World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
45176
World Ranking
7281
National Ranking
214

T. John Martin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. John Martin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 550 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

T. John Martin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. John Martin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

T. John Martin is affiliated with the St Vincents Institute of Medical Research in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a notable focus on oncology, hematology, molecular biology, genetics, and pathology and forensic medicine as subfields.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including:

  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Bone health and treatments
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors

Frequent collaborators in their research include Philippe Moreau, Meletios Α. Dimopoulos, Natalie A. Sims, Lida Pacaud, and Joseph Mıkhael.

Among venues where T. John Martin has published most often are Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Endocrine Reviews, and Frontiers in Psychology.

Representative publications authored by T. John Martin include:

  • "Physiological and Pharmacological Roles of PTH and PTHrP in Bone Using Their Shared Receptor, PTH1R," 2021, Endocrine Reviews
  • "PTH1R Actions on Bone Using the cAMP/Protein Kinase A Pathway," 2022, Frontiers in Endocrinology

Other notable papers relevant to the broader research context (though not authored by Martin) include:

  • "Inclusion of Clinicians in the Development and Evaluation of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Tools: A Systematic Literature Review," 2022, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Cortical bone maturation in mice requires SOCS3 suppression of gp130/STAT3 signalling in osteocytes," 2020, eLife
  • "Salvage therapies including retreatment with BCMA-directed approaches after BCMA CAR-T relapses for multiple myeloma," 2024, Blood Advances

T. John Martin has been recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians, an affiliation indicating professional acknowledgment.

Best Publications

  • Therapeutic approaches to bone diseases.

    Gideon A. Rodan;T. John Martin

  • IL-17 in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis is a potent stimulator of osteoclastogenesis

    Shigeru Kotake;Nobuyuki Udagawa;Naoyuki Takahashi;Kenichiro Matsuzaki

  • Tumor Necrosis Factor α Stimulates Osteoclast Differentiation by a Mechanism Independent of the Odf/Rankl–Rank Interaction

    Kanichiro Kobayashi;Naoyuki Takahashi;Eijiro Jimi;Nobuyuki Udagawa

  • Modulation of Osteoclast Differentiation

    T Suda;N Takahashi;T J Martin

  • Origin of osteoclasts: mature monocytes and macrophages are capable of differentiating into osteoclasts under a suitable microenvironment prepared by bone marrow-derived stromal cells.

    N Udagawa;N Takahashi;T Akatsu;H Tanaka

  • Estrogen Prevents Bone Loss via Estrogen Receptor α and Induction of Fas Ligand in Osteoclasts

    Takashi Nakamura;Yuuki Imai;Yuuki Imai;Takahiro Matsumoto;Shingo Sato

  • Coupling the activities of bone formation and resorption: a multitude of signals within the basic multicellular unit

    Natalie A Sims;T John Martin

  • Control of mammary stem cell function by steroid hormone signalling

    Marie Liesse Asselin-Labat;François Vaillant;Julie M. Sheridan;Bhupinder Pal

  • Osteoclast-derived activity in the coupling of bone formation to resorption

    T. John Martin;Natalie A. Sims

  • Breast cancer cells interact with osteoblasts to support osteoclast formation.

    R J Thomas;T A Guise;J J Yin;J Elliott

  • Bisphosphonates act on rat bone resorption through the mediation of osteoblasts.

    M Sahni;H L Guenther;H Fleisch;P Collin

  • Involvement of receptor activator of NFκB ligand and tumor necrosis factor-α in bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis

    E Romas;M.T Gillespie;T.J Martin

  • The bone marrow-derived stromal cell lines MC3T3-G2/PA6 and ST2 support osteoclast-like cell differentiation in cocultures with mouse spleen cells.

    Nobuyuki Udagawa;Naoyuki Takahashi;Takuhiko Akatsu;Takahisa Sasaki

  • Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling between osteoblast-lineage cells and osteoclast precursors enhances osteoclastogenesis

    Kazuhiro Maeda;Yasuhiro Kobayashi;Nobuyuki Udagawa;Shunsuke Uehara

  • Osteoprotegerin produced by osteoblasts is an important regulator in osteoclast development and function.

    Nobuyuki Udagawa;Naoyuki Takahashi;Hisataka Yasuda;Atsuko Mizuno

  • A combination of osteoclast differentiation factor and macrophage-colony stimulating factor is sufficient for both human and mouse osteoclast formation in vitro.

    Julian M. W. Quinn;Jan Elliott;Matthew T. Gillespie;T. John Martin

  • Osteoblasts/stromal cells stimulate osteoclast activation through expression of osteoclast differentiation factor/RANKL but not macrophage colony-stimulating factor

    N. Udagawa;N. Takahashi;Eijiro Jimi;K. Matsuzaki

  • Interleukin (IL)-6 induction of osteoclast differentiation depends on IL-6 receptors expressed on osteoblastic cells but not on osteoclast progenitors.

    N Udagawa;N Takahashi;T Katagiri;T Tamura

  • Genetic ablation of parathyroid glands reveals another source of parathyroid hormone.

    Thomas Günther;Zhou Feng Chen;Jaesang Kim;Matthias Priemel

  • Bone metastasis: the importance of the neighbourhood

    Peter I Croucher;Peter I Croucher;Michelle M McDonald;Michelle M McDonald;T John Martin;T John Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Natalie A. Sims
Natalie A. Sims St Vincents Institute of Medical Research
Matthew T. Gillespie
Matthew T. Gillespie Monash University
Carl R. Walkley
Carl R. Walkley Hudson Institute of Medical Research
Gordon K. Smyth
Gordon K. Smyth Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Nobuyuki Udagawa
Nobuyuki Udagawa Matsumoto Dental University
Naoyuki Takahashi
Naoyuki Takahashi Matsumoto Dental University
Tatsuo Suda
Tatsuo Suda Saitama Medical University
David M. Findlay
David M. Findlay University of Adelaide
Ego Seeman
Ego Seeman University of Melbourne
Eleanor J. Mackie
Eleanor J. Mackie University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to a wide range of healthcare careers, some of which can be pursued through flexible online education. For example, aspiring nurses who want to fast-track their entry into the field might consider an lpn school without teas test, providing an accessible path for those who want to avoid entrance exams.

If you are interested in healthcare management rather than direct patient care, online healthcare administration degree programs offer specialized training in leadership, policy, and organization. These degrees can lead to rewarding roles in hospital or clinic administration.

For registered nurses seeking advanced practice roles, bridge programs like an asn to np pathway enable progression from an Associate Degree in Nursing to becoming a Nurse Practitioner. This allows for higher responsibility and increased earning potential.

There’s also a growing demand for professionals knowledgeable about diet and wellness. Earning a nutrition bachelor degree online equips graduates to become nutritionists, wellness coaches, or diet advisors—all crucial positions supporting patient outcomes alongside medical practitioners.

Best Scientists Citing T. John Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles