World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 34 12142 11790 162 162 75 5167

Filip Biljecki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Filip Biljecki between 2010 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Filip Biljecki published across 17 years, from 2010 to 2026, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2025. 48 of the 230 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2025. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 37 publications 2025: 47 publications 2026: 1 publication
2010 2026

230 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Filip Biljecki: publications per year, 2010 to 2026
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
2013 5
2014 4
2015 10
2016 12
2017 9
2018 6
2019 9
2020 12
2021 13
2022 34
2023 30
2024 37
2025 47
2026 1
Total 230
Download as CSV

Filip Biljecki publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filip Biljecki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 72–81 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 75 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249 75
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Filip Biljecki D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Filip Biljecki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 34
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Filip Biljecki is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore and has a research focus primarily in Engineering and Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, including Building and Construction, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Transportation, and Geography, Planning and Development.

Their research topics cover a wide array of areas such as 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Geographic Information Systems Studies, Impact of Light on Environment and Health, Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis, Urban Green Space and Health, and Geological Modeling and Analysis.

Among recent scholarly contributions, the following papers are notable:

  • Street view imagery in urban analytics and GIS: A review, 2021, Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Unsupervised machine learning in urban studies: A systematic review of applications, 2022, Cities
  • Challenges of urban digital twins: A systematic review and a Delphi expert survey, 2023, Automation in Construction
  • Classification of urban morphology with deep learning: Application on urban vitality, 2021, Computers Environment and Urban Systems
  • A review of spatially-explicit GeoAI applications in Urban Geography, 2022, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Their collaborations include extensive coauthorship with several researchers, notably Jantien Stoter, Ken Arroyo Ohori, Francesca Noardo, Lars Harrie, and Claire Ellul, each with multiple joint publications.

Filip Biljecki frequently publishes in a variety of scientific venues, with notable contributions in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Cities, arXiv (Cornell University), Computers Environment and Urban Systems, and the ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Applications of 3D City Models: State of the Art Review

    Filip Biljecki;Jantien E. Stoter;Hugo Ledoux;Sisi Zlatanova

  • Street view imagery in urban analytics and GIS: A review

    Filip Biljecki;Koichi Ito

  • An improved LOD specification for 3D building models

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • Formalisation of the level of detail in 3D city modelling

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter;Junqiao Zhao;Junqiao Zhao

  • Transportation mode-based segmentation and classification of movement trajectories

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Peter van Oosterom

  • Generating 3D city models without elevation data

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • Assessing bikeability with street view imagery and computer vision

    Koichi Ito;Filip Biljecki

  • CityGML Application Domain Extension (ADE): overview of developments

    Filip Biljecki;Kavisha Kumar;Claus Nagel

  • 3D city models for urban farming site identification in buildings

    Ankit Palliwal;Shuang Song;Hugh Tiang Wah Tan;Filip Biljecki

  • The variants of an LOD of a 3D building model and their influence on spatial analyses

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien Stoter;George Vosselman

  • Propagation of positional error in 3D GIS: estimation of the solar irradiation of building roofs

    Filip Biljecki;Gerard B. M. Heuvelink;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien Stoter

  • Extending CityGML for IFC-sourced 3D city models

    Filip Biljecki;Joie Lim;James Crawford;Diana Moraru

  • Automatically enhancing CityGML LOD2 models with a corresponding indoor geometry

    Roeland Boeters;Ken Arroyo Ohori;Filip Biljecki;Sisi Zlatanova

  • Roofpedia: Automatic mapping of green and solar roofs for an open roofscape registry and evaluation of urban sustainability

    Abraham Noah Wu;Filip Biljecki

  • Achieving Complete and Near-Lossless Conversion from IFC to CityGML

    Rudi Stouffs;Helga Tauscher;Filip Biljecki

  • GENERATION OF MULTI-LOD 3D CITY MODELS IN CITYGML WITH THE PROCEDURAL MODELLING ENGINE RANDOM3DCITY

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien Stoter

  • Tools for BIM-GIS Integration (IFC Georeferencing and Conversions): Results from the GeoBIM Benchmark 2019

    Francesca Noardo;Lars Harrie;Ken Arroyo Ohori;Filip Biljecki

  • Registration of multi-level property rights in 3D in the Netherlands: Two cases and next steps in further implementation

    Jantien E. Stoter;Hendrik Ploeger;Ruben Roes;Els van der Riet

  • Proposal for a new LOD and multi-representation concept for CityGML

    Marc-O Löwner;Gerhard Gröger;Joachim Benner;Filip Biljecki

  • Towards an integration of GIS and BIM data: What are the geometric and topological issues?

    G.A.K. Arroyo Ohori;F. Biljecki;A.A. Diakite;Thomas Krijnen

  • The most common geometric and semantic errors in CityGML datasets

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Xin Du;Jantien Stoter

Frequent Co-Authors

Jantien Stoter
Jantien Stoter Delft University of Technology
Hugo Ledoux
Hugo Ledoux Delft University of Technology
Ramon F. Hanssen
Ramon F. Hanssen Delft University of Technology
Sisi Zlatanova
Sisi Zlatanova University of New South Wales
Felix Creutzig
Felix Creutzig Technical University of Berlin
George Vosselman
George Vosselman University of Twente
Peter van Oosterom
Peter van Oosterom Delft University of Technology
Mingsheng Liao
Mingsheng Liao Wuhan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students are interested in flexible learning opportunities, and online degrees make it possible to balance education with work or family commitments.

If you're seeking a fast-tracked education, consider an accelerated cs degree. These programs can help you earn your credentials quickly, enabling you to enter the workforce sooner or pursue advanced studies without delay.

For those interested in interdisciplinary fields, combining technology with other subjects can expand your career options. For instance, there are diverse jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree backgrounds that can benefit from computer science skills, especially in today’s data-driven world.

Cost of education is also a major consideration. You can look into the cheapest online environmental science degree or learn more about the mechanical engineering cost of education to find affordable ways to advance your studies.

Whether you want to accelerate your timeline, reduce costs, or combine computer science with other disciplines, there are numerous online programs and career pathways worth exploring.

Best Scientists Citing Filip Biljecki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles