World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10555 9909 5431 5017 501 29556

Heiko Schöder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Heiko Schöder between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Heiko Schöder published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 22.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 93 publications in 2023. 46 of the 670 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 93. Peak 93 publications in 2023. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 54 publications 2022: 52 publications 2023: 93 publications 2024: 44 publications 2025: 43 publications 2026: 3 publications
1997 2026

670 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Heiko Schöder: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 3
1999 5
2000 3
2001 2
2002 4
2003 4
2004 12
2005 9
2006 14
2007 14
2008 18
2009 11
2010 27
2011 19
2012 21
2013 27
2014 24
2015 21
2016 30
2017 28
2018 17
2019 34
2020 33
2021 54
2022 52
2023 93
2024 44
2025 43
2026 3
Total 670
Download as CSV

Heiko Schöder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heiko Schöder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 501 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 501
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Heiko Schöder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heiko Schöder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Heiko Schöder is a researcher affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their work spans multiple areas within medicine, focusing predominantly on radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, and oncology. Schöder's publication record reflects a diversified approach integrating clinical and diagnostic advancements in cancer treatment and medical imaging techniques.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine

Within this broad field, Schöder specializes in several subfields:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Genetics

Schöder's research concentrates on topics such as:

  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research

The scientist has published extensively in leading journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Blood
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Hematological Oncology

Some of Schöder's recent notable papers include:

  • "Brown adipose tissue is associated with cardiometabolic health," 2021, Nature Medicine
  • "Radiotheranostics in oncology: current challenges and emerging opportunities," 2022, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • "PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0," 2023, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • "Joint EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline for the use of 177Lu-labeled PSMA-targeted radioligand-therapy (177Lu-PSMA-RLT)," 2023, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • "Phase II Trial of Pembrolizumab Plus Gemcitabine, Vinorelbine, and Liposomal Doxorubicin as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma," 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Collaborations form an important component of Schöder's output, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Gilles Salles
  • Alison J. Moskowitz
  • Andrew D. Zelenetz
  • Paul A. Hamlin
  • Ariela Noy

Best Publications

  • Clinical translation of an ultrasmall inorganic optical-PET imaging nanoparticle probe

    Evan Phillips;Oula Penate-Medina;Pat B. Zanzonico;Richard D. Carvajal

  • 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0.

    Wolfgang P. Fendler;Wolfgang P. Fendler;Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Mohsen Beheshti;Jamshed Bomanji

  • Brown adipose tissue is associated with cardiometabolic health

    Tobias Becher;Tobias Becher;Srikanth Palanisamy;Srikanth Palanisamy;Daniel J. Kramer;Daniel J. Kramer;Daniel J. Kramer;Mahmoud Eljalby;Mahmoud Eljalby

  • Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial

    Wolfgang P Fendler;Wolfgang P Fendler;Jeremie Calais;Matthias Eiber;Matthias Eiber;Robert R Flavell

  • Effect of Respiratory Gating on Quantifying PET Images of Lung Cancer

    Sadek A. Nehmeh;Yusuf E. Erdi;Clifton C. Ling;Kenneth E. Rosenzweig

  • Four-dimensional (4D) PET/CT imaging of the thorax.

    S. A. Nehmeh;Y. E. Erdi;T. Pan;A. Pevsner

  • Intensity of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Positron Emission Tomography Distinguishes Between Indolent and Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

    Heiko Schöder;Ariela Noy;Mithat Gönen;Lijun Weng

  • Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion.

    Heiko Schöder;Henry W. D. Yeung;Mithat Gonen;Dennis Kraus

  • Positron emission tomography for prostate, bladder, and renal cancer.

    Heiko Schöder;Steven M. Larson

  • The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs

    Yusuf E. Erdi;Sadek A. Nehmeh;Tinsu Pan;Alexander Pevsner

  • International Working Group consensus response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017)

    A Younes;P Hilden;B Coiffier;A Hagenbeek

  • Risk-Adapted Dose-Dense Immunochemotherapy Determined by Interim FDG-PET in Advanced-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

    Craig H. Moskowitz;Heiko Schöder;Julie Teruya-Feldstein;Camelia Sima

  • Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

    R. J. Wong;D. T. Lin;H. Schöder;S. G. Patel

  • Patterns of (18)F-FDG uptake in adipose tissue and muscle: a potential source of false-positives for PET.

    Henry W D Yeung;Ravinder K Grewal;Mithat Gonen;Heiko Schöder

  • Clinical Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Assessing the Neck After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

    Seng Chuan Ong;Heiko Schöder;Nancy Y. Lee;Snehal G. Patel

  • Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R Compared With R-CHOP as Frontline Therapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Clinical Outcomes of the Phase III Intergroup Trial Alliance/CALGB 50303

    Nancy L. Bartlett;Wyndham H. Wilson;Sin Ho Jung;Eric D. Hsi

  • Selective CDK4/6 inhibition with tumor responses by PD0332991 in patients with mantle cell lymphoma

    John P. Leonard;Ann S. LaCasce;Mitchell R. Smith;Ariela Noy

  • 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged N0 by clinical examination and CT/MRI.

    Heiko Schöder;Diane L. Carlson;Dennis H. Kraus;Hilda E. Stambuk

  • EANM procedure guidelines for radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-labelled PSMA-ligands (177Lu-PSMA-RLT).

    Clemens Kratochwil;Wolfgang Peter Fendler;Matthias Eiber;Richard Baum

  • Normalization of pre-ASCT, FDG-PET imaging with second-line, non-cross resistant, chemotherapy programs improves event-free survival in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma

    Craig H. Moskowitz;Matt J. Matasar;Andrew D. Zelenetz;Stephen D. Nimer

Frequent Co-Authors

John L. Humm
John L. Humm Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Steven M. Larson
Steven M. Larson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Craig H. Moskowitz
Craig H. Moskowitz University of Miami
Nancy Y. Lee
Nancy Y. Lee Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Andrew D. Zelenetz
Andrew D. Zelenetz Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Mithat Gonen
Mithat Gonen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David J. Straus
David J. Straus Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Joachim Yahalom
Joachim Yahalom Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Wolfgang A. Weber
Wolfgang A. Weber Technical University of Munich
Nancy L. Bartlett
Nancy L. Bartlett Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine opens the door to a variety of related fields that can be pursued entirely online. For those interested in preventative health and wellness, online nutrition degree programs are a flexible choice, equipping students with the knowledge to guide healthy lifestyle decisions.

If your goal is healthcare management rather than clinical practice, pursuing one of the cahme accredited online mha programs can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals or health organizations. These programs provide essential skills in healthcare policy, management, and operations.

Registered Nurses looking to advance can also find accessible pathway options, such as online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, allowing for career progression without the need for additional in-person clinicals.

For those pursuing the highest levels of nursing practice, the fastest dnp online program offers a streamlined route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice, enabling nurses to expand their clinical expertise and leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Heiko Schöder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles