World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark J. Eisenberg

Mark J. Eisenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 14877 14001 617 588 457 35169

Mark J. Eisenberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark J. Eisenberg between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark J. Eisenberg published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 13.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2013. 13 of the 504 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2013. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 29 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

504 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark J. Eisenberg: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 3
1992 7
1993 4
1994 3
1995 11
1996 15
1997 3
1998 2
1999 3
2000 2
2001 7
2002 13
2003 18
2004 16
2005 13
2006 18
2007 20
2008 18
2009 12
2010 28
2011 29
2012 30
2013 38
2014 21
2015 20
2016 26
2017 12
2018 19
2019 3
2020 12
2021 15
2022 12
2023 15
2024 22
2025 12
2026 1
Total 504
Download as CSV

Mark J. Eisenberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Eisenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 457 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 457
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark J. Eisenberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Eisenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark J. Eisenberg is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and has an extensive record of research primarily within the field of medicine. Their research contributions span several subfields, including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, public health, physiology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.

Their work addresses a range of important topics such as smoking behavior and cessation, cannabis and cannabinoid research, opioid use disorder treatment, obesity and related lifestyle factors, acute myocardial infarction research, coronary interventions and diagnostics, and pharmacology related to obesity treatment.

Recent notable papers authored or coauthored by Mark J. Eisenberg include:

  • Effect of e-Cigarettes Plus Counseling vs Counseling Alone on Smoking Cessation, 2020, JAMA
  • Radiation-Induced Cardiovascular Disease: Review of an Underrecognized Pathology, 2021, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • The Effect of Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews, 2021, American Journal of Public Health
  • Association of Elevated Amyloid and Tau Positron Emission Tomography Signal With Near-Term Development of Alzheimer Disease Symptoms in Older Adults Without Cognitive Impairment, 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • Epidemiological and clinical perspectives of long COVID syndrome, 2023, American Journal of Medicine Open

Their frequent coauthors include Kristian B. Filion, Sarah B. Windle, Jeremy Y. Levett, Pascal Reynier, and Geneviève Gore.

Mark J. Eisenberg's publications are often found in journals such as:

  • CJC Open
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Their body of work incorporates research on diverse medical and public health issues, often related to cardiovascular health and disease prevention. The range of topics in their studies reflects interdisciplinary interests crossing both clinical and population health perspectives.

Best Publications

  • The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Salvatore Mottillo;Kristian B. Filion;Jacques Genest;Lawrence Joseph

  • Amiodarone to Prevent Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation

    Denis Roy;Mario Talajic;Paul Dorian;Stuart Connolly

  • ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography)

    Philip Greenland;Robert O. Bonow;Bruce H. Brundage;Matthew J. Budoff

  • ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain

    Philip Greenland;Robert O. Bonow;Bruce H. Brundage;Matthew J. Budoff

  • ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents

    W. Gregory Hundley;David A. Bluemke;J. Paul Finn;Scott D. Flamm

  • A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials of drug-eluting stents.

    Mohan N Babapulle;Lawrence Joseph;Patrick Bélisle;James M Brophy

  • ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 Expert Consensus Document on Reducing the Gastrointestinal Risks of Antiplatelet Therapy and NSAID Use: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents

    Deepak L. Bhatt;James Scheiman;Neena S. Abraham;Elliott M. Antman

  • Gait speed as an incremental predictor of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

    Jonathan Afilalo;Mark J. Eisenberg;Jean François Morin;Howard Bergman;Howard Bergman

  • Role of frailty in patients with cardiovascular disease.

    Jonathan Afilalo;Sathya Karunananthan;Mark J. Eisenberg;Karen P. Alexander

  • ACCF 2012 expert consensus document on practical clinical considerations in the interpretation of troponin elevations: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation task force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

    L. Kristin Newby;Robert L. Jesse;Joseph D. Babb;Robert H. Christenson

  • Statins for Secondary Prevention in Elderly Patients: A Hierarchical Bayesian Meta-Analysis

    Jonathan Afilalo;Gustavo Duque;Russell Steele;J. Wouter Jukema

  • Addition of Frailty and Disability to Cardiac Surgery Risk Scores Identifies Elderly Patients at High Risk of Mortality or Major Morbidity

    Jonathan Afilalo;Salvatore Mottillo;Mark J. Eisenberg;Karen Patton Alexander

  • Pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Mark J. Eisenberg;Kristian B. Filion;Daniel Yavin;Patrick Bélisle

  • ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting).

    Eric R. Bates;Joseph D. Babb;Donald E. Casey;Christopher U. Cates

  • Effectiveness of renal denervation therapy for resistant hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Mark I. Davis;Kristian B. Filion;David Zhang;Mark J. Eisenberg

  • Warfarin Use and the Risk for Stroke and Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Dialysis

    Mitesh Shah;Meytal Avgil Tsadok;Cynthia A. Jackevicius;Vidal Essebag

  • Isolated Aerobic Exercise and Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Adrian Thorogood;Salvatore Mottillo;Salvatore Mottillo;Salvatore Mottillo;Avi Shimony;Avi Shimony;Kristian B. Filion

  • Coated stents for the prevention of restenosis: Part II.

    Mohan N. Babapulle;Mark J. Eisenberg

  • Safety of Short-Term Discontinuation of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Drug-Eluting Stents

    Mark J. Eisenberg;Pierre R. Richard;Danielle Libersan;Kristian B. Filion

  • Sex Versus Gender-Related Characteristics: Which Predicts Outcome After Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Young?

    Roxanne Pelletier;Nadia A. Khan;Jafna Cox;Stella S. Daskalopoulou

Frequent Co-Authors

Louise Pilote
Louise Pilote McGill University
Lawrence Joseph
Lawrence Joseph McGill University
Nelson B. Schiller
Nelson B. Schiller University of California, San Francisco
Jack V. Tu
Jack V. Tu University of Toronto
Jennifer O'Loughlin
Jennifer O'Loughlin University of Montreal
Jean-Claude Tardif
Jean-Claude Tardif Montreal Heart Institute
Mark A. Hlatky
Mark A. Hlatky Stanford University
James H. Stein
James H. Stein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert A. Harrington
Robert A. Harrington Cornell University
Eric R. Bates
Eric R. Bates University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine offers a variety of related online degrees and professional routes. For those interested in the business and management side of healthcare, pursuing a healthcare administration degree online provides flexible study options. This degree can open doors to leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

If you are seeking to deepen your administrative expertise while minimizing costs, the cheapest online master degree in healthcare administration offers an affordable way to enhance your credentials and advance your career trajectory.

Aspiring nurse leaders may consider the best dnp programs online. A Doctor of Nursing Practice enables professionals to transform patient care and move into advanced practice or management positions—all with the flexibility of online study.

Future pharmacists can benefit from accredited online pharmacy programs, which make it easier to balance education with other life commitments while preparing for rewarding roles in pharmaceutical care or research.

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Eisenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles