World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7776 7255 4176 3796 93 9685

Michael S. Cole publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael S. Cole between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael S. Cole published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2006. 5 of the 106 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2006. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1999 2025

106 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael S. Cole: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 2
2001 3
2002 1
2003 3
2004 9
2005 8
2006 10
2007 6
2008 2
2009 4
2010 3
2011 5
2012 8
2013 4
2014 2
2015 1
2016 2
2017 4
2018 3
2019 4
2020 3
2021 6
2022 3
2023 2
2024 2
2025 3
Total 106
Download as CSV

Michael S. Cole publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Cole sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 93
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael S. Cole D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael S. Cole sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael S. Cole is affiliated with Texas Christian University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences with a strong focus on business, management, and accounting. Cole's scholarly output reflects an interest in organizational behavior, human resource management, and social psychology, among other related disciplines.

Their recent research publications cover a range of topics within organizational and psychological contexts, including studies on stressors at work, leadership dynamics, identity effects on performance, entrepreneurial team efficacy, and peer developmental relationships. Notable recent papers include:

  • When challenges hinder: An investigation of when and how challenge stressors impact employee outcomes (2020), Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Hurry up! The role of supervisors' time urgency and self-perceived status for autocratic leadership and subordinates' well-being (2020), Personnel Psychology
  • The (in)congruence effect of leaders' narcissism identity and reputation on performance: A socioanalytic multistakeholder perspective (2021), Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Laughing All the Way to the Bank: The Joint Roles of Shared Coping Humor and Entrepreneurial Team-Efficacy in New Venture Performance (2022), Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
  • Unpacking the Microdynamics of Multiplex Peer Developmental Relationships: A Mutuality Perspective (2021), Journal of Management

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Shannon G. Taylor
  • Jeremy B. Bernerth
  • Min Z. Carter
  • Marcus M. Butts
  • Troy Wesley Pounds

Michael S. Cole has contributed to academic journals with repeated publications in these venues:

  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Journal of Management
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Personnel Psychology
  • Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

Their work predominantly addresses the following topics:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Family Business Performance and Succession
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout

The main fields of study for Cole include social sciences broadly, with a narrower concentration on business, management, and accounting. Subfields encompass sociology and political science, organizational behavior and human resource management, social psychology, general health professions, and clinical psychology.

Best Publications

  • Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationships to turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter?

    Michael S. Cole;Heike Bruch

  • Job Burnout and Employee Engagement: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Construct Proliferation

    Michael S. Cole;Frank Walter;Arthur G. Bedeian;Ernest H. O'Boyle

  • Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism

    Michael S. Cole;Heike Bruch;Bernd Vogel

  • Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: a moderated mediation study.

    Michael S. Cole;Frank Walter;Heike Bruch

  • The Workplace Social Exchange Network A Multilevel, Conceptual Examination

    Michael S. Cole;William S. Schaninger;Stanley G. Harris

  • Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines.

    Torsten Biemann;Michael S. Cole;Sven Voelpel

  • Organizational Justice and Individuals' Withdrawal: Unlocking the Influence of Emotional Exhaustion

    Michael S. Cole;Jeremy B. Bernerth;Frank Walter;Daniel T. Holt

  • Shared Authentic Leadership and New Venture Performance

    Keith M. Hmieleski;Michael S. Cole;Robert A. Baron

  • Student Learning Motivation and Psychological Hardiness: Interactive Effects on Students' Reactions to a Management Class

    Michael S. Cole;Hubert S. Feild;Stanley G. Harris

  • Emotional Intelligence: Sine Qua Non of Leadership or Folderol?

    Frank Walter;Michael S. Cole;Ronald H. Humphrey

  • Recruiters’ Perceptions and Use of Applicant Résumé Information: Screening the Recent Graduate

    Michael S. Cole;Robert S. Rubin;Hubert S. Feild;William F. Giles

  • Leader-team congruence in power distance values and team effectiveness: the mediating role of procedural justice climate.

    Michael S. Cole;Min Z. Carter;Zhen Zhang

  • Time in individual-level organizational studies: What is it, how is it used, and why isn’t it exploited more often?

    Abbie J. Shipp;Michael S. Cole

  • A Measure of Variations in Internal Social Capital among Family Firms

    Jon C. Carr;Michael S. Cole;J. Kirk Ring;Daniela P. Blettner

  • Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to unit effectiveness.

    Michael S. Cole;Heike Bruch;Bernd Vogel

  • Control Variables in Leadership Research: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review:

    Jeremy B. Bernerth;Michael S. Cole;Erik C. Taylor;H. Jack Walker

  • Exploring the implications of vision, appropriateness, and execution of organizational change

    Michael S. Cole;Stanley G. Harris;Jeremy B. Bernerth

  • The measurement equivalence of web-based and paper-and-pencil measures of transformational leadership: A multinational test

    Michael S. Cole;Arthur G. Bedeian;Hubert S. Feild

  • Recruiters’ Inferences of Applicant Personality Based on Resume Screening: Do Paper People have a Personality?

    Michael S. Cole;Hubert S. Feild;William F. Giles;Stanley G. Harris

  • Is This How I Will Be Treated? Reducing Uncertainty through Recruitment Interactions

    H. Jack Walker;Talya N. Bauer;Michael S. Cole;Jeremy B. Bernerth

Frequent Co-Authors

Hubert S. Feild
Hubert S. Feild Auburn University
Heike Bruch
Heike Bruch University of St. Gallen
Arthur G. Bedeian
Arthur G. Bedeian Louisiana State University
Boas Shamir
Boas Shamir Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ronald H. Humphrey
Ronald H. Humphrey Lancaster University
Bradley L. Kirkman
Bradley L. Kirkman North Carolina State University
Christopher C. Rosen
Christopher C. Rosen University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University
John Antonakis
John Antonakis University of Lausanne
Robert A. Baron
Robert A. Baron Oklahoma State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is a flexible field, offering a variety of online degrees and career routes across the United States. Completing a bachelor’s or master’s in psychology online opens doors to roles in mental health counseling, research, social services, and more. Each state, however, has specific steps for those seeking clinical practice.

For example, if you plan to work in Florida, you’ll need to understand how to become a licensed therapist in Tampa. Ohio has its own licensing process, so aspiring professionals there should learn how to become a licensed therapist in Toledo.

In the Southwest, it’s important to research how to become a licensed therapist in Tucson, while those looking to practice in Oklahoma can consult Tulsa licensed therapist education requirements.

By choosing an accredited online program and carefully reviewing local licensing criteria, you can set yourself up for a successful psychology career tailored to your location and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Michael S. Cole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles