World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
9499
World Ranking
5463
National Ranking
79

Martin Forsius publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Forsius sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 159 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Martin Forsius D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Forsius sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Forsius is affiliated with the Finnish Environment Institute in Finland and works primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their research focuses on several subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, Ecology, General Health Professions, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Their main research topics include forest management and policy, soil and water nutrient dynamics, peatlands and wetlands ecology, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, forest ecology and management, conservation, biodiversity, and resource management, as well as hydrology and watershed management studies.

Forsius has contributed multiple papers spanning from 2020 to 2024. Among their recent publications are:

  • "Assessing critical load exceedances and ecosystem impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen and sulphur deposition at unmanaged forested catchments in Europe" (2020) published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Developing a spatially explicit modelling and evaluation framework for integrated carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation: Application in southern Finland" (2021) published in The Science of The Total Environment

Additionally, Forsius has collaborated with several frequent co-authors including Maria Holmberg, Annikki Mäkelä, Francesco Minunno, Virpi Junttila, and Mikko Peltoniemi, indicating an active engagement in multidisciplinary and collaborative research efforts.

They have published extensively in multiple scientific venues, especially AMBIO, where they have contributed eight publications. Other frequently published venues include Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), The Science of The Total Environment, and ARPHA Conference Abstracts.

Martin Forsius also has a presence in book publications, with a noted contribution to TemaNord, specifically the book titled Policy Brief: Nitrogen budgets and the link to carbon sequestration in the Nordic forests published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry.

    Donald T. Monteith;John L. Stoddard;Christopher D. Evans;Heleen A. de Wit

  • Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe

    J. L. Stoddard;D. S. Jeffries;A. Lükewille;T. A. Clair

  • Nitrogen input together with ecosystem nitrogen enrichment predict nitrate leaching from European forests

    Jannette MacDonald;Nancy Dise;Egbert Matzner;Martin Armbruster

  • Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services

    Bojie Fu;Shuai Wang;Changhong Su;Martin Forsius

  • Acid rain and air pollution: 50 years of progress in environmental science and policy

    Peringe Grennfelt;Anna Engleryd;Martin Forsius;Øystein Hov

  • The urgency of Arctic change

    James E Overland;Edward Dunlea;Jason E. Box;Robert Corell

  • Genesis, goals and achievements of Long-Term Ecological Research at the global scale: A critical review of ILTER and future directions.

    M. Mirtl;M. Mirtl;E. T. Borer;I. Djukic;M. Forsius

  • Evaluation of organic horizon C:N ratio as an indicator of nitrate leaching in conifer forests across Europe

    Nancy Dise;Egbert Matzner;M. Forsius

  • Increasing trends of total organic carbon concentrations in small forest lakes in Finland from 1987 to 2003.

    Jussi Vuorenmaa;Martin Forsius;Jaakko Mannio

  • Forest floor vegetation response to nitrogen deposition in Europe

    Thomas Dirnböck;Ulf Grandin;Markus Bernhardt-Römermann;Burkhardt Beudert

  • How Essential Biodiversity Variables and remote sensing can help national biodiversity monitoring

    Petteri Vihervaara;Ari-Pekka Auvinen;Laura Mononen;Markus Törmä

  • Recovery of Acidified European Surface Waters

    Richard F. Wright;Thorjørn Larssen;Lluis Camarero;Bernard J. Cosby

  • Towards A Long-Term Integrated Monitoring Programme In Europe: Network Design in Theory and Practice

    T. W. Parr;M. Ferretti;I. C. Simpson;M. Forsius

  • A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: Methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1

    J. Maes;L.C. Braat;K. Jax;M. Hutchins

  • Towards Harmonizing Leaf Litter Decomposition Studies Using Standard Tea Bags—A Field Study and Model Application

    Markus Didion;Anna Repo;Jari Liski;Martin Forsius

  • ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING Exceedance of Critical Loads for Lakes in Finland, Norway, and Sweden: Reduction Requirements for Acidifying Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition

    Maximilian Posch;Juha Kämäri;Martin Forsius;Arne Henriksen

  • How many fish populations in Finland are affected by acid precipitation

    Martti Rask;Jaakko Mannio;Martin Forsius;Maximilian Posch

  • Long-term changes (1990-2015) in the atmospheric deposition and runoff water chemistry of sulphate, inorganic nitrogen and acidity for forested catchments in Europe in relation to changes in emissions and hydrometeorological conditions.

    Jussi Vuorenmaa;Algirdas Augustaitis;Burkhard Beudert;Witold Bochenek

  • Modelling the effect of climate change on recovery of acidified freshwaters : Relative sensitivity of individual processes in the MAGIC model

    R. F. Wright;J. Aherne;Kevin Bishop;Lluís Camarero

  • An application of artificial neural networks to carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in three boreal streams and impacts of climate change

    Maria Holmberg;Martin Forsius;Michael Starr;Markus Huttunen

  • Impacts of forest biomass removal on soil nutrient status under climate change: a catchment-based modelling study for Finland

    Julian Aherne;Maximilian Posch;Martin Forsius;Aleksi Lehtonen

Frequent Co-Authors

Maximilian Posch
Maximilian Posch International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Julian Aherne
Julian Aherne Trent University
Mike Starr
Mike Starr University of Helsinki
Richard F. Wright
Richard F. Wright Norwegian Institute for Water Research
Pirkko Kortelainen
Pirkko Kortelainen Finnish Environment Institute
Filip Moldan
Filip Moldan Czech Academy of Sciences
Thomas Dirnböck
Thomas Dirnböck Environment Agency
Lauri Arvola
Lauri Arvola University of Helsinki
Chris D. Evans
Chris D. Evans UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Alan Jenkins
Alan Jenkins UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a range of interdisciplinary careers in science, health, and the environment. Online degree programs make it easier for students to pivot into new fields or deepen expertise while balancing other commitments.

Many students with a science background consider fields beyond ecology, such as communication sciences or nursing. For example, speech pathology bridge programs provide a pathway for non-SLP majors to qualify for advanced study in speech-language pathology.

Similarly, for those interested in healthcare, there are options like the non nursing degree to bsn online, which allows individuals with bachelor’s degrees in other subjects to rapidly transition into nursing careers. Graduates may then pursue advanced roles, such as nurse practitioners, thanks to fast track nurse practitioner programs, which can shorten the traditional educational timeline.

Additionally, for those looking at career outcomes, understanding compensation is important. Learn about the regional differences in psychiatric np salary to make informed decisions about your future. These pathways highlight the flexibility and opportunities that online programs provide, even beyond ecology and evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Forsius

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles