World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 118 4040 155 659 55192

Jack V. Tu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jack V. Tu between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jack V. Tu published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 20.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 60 publications in 2018. 19 of the 678 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 60. Peak 60 publications in 2018. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 28 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 33 publications 2009: 30 publications 2010: 39 publications 2011: 35 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 42 publications 2014: 37 publications 2015: 35 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 49 publications 2018: 60 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 17 publications
1993 2025

678 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jack V. Tu: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 0
1995 2
1996 2
1997 6
1998 5
1999 5
2000 10
2001 20
2002 12
2003 28
2004 22
2005 27
2006 26
2007 26
2008 33
2009 30
2010 39
2011 35
2012 38
2013 42
2014 37
2015 35
2016 39
2017 49
2018 60
2019 19
2020 6
2021 1
2022 3
2023 0
2024 2
2025 17
Total 678
Download as CSV

Jack V. Tu publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack V. Tu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 641–660 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 659 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371 659
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jack V. Tu D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack V. Tu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302 118
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jack V. Tu was affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly focusing on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research extended into public health, environmental and occupational health, surgery, and general health professions.

Their scientific output included work on several core topics:

  • Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Tu published research in multiple peer-reviewed venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • CJC Open
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • PubMed
  • American Heart Journal
  • BMJ Open

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Tu included:

  • "International population-based health surveys linked to outcome data: A new resource for public health and epidemiology" (2020, PubMed)
  • "Awareness of Warning Symptoms of Heart Disease and Stroke: Results of a Follow-up Study of the Chinese Canadian Cardiovascular Health Project" (2021, CJC Open)
  • "The associations between direct and delayed critical care unit admission with mortality and readmissions among patients with heart failure" (2020, American Heart Journal)
  • "The Canadian Alliance for Healthy Hearts and Minds: How Well Does It Reflect the Canadian Population?" (2020, CJC Open)
  • "Sex-specific temporal trends in ambulatory heart failure incidence, mortality and hospitalisation in Ontario, Canada from 1994 to 2013: a population-based cohort study" (2020, BMJ Open)

Throughout their career, Tu frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • Douglas S. Lee
  • Matthias G. Friedrich
  • Jean-Claude Tardif
  • Sonia S. Anand
  • Peter C. Austin

Best Publications

  • Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study.

    R. Sacha Bhatia;Jack V. Tu;Jack V. Tu;Douglas S. Lee;Peter C. Austin

  • Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Artificial Neural Networks versus Logistic Regression for Predicting Medical Outcomes

    Jack V. Tu

  • Predicting mortality among patients hospitalized for heart failure. Derivation and validation of a clinical model

    D.S. Lee;P.C. Austin;J.L. Rouleau;P.P. Liu

  • Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes

    C.A. Jackevicius;M. Mamdani;J.V. Tu

  • A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel

    David N. Juurlink;Tara Gomes;Dennis T. Ko;Dennis T. Ko;Paul E. Szmitko

  • Relation between age and cardiovascular disease in men and women with diabetes compared with non-diabetic people: a population-based retrospective cohort study

    Gillian L Booth;Gillian L Booth;Gillian L Booth;Moira K Kapral;Kinwah Fung;Jack V Tu;Jack V Tu;Jack V Tu

  • Relation of Disease Pathogenesis and Risk Factors to Heart Failure With Preserved or Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From the Framingham Heart Study of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

    Douglas S. Lee;Philimon Gona;Philimon Gona;Ramachandran S. Vasan;Ramachandran S. Vasan;Martin G. Larson;Martin G. Larson

  • Effects of socioeconomic status on access to invasive cardiac procedures and on mortality after acute myocardial infarction.

    D A Alter;C D Naylor;P Austin;J V Tu

  • Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal Stents Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies

    Ajay J. Kirtane;Anuj Gupta;Srinivas Iyengar;Jeffrey W. Moses

  • A multicenter study of the coding accuracy of hospital discharge administrative data for patients admitted to cardiac care units in Ontario.

    Peter C. Austin;Paul A. Daly;Jack V. Tu

  • Bootstrap Methods for Developing Predictive Models

    Peter C Austin;Jack V Tu

  • The high risk of stroke immediately after transient ischemic attack: a population-based study.

    M. D. Hill;N. Yiannakoulias;T. Jeerakathil;J. V. Tu

  • Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Steering Committee of the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario.

    J V Tu;S B Jaglal;C D Naylor

  • Impact of hospital nursing care on 30‐day mortality for acute medical patients

    Ann E. Tourangeau;Diane M. Doran;Linda McGillis Hall;Linda O'Brien Pallas

  • Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Primary Nonadherence After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Cynthia A. Jackevicius;Ping Li;Jack V. Tu

  • Potentially Preventable Strokes in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Not Adequately Anticoagulated

    David J. Gladstone;Esther Bui;Jiming Fang;Andreas Laupacis

  • Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry

    Suzanne M. Cadarette;Susan B. Jaglal;Nancy Kreiger;Warren J. McIsaac

  • Prognosis and determinants of survival in patients newly hospitalized for heart failure. A population-based study

    P. Jong;E. Vowinckel;P.P. Liu;Y. Gong

  • Effectiveness and Safety of Drug-Eluting Stents in Ontario

    Jack V Tu;James Bowen;Maria Chiu;Dennis T Ko

  • Impracticability of Informed Consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network

    Jack V. Tu;Donald J. Willison;Frank L. Silver;Jiming Fang

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter C. Austin
Peter C. Austin University of Toronto
Douglas S. Lee
Douglas S. Lee University Health Network
Muhammad Mamdani
Muhammad Mamdani University of Toronto
Therese A. Stukel
Therese A. Stukel University of Toronto
Louise Pilote
Louise Pilote McGill University
Stephen E. Fremes
Stephen E. Fremes University of Toronto
Paul Dorian
Paul Dorian University of Toronto
Gustavo Saposnik
Gustavo Saposnik University of Toronto
Mark J. Eisenberg
Mark J. Eisenberg McGill University
Harlan M. Krumholz
Harlan M. Krumholz Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to a range of online degrees that support diverse healthcare careers. Many students are now considering flexible online options to gain the skills and credentials needed for roles in healthcare leadership, pharmacy, nursing, and information management.

For those interested in administration, pursuing the cheapest online mha programs can prepare you for management positions in hospitals and health organizations without breaking the bank. If nursing is your calling, you can advance your practice and leadership skills by enrolling in one of the cheapest dnp degrees available online.

Aspiring pharmacists can compare pharmacy school online accredited programs, ensuring a quality education while balancing other commitments. For those drawn to data and technology, accredited rhit programs online provide pathways into crucial health information management careers.

Selecting the right online program can offer affordability, flexibility, and accredited training to fuel your future in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Jack V. Tu

Recently Published Articles