World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rebecca Mitchell

Rebecca Mitchell

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
46
Citations
10612
World Ranking
3570
National Ranking
252

Rebecca Mitchell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 372 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Rebecca Mitchell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rebecca Mitchell is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia and conducts research primarily within the fields of health professions and psychology. Their scholarly work spans various subfields including general health professions, clinical psychology, social psychology, organizational behavior and human resource management, as well as sociology and political science.

Their research topics focus on aspects related to workplace and healthcare settings, covering subjects such as job satisfaction and organizational behavior, gender diversity and inequality, mental health treatment and access, patient satisfaction in healthcare, primary care and health outcomes, healthcare systems and reforms, and mental health with patient involvement.

Mitchell has contributed to a significant number of publications in well-known academic venues, including:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • PLoS ONE
  • Human Resource Management Journal
  • Journal of Business Research
  • Global Health Action

Recent published papers by Mitchell include:

  • "Too many cooks in the kitchen? The contingent curvilinear effect of shared leadership on multidisciplinary healthcare team innovation," 2020, Human Resource Management Journal
  • "Understanding the Role of Profession in Multidisciplinary Team Innovation: Professional Identity, Minority Dissent and Team Innovation," 2020, British Journal of Management
  • "Professional faultlines and interprofessional differentiation in multidisciplinary team innovation: The moderating role of inclusive leadership," 2020, Health Care Management Review

Other related research papers within their collaborative network include works on workplace stress and resilience in nursing, and leadership studies, though authored by colleagues.

Frequent collaborators with Mitchell include Brendan Boyle, Eric Badu, Anthony O'Brien, Jun Gu, and Jeffrey Braithwaite, indicating a collaborative research environment and interdisciplinary engagement.

Best Publications

  • Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research

    Christian M. Ringle;Marko Sarstedt;Rebecca Mitchell;Siegfried P. Gudergan

  • Managing Inclusiveness and Diversity in Teams: How Leader Inclusiveness Affects Performance through Status and Team Identity

    Rebecca Mitchell;Brendan Boyle;Vicki Parker;Michelle Giles

  • When do interprofessional teams succeed? Investigating the moderating roles of team and professional identity in interprofessional effectiveness

    Rebecca J Mitchell;Vicki Parker;Michelle Giles

  • Knowledge creation measurement methods

    Rebecca Mitchell;Brendan Boyle

  • Interprofessional practice and professional identity threat

    Karen Anne McNeil;Rebecca J Mitchell;Vicki Parker

  • Associations between obesity and overweight and fall risk, health status and quality of life in older people

    Rebecca J. Mitchell;Stephen R. Lord;Lara A. Harvey;Jacqueline C.T. Close

  • The Effect of Strategic Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of High‐Performance Human Resource Practices

    Rebecca Mitchell;Shatha Obeidat;Mark Bray

  • The divergent effects of transformational leadership on individual and team innovation

    Voyce Li;Rebecca Mitchell;Brendan Boyle

  • The Role of Openness to Cognitive Diversity and Group Processes in Knowledge Creation

    Rebecca Mitchell;Stephen Nicholas;Brendan Boyle

  • Workplace stress and resilience in the Australian nursing workforce: A comprehensive integrative review.

    Eric Badu;Anthony Paul O’Brien;Rebecca Mitchell;Mark Rubin

  • Professional diversity, identity salience and team innovation: The moderating role of openmindedness norms

    Rebecca Mitchell;Brendan Boyle

  • The link between high performance work practices and organizational performance

    Shatha M. Obeidat;Rebecca Mitchell;Mark Bray

  • The effectiveness of helmets in bicycle collisions with motor vehicles: a case-control study.

    Michael R. Bambach;R. J. Mitchell;Raphael H. Grzebieta;J. Olivier

  • Evaluation of an 8 hour versus a 12 hour shift roster on employees at a power station.

    Rebecca J. Mitchell;Ann M. Williamson

  • Toward Realizing the Potential of Diversity in Composition of Interprofessional Health Care Teams: An Examination of the Cognitive and Psychosocial Dynamics of Interprofessional Collaboration

    Rebecca Mitchell;Vicki Therese Parker;Michelle Giles;Nadine White

  • Obesity and falls in older people: Mediating effects of disease, sedentary behavior, mood, pain and medication use

    Rebecca J. Mitchell;Stephen R. Lord;Lara A. Harvey;Jacqueline C.T. Close

  • A study of macro-, meso- and micro-barriers and enablers affecting extended scopes of practice: the case of rural nurse practitioners in Australia

    Tony Smith;Karen McNeil;Rebecca Mitchell;Brendan Boyle

  • Knowledge creation in groups: the value of cognitive diversity, transactive memory, and openmindedness norms

    Rebecca Mitchell;Stephen Nicholas

  • Experiences and needs of parents of critically injured children during the acute hospital phase: A qualitative investigation.

    Kim Foster;Alexandra Young;Rebecca Mitchell;Connie Van

  • Knowledge Worker Control: Understanding via Principal and Agency Theory.

    Rebecca Mitchell;David Meacheam

  • A theoretical model of transformational leadership and knowledge creation: The role of open-mindedness norms and leader-member exchange

    Herman Ho Man Tse;Rebecca J Mitchell

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian Draper
Brian Draper University of New South Wales
Henry Brodaty
Henry Brodaty University of New South Wales
Jeffrey Braithwaite
Jeffrey Braithwaite Macquarie University
Kim Foster
Kim Foster Australian Catholic University
Ann Williamson
Ann Williamson University of New South Wales
Raphael H Grzebieta
Raphael H Grzebieta University of New South Wales
Andrew Bleasel
Andrew Bleasel University of Sydney
Ian D. Cameron
Ian D. Cameron University of Sydney
Stephen R. Lord
Stephen R. Lord University of New South Wales
Johanna I. Westbrook
Johanna I. Westbrook Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities have opened new pathways for students seeking flexible and accelerated education options. If you are interested in a career that makes an impact, you can now pursue a variety of specialized degrees online.

For those passionate about social work, 1 year msw programs allow you to accelerate your studies and start your career sooner. Similarly, psychology majors can take advantage of the quickest psychology degree programs to build foundations in human behavior and mental health at an accelerated pace.

If your interests lie in counseling, consider enrolling in a cacrep online masters in counseling for quality, accredited preparation in a growing field. For those interested in supporting families and relationships, an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy offers focused training for becoming a licensed therapist in this rewarding discipline.

When exploring online degrees, consider factors like accreditation, program duration, affordability, and career support to ensure your chosen pathway supports your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles