World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
9070
World Ranking
5237
National Ranking
43

Maximilian Posch publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian Posch sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 203 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Maximilian Posch D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian Posch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maximilian Posch is affiliated with the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on Medicine and Environmental Science. Within these broader areas, Posch's work includes specialties such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Genetics, Atmospheric Science, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Immunology.

Their publications cover a range of scientific topics. Key areas include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency

Posch's recent scientific papers include:

  • "Assessment of the anti-CD40 antibody iscalimab in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study" (2020), published in The Lancet Rheumatology
  • "Long-term rise in riverine dissolved organic carbon concentration is predicted by electrolyte solubility theory" (2023), published in Science Advances
  • "Assessing critical load exceedances and ecosystem impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen and sulphur deposition at unmanaged forested catchments in Europe" (2020), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Assessing the costs and environmental benefits of IMO regulations of ship-originated SOx and NOx emissions in the Baltic Sea" (2021), published in AMBIO
  • "Metabolic, Intestinal, and Cardiovascular Effects of Sotagliflozin Compared With Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study" (2022), published in Diabetes Care

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Posch include Alan Kivitz, Heleen A. de Wit, Pavel Krám, Niklas Walther, and G.W.W. Wamelink, each having contributed to multiple publications together.

Their work has appeared in several scientific journals, with multiple publications in Environmental Pollution. Other notable venues featuring their research include:

  • The Lancet Rheumatology
  • Science Advances
  • BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
  • The Science of The Total Environment

Best Publications

  • Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: Modeling and policy applications

    Markus Amann;Imrich Bertok;Jens Borken-Kleefeld;Janusz Cofala

  • A Global Analysis of Acidification and Eutrophication of Terrestrial Ecosystems

    A. F. Bouwman;D. P. Van Vuuren;R. G. Derwent;M. Posch

  • Country-dependent Characterisation Factors for Acidification and Terrestrial Eutrophication Based on Accumulated Exceedance as an Impact Category Indicator (14 pp)

    Jyri Seppälä;Maximilian Posch;Matti Johansson;Jean-Paul Hettelingh

  • Long-term development of acid deposition (1880–2030) in sensitive freshwater regions in Europe

    Wolfgang Schöpp;Maximilian Posch;Sophia Mylona;Matti Johansson;Matti Johansson

  • Simulation of the long-term soil response to acid deposition in various buffer ranges

    W. De Vries;M. Posch;J. Kämäri

  • The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA

    Maximilian Posch;Jyri Seppälä;Jean Paul Hettelingh;Matti Johansson

  • Impact of excess NOx emissions from diesel cars on air quality, public health and eutrophication in Europe

    J. E. Jonson;J. Borken-Kleefeld;David Simpson;David Simpson;A. Nyiri

  • From acid rain to climate change

    S. Reis;P. Grennfelt;Z. Klimont;M. Amann

  • Large impacts of climatic warming on growth of boreal forests since 1960.

    Pekka E. Kauppi;Maximilian Posch;Pentti Pirinen

  • Recovery of Acidified European Surface Waters

    Richard F. Wright;Thorjørn Larssen;Lluis Camarero;Bernard J. Cosby

  • Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of annual phosphorus load estimates from two agricultural basins in Finland

    Seppo Rekolainen;Maximilian Posch;Juha Kämäri;Petri Ekholm

  • The use of critical loads in emission reduction agreements in Europe

    J. P. Hettelingh;M. Posch;P. A. M. De Smet;R. J. Downing

  • Steady-State Models for Calculating Critical Loads of Acidity for Surface Waters

    Unknown

  • Impacts of climate and emission changes on nitrogen deposition in Europe: a multi-model study

    David Simpson;David Simpson;Camilla Andersson;Jesper Heile Christensen;Magnuz Engardt

  • Sensitivity of boreal forests to possible climatic warming.

    Pekka Kauppi;Maximilian Posch

  • Modeling sediment yield and phosphorus transport in Finnish clayey soils

    Sirkka Tattari;Ilona Bärlund;Seppo Rekolainen;Maximilian Posch

  • Analysis of Policy Measures to Reduce Ship Emissions in the Context of the Revision of the National Emissions Ceilings Directive

    J. Cofala;M. Amann;C. Heyes;F. Wagner

  • Critical loads of acidity for surface waters

    Unknown

  • Modelling the impact of nitrogen deposition, climate change and nutrient limitations on tree carbon sequestration in Europe for the period 1900–2050

    Wim de Vries;Maximilian Posch

  • ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING Exceedance of Critical Loads for Lakes in Finland, Norway, and Sweden: Reduction Requirements for Acidifying Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition

    Maximilian Posch;Juha Kämäri;Martin Forsius;Arne Henriksen

  • How many fish populations in Finland are affected by acid precipitation

    Martti Rask;Jaakko Mannio;Martin Forsius;Maximilian Posch

  • Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems in Europe; technical report 2002

    W. de Vries;G.J. Reinds;H. van Dobben;D. de Zwart

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Forsius
Martin Forsius Finnish Environment Institute
Pekka E. Kauppi
Pekka E. Kauppi University of Helsinki
Markus Amann
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Julian Aherne
Julian Aherne Trent University
Wim de Vries
Wim de Vries Wageningen University & Research
Zbigniew Klimont
Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
David Simpson
David Simpson Chalmers University of Technology
Chris Heyes
Chris Heyes International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Bernard J. Cosby
Bernard J. Cosby University of Virginia
Josef Hejzlar
Josef Hejzlar Czech Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden career prospects for those interested in Environmental Sciences. For example, earning a one year MPA develops leadership and policy-making skills crucial for environmental management roles within government and nonprofit sectors.

Similarly, a sociology bachelor degree online offers insights into societal behaviors and community dynamics, which are vital when addressing environmental justice and sustainability challenges.

For educators focusing on environmental education, pursuing an advanced degree like an online EdD can solidify their expertise. Some candidates prefer an EdD no dissertation program, which often emphasizes applied practice over research, making it ideal for busy professionals.

Additionally, for those already holding an EdS, enrolling in an EdS to EdD bridge program facilitates a streamlined path to doctoral credentials, opening doors to advanced leadership and academic roles related to environmental science education and policy.

Best Scientists Citing Maximilian Posch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles