World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5928
World Ranking
11205
National Ranking
203

Peter van Oosterom publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter van Oosterom sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 193 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter van Oosterom D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter van Oosterom sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter van Oosterom is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, where their academic work spans engineering and earth and planetary sciences. Their research primarily focuses on building and construction, geology, geography, planning and development, environmental engineering, and geochemistry and petrology.

Their research topics cover several areas central to geospatial and geological sciences, including:

  • 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Geological Modeling and Analysis
  • Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
  • Data Management and Algorithms

Peter van Oosterom has a significant number of publications. Among their recent papers are:

  • Indoor navigation supported by the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC): A survey, 2020, published in Automation in Construction
  • 3D Land Administration: A Review and a Future Vision in the Context of the Spatial Development Lifecycle, 2020, published in ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • 3 Dimensional data research for property valuation in the context of the LADM Valuation Information Model, 2020, published in Land Use Policy
  • Methodology for the development of LADM country profiles, 2021, published in Land Use Policy
  • Implementation of the spatial plan information package for improving ease of doing business in Indonesian cities, 2021, published in Land Use Policy

The scientist frequently collaborates with several colleagues. Notable co-authors include:

  • C. Lemmen
  • Eftychia Kalogianni
  • Martijn Meijers
  • E. Verbree
  • Abdullah Kara

Their work is mostly published in journals and conference proceedings such as:

  • Land Use Policy
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology)
  • The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
  • ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
  • AGILE GIScience Series

Best Publications

  • A Small Set of Formal Topological Relationships Suitable for End-User Interaction

    Eliseo Clementini;Paolino Di Felice;Peter van Oosterom

  • 3D Cadastre in an International Context : Legal, Organizational, and Technological Aspects

    Jantien E. Stoter;Peter van Oosterom

  • Reactive Data Structures for Geographic Information Systems

    Peter van Oosterom

  • Transportation mode-based segmentation and classification of movement trajectories

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Peter van Oosterom

  • The core cadastral domain model

    Peter van Oosterom;Christiaan Lemmen;Tryggvi Ingvarsson;Paul van der Molen

  • Modelling 3D spatial objects in a geo-DBMS using a 3D primitive

    Clin Arens;Jantien Stoter;Peter van Oosterom

  • Ontology-Based Geographic Data Set Integration

    Harry Uitermark;Peter van Oosterom;Nicolaas J. I. Mars;Martien Molenaar

  • The development of an interactive multi-scale GIS

    Peter Van Oosterom;Vincent Schenkelaars

  • Research and development in 3D cadastres

    Peter van Oosterom

  • Variable-scale Topological Data Structures Suitable for Progressive Data Transfer: The GAP- face Tree and GAP-edge Forest

    Peter van Oosterom

  • 5D data modelling: full integration of 2D/3D space, time and scale dimensions

    Peter van Oosterom;Jantien Stoter

  • The Balance Between Geometry and Topology

    Peter van Oosterom;Jantien Stoter;Wilko Quak;Sisi Zlatanova

  • Massive point cloud data management

    Peter van Oosterom;Oscar Martinez-Rubi;Milena Ivanova;Mike Horhammer

  • 4D cadastres: First analysis of legal, organizational, and technical impact—With a case study on utility networks

    Fatih Döner;Rod Thompson;Rod Thompson;Jantien Stoter;Christiaan Lemmen

  • Data Model for the Collaboration between Land Administration Systems and Agricultural Land Parcel Identification Systems

    Halil Ibrahim Inan;Valentina Sagris;Wim Devos;Pavel Milenov

  • 3D cadastre in the Netherlands: Developments and international applicability

    Jantien E. Stoter;Hendrik Ploeger;Peter van Oosterom

  • Integrating Semantic and Syntactic Descriptions to Chain Geographic Services

    Unknown

  • The GAP-tree, an approach to ‘on-the-fly’ map generalization of an area partitioning

    Unknown

  • Solutions for 4D cadastre-with a case study on utility networks

    Fatih Doner;Rod Thompson;Jantien Stoter;Christiaan Lemmen

  • The Land Administration Domain Model (LADM): Motivation, standardisation, application and further development

    Peter J. M. Van Oosterom;Christiaan Lemmen

  • Indoor navigation supported by the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC): A survey

    Liu Liu;Bofeng Li;Sisi Zlatanova;Peter van Oosterom

  • Working with Open BIM Standards to Source Legal Spaces for a 3D Cadastre

    Jennifer Oldfield;Peter van Oosterom;J Jakob Beetz;TF Thomas Krijnen

  • Supporting Indoor Navigation Using Access Rights to Spaces Based on Combined Use of IndoorGML and LADM Models

    Abdullah Alattas;Sisi Zlatanova;Peter Van Oosterom;Efstathia Chatzinikolaou

  • Advances in 3D Geoinformation Systems

    Peter van Oosterom;Sisi Zlatanova;Friso Penninga;Elfriede Fendel

Frequent Co-Authors

Jantien Stoter
Jantien Stoter Delft University of Technology
Sisi Zlatanova
Sisi Zlatanova University of New South Wales
Monika Sester
Monika Sester University of Hannover
Frank van Harmelen
Frank van Harmelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Hugo Ledoux
Hugo Ledoux Delft University of Technology
Martin L. Kersten
Martin L. Kersten Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Menno-Jan Kraak
Menno-Jan Kraak University of Twente
Dennis M. Akos
Dennis M. Akos University of Colorado Boulder
Bin Yong
Bin Yong Hohai University
Ramon F. Hanssen
Ramon F. Hanssen Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Computer Science in the USA, you may also want to explore related online degrees that can open diverse career pathways. Fields like mechanical engineering, physics, data science, and electrical engineering share foundational skills and have growing demand in the job market.

For those considering engineering, learning about mechanical engineering degree cost can help you make an informed, budget-friendly choice. Physics is another solid option; a physics degree online offers strong analytical and problem-solving foundations suitable for various STEM careers.

Data Science is surging in popularity due to high salary prospects and broad applications. If affordability is a concern, explore what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to find the best value options.

Electrical engineers are in demand in cutting-edge industries, and you can earn an online master’s in electrical engineering degree to enhance your expertise or pivot your career. These degree paths complement computer science and provide versatile, well-paying opportunities in today’s tech-driven world.

Best Scientists Citing Peter van Oosterom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles