World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
49118
World Ranking
5306
National Ranking
210

Paul Dorian publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Dorian sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 823 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul Dorian D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Dorian sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Dorian is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a significant focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The main subfields of their work include:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Epidemiology

The scientist's research topics cover a range of cardiac-related areas, specifically:

  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Paul Dorian has published in several frequent venues, including:

  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • CJC Open
  • Resuscitation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation

Among their recent papers are:

  • The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Defibrillation Strategies for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Gender-Based Differences in Outcomes Among Resuscitated Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, 2020, Circulation
  • Survival After Intravenous Versus Intraosseous Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Shock-Refractory Cardiac Arrest, 2020, Circulation
  • Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Associated With Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Noncardiac Surgery, 2020, Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Katherine S. Allan
  • Sheldon Cheskes
  • Steve Lin
  • Dennis T. Ko
  • Kim A. Connelly

Best Publications

  • Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone.

    Stuart J. Connolly;Michael Gent;Robin S. Roberts;Paul Dorian

  • Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure

    Denis Roy;Mario Talajic;Stanley Nattel;D. George Wyse

  • Prophylactic Use of an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Stefan H. Hohnloser;Karl Heinz Kuck;Paul Dorian;Robin S. Roberts

  • Amiodarone to Prevent Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation

    Denis Roy;Mario Talajic;Paul Dorian;Stuart Connolly

  • Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke

    David J. Gladstone;Melanie Spring;Paul Dorian;Val Panzov

  • Amiodarone as Compared with Lidocaine for Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation

    Paul Dorian;Dan Cass;Brian Schwartz;Richard Cooper

  • Effects of Citalopram and Interpersonal Psychotherapy on Depression in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: The Canadian Cardiac Randomized Evaluation of Antidepressant and Psychotherapy Efficacy (CREATE) Trial

    Nancy Frasure-Smith;Diana Koszycki;Louis T. van Zyl;Brian Baker

  • Comparison of β-Blockers, Amiodarone Plus β-Blockers, or Sotalol for Prevention of Shocks From Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: The OPTIC Study: A Randomized Trial

    Stuart J. Connolly;Paul Dorian;Robin S. Roberts;Michael Gent

  • The impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation: implications for the assessment of investigational therapy.

    Paul Dorian;Werner Jung;David Newman;Miney Paquette

  • Dronedarone in High-Risk Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

    Amany N. Elgazayerly;Pieter A. de Graeff;Hubert G. Leufkens

  • Focused 2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines: recommendations for stroke prevention and rate/rhythm control.

    Allan C. Skanes;Jeff S. Healey;John A. Cairns;Paul Dorian

  • Canadian Cardiovascular Society consensus conference recommendations on heart failure 2006: Diagnosis and management

    J. Malcolm O. Arnold;Peter Liu;Catherine Demers;Paul Dorian

  • Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after the initial diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the Canadian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation.

    Charles R. Kerr;Karin H. Humphries;Mario Talajic;George J. Klein

  • 2014 focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation.

    Atul Verma;John A. Cairns;L. Brent Mitchell;Laurent Macle

  • EHRA/HRS/APHRS expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias

    Christian Torp Pedersen;G. Neal Kay;Jonathan Kalman;Martin Borggrefe

  • Development and Validation of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) Questionnaire in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

    John Spertus;Paul Dorian;Rosemary Bubien;Steve Lewis

  • New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation : Sex Differences in Presentation, Treatment, and Outcome

    Karin H. Humphries;Charles R. Kerr;Stuart J. Connolly;George Klein

  • Quality of life in the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS)

    Jane Irvine;Paul Dorian;Brian Baker;Bernie J. O'Brien

  • The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

    Jason G. Andrade;Jason G. Andrade;Martin Aguilar;Clare Atzema;Alan Bell

  • Amiodarone as compared with lidocaine for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation☆

    P. Dorian;D. Cass;B. Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurie J. Morrison
Laurie J. Morrison University of Toronto
Stuart J. Connolly
Stuart J. Connolly McMaster University
Mario Talajic
Mario Talajic Montreal Heart Institute
Jeff S. Healey
Jeff S. Healey Population Health Research Institute
Peter C. Austin
Peter C. Austin University of Toronto
Jack V. Tu
Jack V. Tu University of Toronto
Douglas S. Lee
Douglas S. Lee University Health Network
Stefan H. Hohnloser
Stefan H. Hohnloser Goethe University Frankfurt
Andrew D. Krahn
Andrew D. Krahn University of British Columbia
Daniel B. Mark
Daniel B. Mark Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking alternative educational routes, a variety of online degrees and career pathways are available. Prospective healthcare professionals can consider direct entry msn programs, which are ideal for non-nurses aiming to fast-track their way into advanced nursing roles. These programs allow students with a background in other fields to earn a Master of Science in Nursing efficiently.

If you’re concerned about admission challenges, exploring nursing schools with high acceptance rates can open doors to a rewarding nursing career. Not all institutions require highly competitive entry exams—many applicants look for do all nursing schools require the teas to simplify their path into nursing programs.

Additionally, the healthcare industry offers vital support roles such as medical billing and coding. Individuals interested in this area can find accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid, making it easier to break into healthcare without a clinical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Dorian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles