1994 4
1995 3
1996 2
1997 4
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 0
2003 3
2004 1
2005 4
2006 2
2007 1
2008 4
2009 1
2010 2
2011 5
2012 8
2013 6
2014 2
2015 2
2016 1
2017 2
2018 5
2019 2
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
2025 0
2026 1
Total 111
Download as CSV

Philip M. Podsakoff publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Podsakoff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 104
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip M. Podsakoff D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Podsakoff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Philip M. Podsakoff is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily addresses topics within business, management, and psychology, focusing on organizational behavior, human resource management, decision sciences, and applied psychology.

Their recent scholarly contributions include several publications appearing predominantly in authoritative journals. These works address key themes in organizational psychology and management:

  • "Common Method Bias: It's Bad, It's Complex, It's Widespread, and It's Not Easy to Fix" (2023) published in the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • "Laying the Foundation for the Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework 2.0" (2023) published in the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • "Harnessing the power of employee voice for individual and organizational effectiveness" (2024) published in Business Horizons

Philip M. Podsakoff collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Nathan P. Podsakoff
  • Larry J. Williams
  • Chengquan Huang
  • Junhui Yang
  • Kristen J. Freiburger

The venues where this researcher most consistently publishes include:

  • Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • Business Horizons

The main fields of study explored in their work are:

  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Psychology
  • Decision Sciences

Subfields within these broader areas include:

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Applied Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

The researcher's investigations address several key topics, such as:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Organizational Learning and Leadership

Among the distinctions received, Philip M. Podsakoff has been recognized as a Dean of Fellow by the Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Jeong Yeon Lee;Nathan P. Podsakoff

  • Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Dennis W. Organ

  • Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Nathan P. Podsakoff

  • Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Julie Beth Paine;Daniel G. Bachrach

  • Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Robert H. Moorman;Richard Fetter

  • A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research

    Cheryl Burke Jarvis;Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff

  • Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences

    Dennis W. Organ;Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott Bradley MacKenzie

  • Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff;Nathan P. Podsakoff

  • Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis.

    Nathan P. Podsakoff;Steven W. Whiting;Philip M. Podsakoff;Brian D. Blume

  • Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;William H. Bommer

  • Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Quantity and Quality of Work Group Performance

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Michael Ahearne;Scott B. MacKenzie

  • Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff

  • The Problem of Measurement Model Misspecification in Behavioral and Organizational Research and Some Recommended Solutions.

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff;Cheryl Burke Jarvis

  • IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie

  • Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff;Gregory A. Rich

  • Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance

    Scott B MacKenzie;Philip M Podsakoff;Richard Fetter

  • Some possible antecedents and consequences of in-role and extra-role salesperson performance

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff;Michael Ahearne

  • The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff;Richard Fetter

  • Accounting for Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Leader Fairness and Task Scope versus Satisfaction

    Jiing-Lih Farh;Philip M. Podsakoff;Dennis W. Organ

  • The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Daniel G. Bachrach;Nathan P. Podsakoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott B. MacKenzie
Scott B. MacKenzie Indiana University
Michael Ahearne
Michael Ahearne University of Houston
Jiing-Lih Farh
Jiing-Lih Farh China Europe International Business School
William H. Bommer
William H. Bommer California State University, Fresno
Daniel G. Bachrach
Daniel G. Bachrach University of Alabama
John E. Mathieu
John E. Mathieu University of Connecticut
Chester A. Schriesheim
Chester A. Schriesheim University of Miami
William L. Gardner
William L. Gardner Texas Tech University
Michael S. Cole
Michael S. Cole Texas Christian University
Alice H. Eagly
Alice H. Eagly Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers beyond traditional clinical roles. Many students consider specializing in behavioral analysis or social work, each with distinct education and certification pathways.

For those interested in applied behavior analysis, it's important to understand credentials such as the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). If you're exploring how to become a bcba in Wisconsin, you’ll discover specific degree requirements, supervised experience, and licensing steps. Different states have their own rules; for example, the Wyoming bcba requirements outline unique steps for aspiring professionals in that region.

Social work is another popular field for psychology graduates. Becoming a licensed social worker involves completing accredited programs and obtaining state licensure. If you want to know how to become a social worker in Alabama, there are clear guidelines on degrees, fieldwork, and licensing exams. Meanwhile, the requirements to be a social worker in Alaska also include state-specific educational pathways and professional standards.

Exploring online degrees can help students balance flexibility with meeting their chosen state’s requirements for certification or licensure.

Best Scientists Citing Philip M. Podsakoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles