World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
35552
World Ranking
6335
National Ranking
3379

Heinrich R. Schelbert publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heinrich R. Schelbert sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 475 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Heinrich R. Schelbert D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heinrich R. Schelbert sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Heinrich R. Schelbert is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Rheumatology, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's work centers on several key topics including:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Frequent publication venues for Schelbert include:

  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Clinical Nuclear Medicine
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of the American Heart Association

The scientist has collaborated frequently with the following coauthors:

  • Juhani Knuuti
  • Robert J. Gropler
  • Vasken Dilsizian
  • Artineh Hayrapetian
  • Wolfgang Weber

Notable recent publications of Heinrich R. Schelbert include:

  • "The Future of Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Theranostics," 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • "Myocardial Perfusion PET for the Detection and Reporting of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction," 2023, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • "Assessment of cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with heart failure by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging," 2020, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • "Incidental Detection of Elastofibroma Dorsi With 68Ga-FAPI-46 and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Patient With Esophageal Cancer," 2020, Clinical Nuclear Medicine
  • "Interplay Between Systemic Inflammation, Myocardial Injury, and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From the LiiRA Study," 2024, Journal of the American Heart Association

Best Publications

  • Reversibility of Cardiac Wall-Motion Abnormalities Predicted by Positron Tomography

    Jan Tillisch;Richard Brunken;Robert Marshall;Markus Schwaiger

  • Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making.

    K. Lance Gould;Nils P. Johnson;Timothy M. Bateman;Rob S. Beanlands

  • Value of metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography for evaluating prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction

    Marcelo F. Di Carli;Michael Davidson;Roderick Little;Sandeep Khanna

  • Noninvasive quantification of regional blood flow in the human heart using N-13 ammonia and dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging

    Gary D. Hutchins;Markus Schwaiger;Karen C. Rosenspire;Janine Krivokapich

  • Positron emission tomography and autoradiography: Principles and applications for the brain and heart

    Michael E. Phelps;John C. Mazziotta;Heinrich R. Schelbert

  • N-13 ammonia as an indicator of myocardial blood flow.

    H R Schelbert;M E Phelps;S C Huang;N S MacDonald

  • Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve.

    J. Czernin;P. Müller;Sammy Chan;R. C. Brunken

  • Quantitative Relation Between Myocardial Viability and Improvement in Heart Failure Symptoms After Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

    M. F. Di Carli;Farbod Asgarzadie;H. R. Schelbert;R. C. Brunken

  • Identification and differentiation of resting myocardial ischemia and infarction in man with positron computed tomography, 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose and N-13 ammonia.

    Robert C. Marshall;Jan H. Tillisch;Michael E. Phelps;Sung-cheng Huang

  • ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures.

    Vasken Dilsizian;Stephen L. Bacharach;Rob S. Beanlands;Steven R. Bergmann

  • Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006.

    Johannes Czernin;Martin Allen-Auerbach;Heinrich R Schelbert

  • Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses with myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. V. Detection of 47 percent diameter coronary stenosis with intravenous nitrogen-13 ammonia and emission-computed tomography in intact dogs.

    K. Lance Gould;Heinrich R. Schelbert;Michael E. Phelps;Edward J. Hoffman

  • Relation Among Stenosis Severity, Myocardial Blood Flow, and Flow Reserve in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

    Marcelo Di Carli;Johannes Czernin;Carl K. Hoh;Victor H. Gerbaudo

  • Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health

    Thomas H. Schindler;Heinrich R. Schelbert;Alessandra Quercioli;Vasken Dilsizian

  • Regional perfusion, glucose metabolism, and wall motion in patients with chronic electrocardiographic Q wave infarctions: evidence for persistence of viable tissue in some infarct regions by positron emission tomography.

    R Brunken;J Tillisch;M Schwaiger;J S Child

  • Simple noninvasive quantification method for measuring myocardial glucose utilization in humans employing positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 deoxyglucose.

    Sanjiv S. Gambhir;Markus Schwaiger;Sung-Cheng Huang;Janine Krivokapich

  • Positron Tomography with Deoxyglucose for Estimating Local Myocardial Glucose Metabolism

    Osman Ratib;Michael E. Phelps;Sung-Cheng Huang;Eberhard Henze

  • Long-term survival of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: implications for the role of myocardial viability assessment in management decisions.

    Marcelo F. Di Carli;Jamshid Maddahi;Sepehr Rokhsar;Heinrich R. Schelbert

  • Positron emission tomography detects tissue metabolic activity in myocardial segments with persistent thallium perfusion defects

    Richard Brunken;Markus Schwaiger;Maleah Grover-McKay;Michael E. Phelps

  • ASNC IMAGING GUIDELINES/SNMMI PROCEDURE STANDARD ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures

    Vasken Dilsizian;Stephen L. Bacharach;Rob S. Beanlands;Steven R. Bergmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael E. Phelps
Michael E. Phelps University of California, Los Angeles
Sung-Cheng Huang
Sung-Cheng Huang University of California, Los Angeles
Johannes Czernin
Johannes Czernin University of California, Los Angeles
Jorge R. Barrio
Jorge R. Barrio University of California, Los Angeles
James Sayre
James Sayre University of California, Los Angeles
Markus Schwaiger
Markus Schwaiger Technical University of Munich
Sanjiv S. Gambhir
Sanjiv S. Gambhir Stanford University
Carl K. Hoh
Carl K. Hoh University of California, San Diego
Marcelo F. Di Carli
Marcelo F. Di Carli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Heiko Schöder
Heiko Schöder Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways and specialties in healthcare is increasingly popular for those interested in medicine. Online programs offer unique flexibility—allowing many students to balance their studies with work or family commitments.

If you’re looking for a non-traditional approach to advanced nursing, some schools offer a dnp program without clinical hours. This can be attractive for experienced nurses seeking a doctorate degree while bypassing the on-site requirements.

Those eager to enter the nursing profession quickly may consider the fastest lpn program, which enables students to start their healthcare career in less time than traditional programs. For those interested in mental health, numerous pmhnp online programs prepare graduates to serve an increasing need for psychiatric care providers.

For a broader route into hospital or healthcare management, a health care administration degree online can pave the way to leadership roles across the healthcare sector.

These online pathways can accelerate your education, diversify your skill set, and help you reach your career goals in the dynamic world of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Heinrich R. Schelbert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles