World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
9475
World Ranking
6465
National Ranking
203

Sisi Zlatanova publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sisi Zlatanova sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 328 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sisi Zlatanova D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sisi Zlatanova sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sisi Zlatanova is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science, with significant work in subfields such as Building and Construction, Environmental Engineering, Geology, Ocean Engineering, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

Sisi Zlatanova has contributed to multiple publications, with recent papers including:

  • "A Systematic Review of Digital Technology Adoption in Off-Site Construction: Current Status and Future Direction towards Industry 4.0", 2020, published in Buildings
  • "Indoor 3D reconstruction from point clouds for optimal routing in complex buildings to support disaster management", 2020, published in Automation in Construction
  • "Indoor navigation supported by the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC): A survey", 2020, published in Automation in Construction
  • "Leveraging generative AI for urban digital twins: a scoping review on the autonomous generation of urban data, scenarios, designs, and 3D city models for smart city advancement", 2024, published in Urban Informatics
  • "Grid-optimized UAV indoor path planning algorithms in a complex environment", 2022, published in International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Zlatanova include Mitko Aleksandrov, Abdoulaye Diakité, J. Barton, Ruihang Xie, and Jinwoo Lee.

The scientist's work appears prominently in several publication venues, notably:

  • The "international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Buildings
  • International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Best Publications

  • Applications of 3D City Models: State of the Art Review

    Filip Biljecki;Jantien E. Stoter;Hugo Ledoux;Sisi Zlatanova

  • A Systematic Review of Digital Technology Adoption in Off-Site Construction: Current Status and Future Direction towards Industry 4.0

    Mudan Wang;Cynthia Changxin Wang;Samad Sepasgozar;Sisi Zlatanova

  • A BIM-Oriented Model for supporting indoor navigation requirements

    Umit Isikdag;Umit Isikdag;Sisi Zlatanova;Jason Underwood

  • Topological models and frameworks for 3D spatial objects

    Unknown

  • Towards Defining a Framework for Automatic Generation of Buildings in CityGML Using Building Information Models

    Umit Isikdag;Sisi Zlatanova

  • Evacuation Route Calculation of Inner Buildings

    Shi Pu;Sisi Zlatanova

  • Review: 3D geo-database research: Retrospective and future directions

    Martin Breunig;Sisi Zlatanova

  • 3D GEO-INFORMATION INDOORS: STRUCTURING FOR EVACUATION

    M. Meijers;S. Zlatanova;N. Pfeifer

  • Indoor 3D reconstruction from point clouds for optimal routing in complex buildings to support disaster management

    Shayan Nikoohemat;Abdoulaye A. Diakité;Sisi Zlatanova;George Vosselman

  • Automatic Registration of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Point Clouds using Panoramic Reflectance Images

    Zhizhong Kang;Jonathan Li;Liqiang Zhang;Qile Zhao

  • The Balance Between Geometry and Topology

    Peter van Oosterom;Jantien Stoter;Wilko Quak;Sisi Zlatanova

  • 3D GIS, where are we standing?

    J.E. Stoter;S. Zlatanova

  • Ontologies for Disaster Management Response

    Wei Xu;Sisi Zlatanova

  • 4D cadastres: First analysis of legal, organizational, and technical impact—With a case study on utility networks

    Fatih Döner;Rod Thompson;Rod Thompson;Jantien Stoter;Christiaan Lemmen

  • Spatial subdivision of complex indoor environments for 3D indoor navigation

    Abdoulaye A. Diakité;Sisi Zlatanova

  • On 3D topological relationships

    Unknown

  • A SWOT analysis on the implementation of Building Information Models within the geospatial environment

    U. Isikdag;S. Zlatanova

  • Establishing a national standard for 3D topographic data compliant to CityGML

    L. van den Brink;J. Stoter;S. Zlatanova

  • 3D spatial relationships model: a useful concept for 3D cadastre?

    Unknown

  • Initial investigations for modeling interior Utilities within 3D Geo Context: Transforming IFC- interior utility to CityGML/UtilityNetworkADE

    Ihab Hijazi;Manfred Ehlers;Sisi Zlatanova;Thomas Becker

  • Automatically enhancing CityGML LOD2 models with a corresponding indoor geometry

    Roeland Boeters;Ken Arroyo Ohori;Filip Biljecki;Sisi Zlatanova

  • Solutions for 4D cadastre-with a case study on utility networks

    Fatih Doner;Rod Thompson;Jantien Stoter;Christiaan Lemmen

  • Advances in 3D Geoinformation Systems

    Peter van Oosterom;Sisi Zlatanova;Friso Penninga;Elfriede Fendel

  • Remote Sensing and GIS Technologies for Monitoring and Prediction of Disasters

    Shailesh Nayak;Sisi Zlatanova

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter van Oosterom
Peter van Oosterom Delft University of Technology
Jantien Stoter
Jantien Stoter Delft University of Technology
Suzana Dragićević
Suzana Dragićević Simon Fraser University
George Vosselman
George Vosselman University of Twente
Jonathan Li
Jonathan Li University of Waterloo
Hugo Ledoux
Hugo Ledoux Delft University of Technology
Filip Biljecki
Filip Biljecki National University of Singapore
Ashfaq Khokhar
Ashfaq Khokhar Iowa State University
Martin L. Kersten
Martin L. Kersten Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Qile Zhao
Qile Zhao Wuhan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Computer Science opens doors to a wide range of career options, but it’s also useful to consider related pathways that can expand your opportunities and interests. For example, if you're interested in sustainability, you may want to discover what jobs you can get with an environmental science degree. This field intersects with technology and data analytics, making it a strong complement to Computer Science studies.

Flexibility is another key advantage when pursuing higher education. Many choose a 2-year computer science degree online, which allows students to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are especially appealing for those balancing work or family commitments.

Additionally, engineering offers promising prospects. You can look into affordable programs such as an environmental engineering degree or learn about mechanical engineering degree cost to find options that fit your budget and career goals. These fields often overlap with Computer Science, especially in automation, robotics, and sustainability sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Sisi Zlatanova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles