World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick Gaudreau

Patrick Gaudreau

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5469 5081 368 344 150 8985

Patrick Gaudreau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick Gaudreau between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick Gaudreau published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2025. 30 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2025. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 18 publications
2000 2025

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick Gaudreau: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 1
2006 2
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 10
2011 9
2012 10
2013 9
2014 14
2015 7
2016 12
2017 5
2018 8
2019 11
2020 7
2021 15
2022 10
2023 15
2024 12
2025 18
Total 196
Download as CSV

Patrick Gaudreau publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Gaudreau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 150
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick Gaudreau D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Gaudreau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patrick Gaudreau is a researcher affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada, specializing in the field of Psychology. Their work encompasses diverse subfields including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, as well as Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their research include perfectionism, procrastination, and anxiety studies; motivation and self-concept in sports; sport psychology and performance; education, achievement, and giftedness; anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes; grit, self-efficacy, and motivation; and mind wandering and attention.

Patrick Gaudreau has published extensively in several key venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology
  • British Journal of Psychology
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Their recent papers include:

  • "Because excellencism is more than good enough: On the need to distinguish the pursuit of excellence from the pursuit of perfection." (2022), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Is perfectionism a killer of creative thinking? A test of the model of excellencism and perfectionism" (2021), British Journal of Psychology
  • "Profiles of Emotion Dysregulation Among University Students Who Self-Injure: Associations with Parent-Child Relationships and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Characteristics" (2021), Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Fear of Failure Mediates the Relation Between Parental Psychological Control and Academic Outcomes: A Latent Mediated-Moderation Model of Parents' and Children's Genders" (2020), Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Separating the core definitional feature and the signature expressions of dispositional perfectionism: Implications for theory, research, and practice" (2021), Personality and Individual Differences

Their research network includes collaboration with frequent co-authors such as Benjamin J. I. Schellenberg, Jérémie Verner-Filion, Laurence Boileau, Alexandre Gareau, and Kristina Kljajić.

Best Publications

  • Latent Class Growth Modelling: A Tutorial

    Heather Andruff;Natasha Carraro;Amanda Thompson;Patrick Gaudreau

  • Testing a 2 × 2 model of dispositional perfectionism

    Patrick Gaudreau;Amanda Thompson

  • Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of coping strategies employed by athletes in competitive sport settings

    Patrick Gaudreau;Jean-Pierre Blondin

  • Positive and negative affective states in a performance-related setting: Testing the factorial structure of the panas across two samples of french-canadian participants.

    Patrick Gaudreau;Xavier Sanchez;Jean-Pierre Blondin

  • Spontaneous and experimentally induced action planning and coping planning for physical activity: A meta-analysis

    Natasha Carraro;Patrick Gaudreau

  • Self-compassion in the stress process in women athletes.

    Amber D. Mosewich;Catherine M. Sabiston;Kent C. Kowalski;Patrick Gaudreau

  • Self-Determination, Coping, and Goal Attainment in Sport

    Catherine E. Amiot;Patrick Gaudreau;Céline M. Blanchard

  • Employee empowerment: From managerial practices to employees' behavioral empowerment

    Jean‐Sébastien Boudrias;Patrick Gaudreau;André Savoie;Alexandre J.S. Morin

  • Athletes Broad Dimensions of Dispositional Perfectionism: Examining Changes in Life Satisfaction and the Mediating Role of Sport-Related Motivation and Coping

    Patrick Gaudreau;Sheilah Antl

  • Athletes' coping during a competition: relationship of coping strategies with positive affect, negative affect, and performance–goal discrepancy

    P Gaudreau;J.-P Blondin;A.-M Lapierre

  • The advantages of partialling perfectionistic strivings and perfectionistic concerns: Critical issues and recommendations

    Joachim Stoeber;Patrick Gaudreau

  • Different athletes cope differently during a sport competition: a cluster analysis of coping

    Patrick Gaudreau;Jean-Pierre Blondin

  • Does it take three to tango? Psychological need satisfaction and athlete burnout.

    S. Perreault;P. Gaudreau;M. C. Lapointe;C. Lacroix

  • Modeling the Experience of Psychological Health at Work: The Role of Personal Resources, Social- Organizational Resources, and Job Demands

    Jean-Sébastien Boudrias;Pascale Desrumaux;Patrick Gaudreau;Katia Nelson

  • Dispositional perfectionism and well-being: A test of the 2 × 2 model of perfectionism in the sport domain.

    Patrick Gaudreau;Jérémie Verner-Filion

  • Bolstering Implementation Plans for the Long Haul: The Benefits of Simultaneously Boosting Self-Concordance or Self-Efficacy

    Richard Koestner;E. J. Horberg;Patrick Gaudreau;Theodore Powers

  • Can high-intensity exercise be more pleasant?: attentional dissociation using music and video.

    Leighton Jones;Costas I. Karageorghis;Panteleimon Ekkekakis

  • Differential Associations of Dispositional Optimism and Pessimism With Coping, Goal Attainment, and Emotional Adjustment During Sport Competition.

    Patrick Gaudreau;Jean-Pierre Blondin

  • Passion and Coping: Relationships With Changes in Burnout and Goal Attainment in Collegiate Volleyball Players

    Benjamin J I Schellenberg;Patrick Gaudreau;Peter R E Crocker

  • How to Use the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) To Estimate Different Dyadic Patterns in MPLUS: A Step-by-Step Tutorial

    Josée Fitzpatrick;Alexandre Gareau;Marie-France Lafontaine;Patrick Gaudreau

  • The Ups and Downs of Coping and Sport Achievement: An Episodic Process Analysis of Within-Person Associations

    Patrick Gaudreau;Adam Nicholls;Andrew R. Levy

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter R.E. Crocker
Peter R.E. Crocker University of British Columbia
Catherine M. Sabiston
Catherine M. Sabiston University of Toronto
Marie-France Lafontaine
Marie-France Lafontaine University of Ottawa
Katherine A. Tamminen
Katherine A. Tamminen University of Toronto
Richard Koestner
Richard Koestner McGill University
Robert J. Vallerand
Robert J. Vallerand University of Quebec at Montreal
Catherine E. Amiot
Catherine E. Amiot University of Quebec at Montreal
Kent C. Kowalski
Kent C. Kowalski University of Saskatchewan
Alexandre J. S. Morin
Alexandre J. S. Morin Concordia University
George K. Georgiou
George K. Georgiou University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a range of rewarding online degrees and career paths. Many students are drawn to specialized fields like substance abuse counseling. Each state and even specific cities have unique requirements for entering this profession, so it’s important to research them thoroughly.

For example, if you are interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Lubbock, you’ll need to meet specific educational and clinical training standards set by Texas. Similarly, the path to becoming a substance abuse counselor in Madison involves its own licensing criteria and focus areas.

In Tennessee, Memphis substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight the need for both accredited instruction and hands-on experience. Meanwhile, for those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Mesa, Arizona has its own certification process.

Online psychology degrees and targeted certificate programs can help you meet these regional requirements. Carefully consider educational pathways that offer both academic knowledge and practical training to ensure you are well-prepared for your chosen career trajectory.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Gaudreau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles