World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
41729
World Ranking
10320
National Ranking
414

Jeff S. Healey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff S. Healey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 632 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jeff S. Healey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff S. Healey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeff S. Healey is affiliated with the Population Health Research Institute in Canada. The scientist's research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their work also extends into related subfields such as surgery, epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and internal medicine.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jeff S. Healey include:

  • William F. McIntyre
  • David Conen
  • Alexander P. Benz
  • Stuart J. Connolly
  • Emilie P. Belley-Côté

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • EP Europace
  • European Heart Journal
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Circulation

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jeff S. Healey illustrate their research focus:

  • "Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion during Cardiac Surgery to Prevent Stroke" (2021), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation" (2020), published in Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • "Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation" (2023), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation: A Study-Level Meta-Analysis of the NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESiA Trials" (2023), published in Circulation
  • "Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in the Older Population" (2021), published in JAMA Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of Stroke

    Jeff S. Healey;Stuart J. Connolly;Michael R. Gold;Carsten W. Israel

  • Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate Heart Failure

    Anthony S. L. Tang;George A. Wells;Mario Talajic;Malcolm O. Arnold

  • Risk of Bleeding With 2 Doses of Dabigatran Compared With Warfarin in Older and Younger Patients With Atrial Fibrillation An Analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) Trial

    John W. Eikelboom;Lars Wallentin;Stuart J. Connolly;Mike Ezekowitz

  • Prevention of atrial fibrillation with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers : a meta-analysis

    Jeff S. Healey;Adrian Baranchuk;Eugene Crystal;Carlos A. Morillo

  • Benefit of Oral Anticoagulant Over Antiplatelet Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Depends on the Quality of International Normalized Ratio Control Achieved by Centers and Countries as Measured by Time in Therapeutic Range

    Stuart J. Connolly;Janice Pogue;John Eikelboom;Gregory Flaker

  • Temporal Relationship Between Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation and Embolic Events

    Michela Brambatti;Stuart J. Connolly;Michael R. Gold;Carlos A. Morillo

  • Periprocedural Bleeding and Thromboembolic Events With Dabigatran Compared With Warfarin Results From the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) Randomized Trial

    Jeff S. Healey;John Eikelboom;James Douketis;Lars Wallentin

  • Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs

    John L Sapp;George A Wells;Ratika Parkash;William G Stevenson

  • Radiofrequency Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drugs as First-Line Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (RAAFT-2): A Randomized Trial

    Carlos A. Morillo;Atul Verma;Stuart J. Connolly;Karl H. Kuck

  • 2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing

    Bruce L. Wilkoff;Laurent Fauchier;Martin K. Stiles;Carlos A. Morillo

  • Pacemaker or Defibrillator Surgery without Interruption of Anticoagulation

    David H. Birnie;Jeff S. Healey;George A. Wells;Atul Verma

  • Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS): Results of a randomized controlled pilot study of left atrial appendage occlusion during coronary bypass surgery in patients at risk for stroke

    Jeff S. Healey;Eugene Crystal;Andre Lamy;Kevin Teoh

  • Focused 2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines: recommendations for stroke prevention and rate/rhythm control.

    Allan C. Skanes;Jeff S. Healey;John A. Cairns;Paul Dorian

  • Interventions for preventing post‐operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery

    Kyle A Arsenault;Arif M Yusuf;Eugene Crystal;Jeff S Healey

  • Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration

    Ben Freedman;John Camm;Hugh Calkins;Jeffrey S Healey

  • Incidence of stroke in paroxysmal versus sustained atrial fibrillation in patients taking oral anticoagulation or combined antiplatelet therapy: an ACTIVE W Substudy.

    Stefan H. Hohnloser;Dimitri Pajitnev;Janice Pogue;Jeff S. Healey

  • Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT

    Isabelle C. Van Gelder;Jeff S. Healey;Harry J. G. M. Crijns;Jia Wang

  • 2014 focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation.

    Atul Verma;John A. Cairns;L. Brent Mitchell;Laurent Macle

  • Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion during Cardiac Surgery to Prevent Stroke

    Richard P. Whitlock;Emilie P. Belley-Cote;Domenico Paparella;Jeff S. Healey

  • Variations in Cause and Management of Atrial Fibrillation in a Prospective Registry of 15 400 Emergency Department Patients in 46 Countries The RE-LY Atrial Fibrillation Registry

    Jonas Oldgren;Jeff S. Healey;Michael Ezekowitz;Patrick Commerford

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart J. Connolly
Stuart J. Connolly McMaster University
Carlos A. Morillo
Carlos A. Morillo University of Calgary
Andrew D. Krahn
Andrew D. Krahn University of British Columbia
Stefan H. Hohnloser
Stefan H. Hohnloser Goethe University Frankfurt
Paul Dorian
Paul Dorian University of Toronto
Mario Talajic
Mario Talajic Montreal Heart Institute
Salim Yusuf
Salim Yusuf McMaster University
George A. Wells
George A. Wells University of Ottawa
John W. Eikelboom
John W. Eikelboom Population Health Research Institute
Raymond Yee
Raymond Yee University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA can also lead to a range of flexible online study options. Many aspiring healthcare professionals seek accelerated programs to fast-track their entry into the field. For instance, the fast track lpn programs online are designed for those seeking a quick route to becoming licensed practical nurses, making healthcare careers more accessible.

Advanced nursing roles are also in high demand. Those interested in leadership or clinical specialization may consider the easiest dnp program online, which can help nurses achieve the highest level of clinical practice. If your interest lies in mental health, the shortest online pmhnp programs enable registered nurses to swiftly transition into psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner roles.

Not all medical careers are patient-facing. For those drawn to healthcare management, health administration degrees online offer a cost-effective way to develop key leadership and organizational skills within hospitals and clinics. These varied paths highlight the flexibility and diversity available to students pursuing medicine and healthcare careers online.

Best Scientists Citing Jeff S. Healey

Trending Scientists