World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
3986
World Ranking
9467
National Ranking
700

Berthold Hedwig publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Berthold Hedwig sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 105 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Berthold Hedwig D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Berthold Hedwig sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Berthold Hedwig is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and focuses research largely within Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Neuroscience. Their work primarily addresses subfields such as Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Biology, Genetics, and Global and Planetary Change.

The researcher's main topics include Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research, Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior, Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy, Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, and Hemiptera Insect Studies.

Frequent publication venues for Berthold Hedwig include the Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Journal of Insect Physiology, Journal of Neurophysiology, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Journal of Experimental Biology.

Recent papers authored by Berthold Hedwig illustrate a focus on cricket behavior and neurobiology:

  • Wing movements underlying sound production in calling, rivalry, and courtship songs of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (2021), published in Journal of Insect Physiology
  • Lesions of abdominal connectives reveal a conserved organization of the calling song central pattern generator (CPG) network in different cricket species (2021), published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A
  • Modular timer networks: abdominal interneurons controlling the chirp and pulse pattern in a cricket calling song (2020), published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A
  • Does the choosiness of female crickets change as they age? (2021), published in Journal of Experimental Biology
  • Phonotaxis of male field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus, to conspecific calling song (2023), published in Animal Behaviour

Key coauthors who have collaborated frequently with Berthold Hedwig include Chu-Cheng Lin, Stephen M. Rogers, Konstantinos Kostarakos, Adam M. Bent, and Xinyang Zhang.

Best Publications

  • New insights into corollary discharges mediated by identified neural pathways.

    James F.A. Poulet;Berthold Hedwig

  • The Cellular Basis of a Corollary Discharge

    James F. A. Poulet;Berthold Hedwig;Berthold Hedwig

  • A corollary discharge maintains auditory sensitivity during sound production

    James F. A. Poulet;Berthold Hedwig

  • Imaging fictive locomotor patterns in larval Drosophila

    Stefan R. Pulver;Stefan R. Pulver;Timothy G. Bayley;Adam L. Taylor;Jimena Berni

  • Tonic signaling from O2 sensors sets neural circuit activity and behavioral state

    Karl Emanuel Busch;Patrick Laurent;Zoltan Soltesz;Robin Joseph Murphy

  • An auditory feature detection circuit for sound pattern recognition

    Stefan Schöneich;Konstantinos Kostarakos;Berthold Hedwig

  • Pulses, patterns and paths: neurobiology of acoustic behaviour in crickets

    Berthold Hedwig

  • Complex auditory behaviour emerges from simple reactive steering

    Berthold Hedwig;James F. A. Poulet

  • Control of Cricket Stridulation by a Command Neuron: Efficacy Depends on the Behavioral State

    Berthold Hedwig

  • On the role in stridulation of plurisegmental interneurons of the acridid grasshopperOmocestus viridulus L.

    B. Hedwig

  • Calling song recognition in female crickets: temporal tuning of identified brain neurons matches behavior.

    Konstantinos Kostarakos;Berthold Hedwig

  • Mechanisms underlying phonotactic steering in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus revealed with a fast trackball system

    B. Hedwig;J. F. A. Poulet

  • Substrate-Borne Vibratory Communication during Courtship in Drosophila melanogaster

    Caroline C.G. Fabre;Berthold Hedwig;Graham Conduit;Peter A. Lawrence

  • Insect Hearing and Acoustic Communication

    Berthold Hedwig

  • Auditory orientation in crickets: Pattern recognition controls reactive steering

    James F. A. Poulet;Berthold Hedwig

  • NEUROLAB, a comprehensive program for the analysis of neurophysiological and behavioural data.

    B. Hedwig;M. Knepper

  • Processing of species-specific auditory patterns in the cricket brain by ascending, local, and descending neurons during standing and walking

    Maja Zorović;Berthold Hedwig

  • Evolution of a Communication System by Sensory Exploitation of Startle Behavior

    Hannah M. ter Hofstede;Stefan Schöneich;Stefan Schöneich;Tony Robillard;Berthold Hedwig

  • Contralateral inhibition as a sensory bias: the neural basis for a female preference in a synchronously calling bushcricket, Mecopoda elongata.

    Heiner Römer;Berthold Hedwig;Swidbert R. Ott

  • Patterns of synaptic input to identified flight motoneurons in the locust

    B. Hedwig;K. G. Pearson

Frequent Co-Authors

James F.A. Poulet
James F.A. Poulet Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine
Manfred Kössl
Manfred Kössl Goethe University Frankfurt
Keir G. Pearson
Keir G. Pearson University of Alberta
Barbara Webb
Barbara Webb University of Edinburgh
Christian Rutz
Christian Rutz University of St Andrews
Peter A. Lawrence
Peter A. Lawrence University of Cambridge
Michael Bate
Michael Bate University of Cambridge
Tony Robillard
Tony Robillard French National Museum of Natural History

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options provides flexibility for students interested in neuroscience and related fields. Many aspiring professionals choose to begin with an accredited online psychology degree, which offers a solid foundation in human behavior and cognitive processes. This pathway can lead to roles in research, clinical settings, or mental health services.

For those considering graduate study, pursuing an online psychology masters allows for deeper specialization while accommodating work or family commitments. Students focused on therapeutic practices might look into the cheapest online mft programs to become marriage and family therapists, intervening in mental health from a systems perspective.

Social work offers another rewarding career option. By enrolling in one of the easiest social work programs to get into, graduates can address social and mental health issues in diverse communities. These related pathways, accessible through affordable and flexible online learning, complement the study of neuroscience and open doors to impactful careers in the mental health sector.

Best Scientists Citing Berthold Hedwig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles