World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip M. Podsakoff

Philip M. Podsakoff

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
70
Citations
201049
World Ranking
2210
National Ranking
1285

Philip M. Podsakoff publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Podsakoff sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Philip M. Podsakoff D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Podsakoff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Philip M. Podsakoff is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily addresses topics within business, management, and psychology, focusing on organizational behavior, human resource management, decision sciences, and applied psychology.

Their recent scholarly contributions include several publications appearing predominantly in authoritative journals. These works address key themes in organizational psychology and management:

  • "Common Method Bias: It's Bad, It's Complex, It's Widespread, and It's Not Easy to Fix" (2023) published in the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • "Laying the Foundation for the Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework 2.0" (2023) published in the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • "Harnessing the power of employee voice for individual and organizational effectiveness" (2024) published in Business Horizons

Philip M. Podsakoff collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Nathan P. Podsakoff
  • Larry J. Williams
  • Chengquan Huang
  • Junhui Yang
  • Kristen J. Freiburger

The venues where this researcher most consistently publishes include:

  • Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • Business Horizons

The main fields of study explored in their work are:

  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Psychology
  • Decision Sciences

Subfields within these broader areas include:

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Applied Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

The researcher's investigations address several key topics, such as:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Organizational Learning and Leadership

Among the distinctions received, Philip M. Podsakoff has been recognized as a Dean of Fellow by the Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Jeong Yeon Lee;Nathan P. Podsakoff

  • Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Dennis W. Organ

  • Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Nathan P. Podsakoff

  • Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Julie Beth Paine;Daniel G. Bachrach

  • Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Robert H. Moorman;Richard Fetter

  • A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research

    Cheryl Burke Jarvis;Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff

  • Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences

    Dennis W. Organ;Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott Bradley MacKenzie

  • Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff;Nathan P. Podsakoff

  • Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis.

    Nathan P. Podsakoff;Steven W. Whiting;Philip M. Podsakoff;Brian D. Blume

  • Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;William H. Bommer

  • Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Quantity and Quality of Work Group Performance

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Michael Ahearne;Scott B. MacKenzie

  • Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff

  • The Problem of Measurement Model Misspecification in Behavioral and Organizational Research and Some Recommended Solutions.

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff;Cheryl Burke Jarvis

  • IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie

  • Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff;Gregory A. Rich

  • Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance

    Scott B MacKenzie;Philip M Podsakoff;Richard Fetter

  • Some possible antecedents and consequences of in-role and extra-role salesperson performance

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff;Michael Ahearne

  • The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance

    Scott B. MacKenzie;Philip M. Podsakoff;Richard Fetter

  • Accounting for Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Leader Fairness and Task Scope versus Satisfaction

    Jiing-Lih Farh;Philip M. Podsakoff;Dennis W. Organ

  • The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s

    Philip M. Podsakoff;Scott B. MacKenzie;Daniel G. Bachrach;Nathan P. Podsakoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott B. MacKenzie
Scott B. MacKenzie Indiana University
Michael Ahearne
Michael Ahearne University of Houston
Jiing-Lih Farh
Jiing-Lih Farh China Europe International Business School
William H. Bommer
William H. Bommer California State University, Fresno
Daniel G. Bachrach
Daniel G. Bachrach University of Alabama
John E. Mathieu
John E. Mathieu University of Connecticut
Chester A. Schriesheim
Chester A. Schriesheim University of Miami
William L. Gardner
William L. Gardner Texas Tech University
Michael S. Cole
Michael S. Cole Texas Christian University
Alice H. Eagly
Alice H. Eagly Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers beyond traditional clinical roles. Many students consider specializing in behavioral analysis or social work, each with distinct education and certification pathways.

For those interested in applied behavior analysis, it's important to understand credentials such as the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). If you're exploring how to become a bcba in Wisconsin, you’ll discover specific degree requirements, supervised experience, and licensing steps. Different states have their own rules; for example, the Wyoming bcba requirements outline unique steps for aspiring professionals in that region.

Social work is another popular field for psychology graduates. Becoming a licensed social worker involves completing accredited programs and obtaining state licensure. If you want to know how to become a social worker in Alabama, there are clear guidelines on degrees, fieldwork, and licensing exams. Meanwhile, the requirements to be a social worker in Alaska also include state-specific educational pathways and professional standards.

Exploring online degrees can help students balance flexibility with meeting their chosen state’s requirements for certification or licensure.

Best Scientists Citing Philip M. Podsakoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles