World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
29556
World Ranking
10556
National Ranking
5432

Heiko Schöder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heiko Schöder sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 501 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Heiko Schöder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heiko Schöder sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Heiko Schöder is a researcher affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their work spans multiple areas within medicine, focusing predominantly on radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, and oncology. Schöder's publication record reflects a diversified approach integrating clinical and diagnostic advancements in cancer treatment and medical imaging techniques.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine

Within this broad field, Schöder specializes in several subfields:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Genetics

Schöder's research concentrates on topics such as:

  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research

The scientist has published extensively in leading journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Blood
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Hematological Oncology

Some of Schöder's recent notable papers include:

  • "Brown adipose tissue is associated with cardiometabolic health," 2021, Nature Medicine
  • "Radiotheranostics in oncology: current challenges and emerging opportunities," 2022, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • "PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0," 2023, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • "Joint EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline for the use of 177Lu-labeled PSMA-targeted radioligand-therapy (177Lu-PSMA-RLT)," 2023, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • "Phase II Trial of Pembrolizumab Plus Gemcitabine, Vinorelbine, and Liposomal Doxorubicin as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma," 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Collaborations form an important component of Schöder's output, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Gilles Salles
  • Alison J. Moskowitz
  • Andrew D. Zelenetz
  • Paul A. Hamlin
  • Ariela Noy

Best Publications

  • Clinical translation of an ultrasmall inorganic optical-PET imaging nanoparticle probe

    Evan Phillips;Oula Penate-Medina;Pat B. Zanzonico;Richard D. Carvajal

  • 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0.

    Wolfgang P. Fendler;Wolfgang P. Fendler;Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Mohsen Beheshti;Jamshed Bomanji

  • Brown adipose tissue is associated with cardiometabolic health

    Tobias Becher;Tobias Becher;Srikanth Palanisamy;Srikanth Palanisamy;Daniel J. Kramer;Daniel J. Kramer;Daniel J. Kramer;Mahmoud Eljalby;Mahmoud Eljalby

  • Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial

    Wolfgang P Fendler;Wolfgang P Fendler;Jeremie Calais;Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Robert R Flavell

  • Effect of Respiratory Gating on Quantifying PET Images of Lung Cancer

    Sadek A. Nehmeh;Yusuf E. Erdi;Clifton C. Ling;Kenneth E. Rosenzweig

  • Four-dimensional (4D) PET/CT imaging of the thorax.

    S. A. Nehmeh;Y. E. Erdi;T. Pan;A. Pevsner

  • Intensity of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Positron Emission Tomography Distinguishes Between Indolent and Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

    Heiko Schöder;Ariela Noy;Mithat Gönen;Lijun Weng

  • Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion.

    Heiko Schöder;Henry W. D. Yeung;Mithat Gonen;Dennis Kraus

  • Positron emission tomography for prostate, bladder, and renal cancer.

    Heiko Schöder;Steven M. Larson

  • The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs

    Yusuf E. Erdi;Sadek A. Nehmeh;Tinsu Pan;Alexander Pevsner

  • International Working Group consensus response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017)

    A Younes;P Hilden;B Coiffier;A Hagenbeek

  • Risk-Adapted Dose-Dense Immunochemotherapy Determined by Interim FDG-PET in Advanced-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

    Craig H. Moskowitz;Heiko Schöder;Julie Teruya-Feldstein;Camelia Sima

  • Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

    R. J. Wong;D. T. Lin;H. Schöder;S. G. Patel

  • Patterns of (18)F-FDG uptake in adipose tissue and muscle: a potential source of false-positives for PET.

    Henry W D Yeung;Ravinder K Grewal;Mithat Gonen;Heiko Schöder

  • Clinical Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Assessing the Neck After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

    Seng Chuan Ong;Heiko Schöder;Nancy Y. Lee;Snehal G. Patel

  • Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R Compared With R-CHOP as Frontline Therapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Clinical Outcomes of the Phase III Intergroup Trial Alliance/CALGB 50303

    Nancy L. Bartlett;Wyndham H. Wilson;Sin Ho Jung;Eric D. Hsi

  • Selective CDK4/6 inhibition with tumor responses by PD0332991 in patients with mantle cell lymphoma

    John P. Leonard;Ann S. LaCasce;Mitchell R. Smith;Ariela Noy

  • 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged N0 by clinical examination and CT/MRI.

    Heiko Schöder;Diane L. Carlson;Dennis H. Kraus;Hilda E. Stambuk

  • EANM procedure guidelines for radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-labelled PSMA-ligands (177Lu-PSMA-RLT).

    Clemens Kratochwil;Wolfgang Peter Fendler;Matthias Eiber;Richard Baum

  • Normalization of pre-ASCT, FDG-PET imaging with second-line, non-cross resistant, chemotherapy programs improves event-free survival in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma

    Craig H. Moskowitz;Matt J. Matasar;Andrew D. Zelenetz;Stephen D. Nimer

Frequent Co-Authors

John L. Humm
John L. Humm Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Steven M. Larson
Steven M. Larson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Craig H. Moskowitz
Craig H. Moskowitz University of Miami
Nancy Y. Lee
Nancy Y. Lee Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Andrew D. Zelenetz
Andrew D. Zelenetz Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Mithat Gonen
Mithat Gonen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David J. Straus
David J. Straus Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Joachim Yahalom
Joachim Yahalom Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Wolfgang A. Weber
Wolfgang A. Weber Technical University of Munich
Nancy L. Bartlett
Nancy L. Bartlett Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine opens the door to a variety of related fields that can be pursued entirely online. For those interested in preventative health and wellness, online nutrition degree programs are a flexible choice, equipping students with the knowledge to guide healthy lifestyle decisions.

If your goal is healthcare management rather than clinical practice, pursuing one of the cahme accredited online mha programs can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals or health organizations. These programs provide essential skills in healthcare policy, management, and operations.

Registered Nurses looking to advance can also find accessible pathway options, such as online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, allowing for career progression without the need for additional in-person clinicals.

For those pursuing the highest levels of nursing practice, the fastest dnp online program offers a streamlined route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice, enabling nurses to expand their clinical expertise and leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Heiko Schöder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles