World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5413
World Ranking
11674
National Ranking
216

Hugo Ledoux publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugo Ledoux sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 149 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hugo Ledoux D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugo Ledoux sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hugo Ledoux is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the domain of 3D modeling and geospatial applications. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields, including engineering, environmental science, and earth and planetary sciences. Within these areas, they have focused particularly on building and construction, environmental engineering, geochemistry and petrology, geology, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their academic output includes journal articles and book chapters, with notable publication venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, and The Journal of Open Source Software.

Recent papers featuring their work include:

  • The Hessigheim 3D (H3D) benchmark on semantic segmentation of high-resolution 3D point clouds and textured meshes from UAV LiDAR and Multi-View-Stereo, 2021, Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
  • 3dfier: automatic reconstruction of 3D city models, 2021, The Journal of Open Source Software
  • Reconstructing compact building models from point clouds using deep implicit fields, 2022, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • Structure-aware Building Mesh Polygonization, 2020, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • DeltaDTM: A global coastal digital terrain model, 2024, Scientific Data

Ledoux's frequent coauthors include:

  • Ravi Peters
  • Jantien Stoter
  • Liangliang Nan
  • Ken Arroyo Ohori
  • Balázs Dukai

Their principal research topics cover:

  • 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Geological Modeling and Analysis
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Automated Road and Building Extraction

They have authored multiple editions of the book Computational Modelling of Terrains, published by the European Organization for Nuclear Research across the years 2020 to 2022.

Best Publications

  • Applications of 3D City Models: State of the Art Review

    Filip Biljecki;Jantien E. Stoter;Hugo Ledoux;Sisi Zlatanova

  • An improved LOD specification for 3D building models

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • Formalisation of the level of detail in 3D city modelling

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter;Junqiao Zhao;Junqiao Zhao

  • Transportation mode-based segmentation and classification of movement trajectories

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Peter van Oosterom

  • The Hessigheim 3D (H3D) benchmark on semantic segmentation of high-resolution 3D point clouds and textured meshes from UAV LiDAR and Multi-View-Stereo

    Michael Kölle;Dominik Laupheimer;Stefan Schmohl;Norbert Haala

  • Generating 3D city models without elevation data

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • Automatic conversion of IFC datasets to geometrically and semantically correct CityGML LOD3 buildings

    Sjors Donkers;Hugo Ledoux;Junqiao Zhao;Jantien E. Stoter

  • An Efficient Natural Neighbour Interpolation Algorithm for Geoscientific Modelling

    Hugo Ledoux;Christopher M. Gold

  • Topologically consistent 3D city models obtained by extrusion

    Hugo Ledoux;Martijn Meijers

  • AdTree: Accurate, Detailed, and Automatic Modelling of Laser-Scanned Trees

    Shenglan Du;Roderik Lindenbergh;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien E. Stoter

  • Processing BIM and GIS Models in Practice: Experiences and Recommendations from a GeoBIM Project in The Netherlands

    Ken Arroyo Ohori;Abdoulaye A. Diakité;Thomas Krijnen;Hugo Ledoux

  • The variants of an LOD of a 3D building model and their influence on spatial analyses

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien Stoter;George Vosselman

  • Propagation of positional error in 3D GIS: estimation of the solar irradiation of building roofs

    Filip Biljecki;Gerard B. M. Heuvelink;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien Stoter

  • CityJSON: a compact and easy-to-use encoding of the CityGML data model.

    Hugo Ledoux;Ken Arroyo Ohori;Kavisha Kumar;Balázs Dukai

  • Modelling and analysing 3D buildings with a primal/dual data structure

    Pawel Boguslawski;Christopher M. Gold;Hugo Ledoux

  • On the Validation of Solids Represented with the International Standards for Geographic Information

    Hugo Ledoux

  • GENERATION OF MULTI-LOD 3D CITY MODELS IN CITYGML WITH THE PROCEDURAL MODELLING ENGINE RANDOM3DCITY

    Filip Biljecki;Hugo Ledoux;Jantien Stoter

  • Modelling three-dimensional geoscientific fields with the Voronoi diagram and its dual

    H. Ledoux;C. M. Gold

  • Modelling three-dimensional fields in geoscience with the Voronoi diagram and its dual

    Hugo Ledoux

  • val3dity: validation of 3D GIS primitives according to the international standards

    Hugo Ledoux

  • CityJSON: a compact and easy-to-use encoding of the CityGML data model

    Hugo Ledoux;Ken Arroyo Ohori;Kavisha Kumar;Balázs Dukai

Frequent Co-Authors

Jantien Stoter
Jantien Stoter Delft University of Technology
Filip Biljecki
Filip Biljecki National University of Singapore
George Vosselman
George Vosselman University of Twente
Jan Dirk Wegner
Jan Dirk Wegner University of Zurich
Franz Rottensteiner
Franz Rottensteiner University of Hannover
Sisi Zlatanova
Sisi Zlatanova University of New South Wales
Helena Mitasova
Helena Mitasova North Carolina State University
Peter van Oosterom
Peter van Oosterom Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Computer Science opens up various flexible career pathways. For those seeking a quick entry into tech roles, earning an associate's degree online can be a smart, affordable start. These programs typically take two years or less and can lead to solid entry-level positions in IT support, networking, or software development.

To further boost your job prospects, consider pursuing certifications that pay well. Many IT certifications can be earned quickly and are highly regarded by employers, making them a great option for those who want to upskill without committing to a lengthy degree.

If you’re aiming for advanced roles or higher salaries, the masters degrees that are worth it list highlights in-demand programs where Computer Science frequently stands out. For those looking to fast-track their academic journey, exploring the shortest masters degree online can help you achieve your goals swiftly while minimizing time away from the workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Hugo Ledoux

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles