World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4525 4188 300 279 174 15084

Peter R.E. Crocker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter R.E. Crocker between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter R.E. Crocker published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2014. 1 of the 184 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2014. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1988 2025

184 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter R.E. Crocker: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 5
1993 1
1994 2
1995 6
1996 3
1997 5
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 8
2002 5
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 6
2008 6
2009 4
2010 8
2011 8
2012 10
2013 14
2014 19
2015 5
2016 10
2017 7
2018 4
2019 10
2020 6
2021 5
2022 4
2023 5
2024 0
2025 1
Total 184
Download as CSV

Peter R.E. Crocker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter R.E. Crocker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 174
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter R.E. Crocker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter R.E. Crocker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter R.E. Crocker is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and conducts research primarily in the fields of psychology, medicine, and social sciences. Their work spans several subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, developmental and educational psychology, physiology, and health.

Their research frequently addresses topics related to sport psychology and performance, eating disorders and behaviors, motivation and self-concept in sports, physical activity and health, health disparities and outcomes, emotions and moral behavior, and aging and gerontology research.

  • An examination of older men's body image: How men 65 years and older perceive, experience, and cope with their aging bodies (2020, Body Image)
  • The rebalancing act: Injured varsity women athletes' experiences of global and sport psychological well-being (2020, Psychology of Sport and Exercise)
  • Experiences With Social Participation in Group Physical Activity Programs for Older Adults (2021, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology)
  • Social support among older adults in group physical activity programs (2022, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology)
  • Conditioned pain modulation in elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, Scandinavian Journal of Pain)

Crocker's frequent collaborators include Erica Bennett, Lisa R. Trainor, Andrea Bundon, Meghan H. McDonough, and Jennifer Hewson.

Their publication record shows regular contributions to journals such as Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Body Image, Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, and Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

Best Publications

  • A six-year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: the university of Saskatchewan bone mineral accrual study.

    D. A. Bailey;H. A. Mckay;R. L. Mirwald;P. R. E. Crocker

  • Measuring general levels of physical activity: preliminary evidence for the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children.

    Peter R. E. Crocker;Donald A. Bailey;Robert A. Faulkner;Kent C. Kowalski

  • Validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children

    Kent C. Kowalski;Peter R.E. Crocker;Robert A. Faulkner

  • Convergent Validity of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents

    Kent C. Kowalski;Peter R.E. Crocker;Nanette P. Kowalski

  • Applying Self-Compassion in Sport: An Intervention With Women Athletes

    Amber D. Mosewich;Peter R.E. Crocker;Kent C. Kowalski;Anita DeLongis

  • Coping by Competitive Athletes with Performance Stress: Gender Differences and Relationships with Affect

    Peter R.E. Crocker;Thomas R. Graham

  • Children's physical activity and physical self-perceptions

    Peter R.E. Crocker;Robert C. Eklund;Kent C. Kowalski

  • A school-based exercise intervention augments bone mineral accrual in early pubertal girls.

    Kerry J. MacKelvie;Heather A. McKay;Karim M. Khan;Peter R.E. Crocker

  • Goal contents, motivation, psychological need satisfaction, well-being and physical activity: A test of self-determination theory over 6 months

    Katie E. Gunnell;Peter R.E. Crocker;Diane E. Mack;Philip M. Wilson

  • Self-compassion and women athletes' responses to emotionally difficult sport situations: An evaluation of a brief induction

    Nathan A. Reis;Kent C. Kowalski;Leah J. Ferguson;Catherine M. Sabiston

  • Gender differences in physical self-perceptions, global self-esteem and physical activity: evaluation of the physical self-perception profile model.

    Sean D. Hayes;Peter R. E. Crocker;Kent C. Kowalski

  • “The zipper effect”: Exploring the interrelationship of mental toughness and self-compassion among Canadian elite women athletes

    Danielle Wilson;Erica V. Bennett;Amber D. Mosewich;Guy E. Faulkner

  • Psychological need satisfaction and thwarting: A test of Basic Psychological Needs Theory in physical activity contexts ☆

    Katie E. Gunnell;Peter R.E. Crocker;Philip M. Wilson;Diane E. Mack

  • Testing self-determined motivation as a mediator of the relationship between psychological needs and affective and behavioral outcomes.

    Meghan H. McDonough;Peter R.E. Crocker

  • Self-compassion in the stress process in women athletes.

    Amber D. Mosewich;Catherine M. Sabiston;Kent C. Kowalski;Patrick Gaudreau

  • Managing stress by competitive athletes: ways of coping.

    Peter R. Crocker

  • A confirmatory factor analysis of the positive affect negative affect schedule (PANAS) with a youth sport sample.

    Peter R.E. Crocker

  • Development and Validation of the Coping Function Questionnaire for Adolescents in Sport

    Kent C. Kowalski;Peter R.E. Crocker

  • Psychosocial experiences of breast cancer survivors involved in a dragon boat program: exploring links to positive psychological growth.

    Catherine M. Sabiston;Meghan H. McDonough;Peter R.E. Crocker

  • Longitudinal Assessment of the Relationship Between Physical Self-Concept and Health-Related Behavior and Emotion in Adolescent Girls

    Peter R. E. Crocker;Catherine M. Sabiston;Kent C. Kowalski;Meghan H. McDonough

Frequent Co-Authors

Kent C. Kowalski
Kent C. Kowalski University of Saskatchewan
Catherine M. Sabiston
Catherine M. Sabiston University of Toronto
Katherine A. Tamminen
Katherine A. Tamminen University of Toronto
Philip M. Wilson
Philip M. Wilson Brock University
Bruno D. Zumbo
Bruno D. Zumbo University of British Columbia
Heather A. McKay
Heather A. McKay University of British Columbia
Patrick Gaudreau
Patrick Gaudreau University of Ottawa
Mark R. Beauchamp
Mark R. Beauchamp University of British Columbia
Laura Clarke
Laura Clarke European Bioinformatics Institute
Martyn Standage
Martyn Standage University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in Psychology, exploring online degree programs can help you access flexible learning opportunities that fit around your schedule. Many students pursue specializations relevant to real-world challenges—such as substance abuse counseling, an in-demand field across the USA.

Each state and city may have different steps to qualify as a counselor. For example, substance abuse counselor requirements in Corpus Christi highlight the need for specialized training and supervised experience. If you’re interested in Texas, check out how to become a substance abuse counselor in Dallas for insights into state-specific certifications and education paths.

Requirements can vary widely outside Texas as well. For instance, becoming a counselor in Colorado means meeting the substance abuse counselor requirements in Denver, which might differ from those in other states. Meanwhile, those planning a career in Michigan should review the Detroit substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand local standards.

Whether you choose to study online or on-campus, having a clear view of local licensure and education requirements is essential for building a fulfilling career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Peter R.E. Crocker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles