World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8198 7708 312 297 730 42658

Andrew D. Krahn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew D. Krahn between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew D. Krahn published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 24.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 61 publications in 2021. 62 of the 827 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 61. Peak 61 publications in 2021. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 31 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 43 publications 2012: 45 publications 2013: 48 publications 2014: 39 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 41 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 40 publications 2020: 46 publications 2021: 61 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 37 publications 2024: 35 publications 2025: 27 publications
1992 2025

827 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew D. Krahn: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 0
1994 0
1995 5
1996 3
1997 6
1998 6
1999 8
2000 10
2001 7
2002 7
2003 18
2004 24
2005 22
2006 26
2007 18
2008 31
2009 27
2010 24
2011 43
2012 45
2013 48
2014 39
2015 31
2016 41
2017 29
2018 26
2019 40
2020 46
2021 61
2022 35
2023 37
2024 35
2025 27
Total 827
Download as CSV

Andrew D. Krahn publications per year - data summary

  • Andrew D. Krahn, a Medicine scholar from University of British Columbia, has 827 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1992 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 61 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1992, with 2 publications.
  • 2 of the 34 years in the span carry no publications at all (1993 and 1994).
  • The rate of publication averages 24.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 25.8 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 195 publications, 24% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1992-2003: 72 publications (6.0 per year); 2004-2015: 378 publications (31.5 per year); 2016-2025: 377 publications (37.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Andrew D. Krahn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. Krahn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 721–740 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 730 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259 730
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew D. Krahn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Andrew D. Krahn, a Medicine scholar from University of British Columbia, records 730 publications - the 83rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 83% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Andrew D. Krahn, and about 17% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Andrew D. Krahn ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Andrew D. Krahn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew D. Krahn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Andrew D. Krahn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Andrew D. Krahn, a Medicine scholar from University of British Columbia, records 100 D-Index - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Andrew D. Krahn, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Andrew D. Krahn ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Andrew D. Krahn is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada, with a primary focus on Medicine and an extensive publication record. Their research is concentrated mainly in the fields of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, supported by substantial work in Molecular Biology, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, and Epidemiology.

Their recent research outputs highlight significant contributions to cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias. Among these are key papers such as:

  • 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation, 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the state of genetic testing for cardiac diseases, 2022, EP Europace
  • 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families, 2020, Heart Rhythm
  • European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) Expert Consensus Statement on the State of Genetic Testing for Cardiac Diseases, 2022, Heart Rhythm
  • Transethnic Genome-Wide Association Study Provides Insights in the Genetic Architecture and Heritability of Long QT Syndrome, 2020, Circulation

Krahn's research topics include:

  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations are:

  • Zachary Laksman
  • Jason D. Roberts
  • Brianna Davies
  • Shubhayan Sanatani
  • Christian Steinberg

The venues most commonly featuring Krahn's work include:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology
  • CJC Open
  • EP Europace

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009): the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Wouter Wieling

  • HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes: document endorsed by HRS, EHRA, and APHRS in May 2013 and by ACCF, AHA, PACES, and AEPC in June 2013.

    Silvia G. Priori;Arthur A. Wilde;Minoru Horie;Yongkeun Cho

  • Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study.

    Scott D Corley;Andrew E Epstein;John P DiMarco;Michael J Domanski

  • 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction

    Fred M. Kusumoto;Mark H. Schoenfeld;Bruce L. Wilkoff;Charles I. Berul

  • 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society

    Win Kuang Shen;Robert S. Sheldon;David G. Benditt;Mitchell I. Cohen

  • 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope

    Robert S. Sheldon;Blair P. Grubb;Brian Olshansky;Win Kuang Shen

  • 2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

    Jeffrey A. Towbin;William J. McKenna;Dominic J. Abrams;Michael J. Ackerman

  • Somatic mutations in the connexin 40 gene (GJA5) in atrial fibrillation.

    Michael H Gollob;Douglas L Jones;Andrew D Krahn;Lynne Danis

  • Pacemaker or Defibrillator Surgery without Interruption of Anticoagulation

    David H. Birnie;Jeff S. Healey;George A. Wells;Atul Verma

  • Randomized Assessment of Syncope Trial Conventional Diagnostic Testing Versus a Prolonged Monitoring Strategy

    Andrew D. Krahn;George J. Klein;Raymond Yee;Allan C. Skanes

  • Pacemaker therapy in patients with neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole:Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3): a randomized trial

    Michele Brignole;Carlo Menozzi;Angel Moya;Dietrich Andresen

  • Use of an Extended Monitoring Strategy in Patients With Problematic Syncope

    Andrew D. Krahn;George J. Klein;Raymond Yee;Teri Takle-Newhouse

  • Inaccurate electrocardiographic interpretation of long QT: the majority of physicians cannot recognize a long QT when they see one.

    Sami Viskin;Uri Rosovski;Andrew J. Sands;Edmond Chen

  • Flecainide therapy reduces exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

    Christian van der Werf;Prince J. Kannankeril;Frederic Sacher;Andrew D. Krahn

  • ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope (Version 2009)

    Ángel Moya;Richard Sutton;Fabrizio Ammirati;Jean-Jacques Blanc

  • Systematic Assessment of Patients With Unexplained Cardiac Arrest Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER)

    Andrew D. Krahn;Jeffrey S. Healey;Vijay Chauhan;David H. Birnie

  • HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes

    Silvia G. Priori;Arthur A. Wilde;Minoru Horie;Yongkeun Cho

  • Prevention of Syncope Trial (POST): a randomized, placebo-controlled study of metoprolol in the prevention of vasovagal syncope.

    Robert Sheldon;Stuart Connolly;Sarah Rose;Thomas Klingenheben

  • Analysis of Cause-Specific Mortality in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study

    Jonathan S. Steinberg;Jonathan S. Steinberg;Ara Sadaniantz;Jack Kron;Andrew Krahn

  • Executive Summary: HRS/EHRA/APHRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Inherited Primary Arrhythmia Syndromes

    Silvia G. Priori;Arthur A. Wilde;Minoru Horie;Yongkeun Cho

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeff S. Healey
Jeff S. Healey Population Health Research Institute
George Klein
George Klein Karolinska Institute
Raymond Yee
Raymond Yee University of Western Ontario
Mario Talajic
Mario Talajic Montreal Heart Institute
Arthur A.M. Wilde
Arthur A.M. Wilde University of Amsterdam
Carlos A. Morillo
Carlos A. Morillo University of Calgary
Paul Dorian
Paul Dorian University of Toronto
Elijah R. Behr
Elijah R. Behr St George's, University of London
Douglas S. Lee
Douglas S. Lee University Health Network

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional pathway of medical school. There are many online degrees and fast-track programs to help you enter the healthcare field or advance your career. These options make it easier for students balancing work, family, or financial obligations.

For nurses looking to reach the highest clinical level quickly, consider enrolling in one of the shortest dnp program online options. If you want a program that combines speed with manageable coursework, check out easiest online dnp programs for accessible routes to a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

Those seeking the quickest entry into practical nursing may benefit from a 6 month lpn program to become a Licensed Practical Nurse in a short time. If mental health is your passion, specialized options like the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs can prepare you for advanced practice roles in psychiatric and mental health nursing.

These online degrees offer flexible pathways for those who want to contribute to healthcare in the USA, with options tailored to diverse goals and timelines.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew D. Krahn

Trending Scientists