World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
71
Citations
17457
World Ranking
2416
National Ranking
219

Robert Perneczky publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Perneczky sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 344 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert Perneczky D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Perneczky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Perneczky is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and neuroscience, with a particular focus on dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and neurodegenerative processes. Their extensive publication record reflects contributions to both clinical and translational studies in these domains.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Their work also covers key subfields such as:

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Physiology
  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Robert Perneczky's research topics frequently address:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Recent noteworthy papers authored or co-authored by Robert Perneczky include:

  • Anti-amyloid antibody therapies in Alzheimer's disease, 2023, Brain
  • Microglial activation states drive glucose uptake and FDG-PET alterations in neurodegenerative diseases, 2021, Science Translational Medicine
  • Dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from human studies, 2021, Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
  • Mediterranean Diet, Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers, and Brain Atrophy in Old Age, 2021, Neurology
  • Plasma extracellular vesicle tau and TDP-43 as diagnostic biomarkers in FTD and ALS, 2024, Nature Medicine

Frequent co-authors associated with Robert Perneczky's research include:

  • Boris-Stephan Rauchmann
  • Oliver Peters
  • Josef Priller
  • Jens Wiltfang
  • Katharina Büerger

Publication venues where Robert Perneczky has appeared regularly include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

In addition to journal articles, Robert Perneczky has contributed to academic books, such as "Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease Drug Development," published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Multicenter Standardized 18F-FDG PET Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease, and Other Dementias

    Lisa Mosconi;Wai H. Tsui;Wai H. Tsui;Karl Herholz;Alberto Pupi

  • Mapping scores onto stages: mini-mental state examination and clinical dementia rating.

    Robert Perneczky;Stefan Wagenpfeil;Katja Komossa;Timo Grimmer

  • Core outcome measures for interventions to prevent or slow the progress of dementia for people living with mild to moderate dementia: Systematic review and consensus recommendations

    Lucy Webster;Derek Groskreutz;Anna Grinbergs-Saull Grinbergs-Saull;Rob Howard

  • Frontotemporal dementia and its subtypes: a genome-wide association study

    Raffaele Ferrari;Raffaele Ferrari;Dena G Hernandez;Dena G Hernandez;Michael A Nalls;Jonathan D Rohrer

  • Progress toward standardized diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment: Guidelines from the Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study

    Olivia Skrobot;Sandra Black;Christopher Chen;Charles Decarli

  • Complex activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment: conceptual and diagnostic issues

    Robert Perneczky;Corina Pohl;Christian Sorg;Julia Hartmann

  • A Pan‐European Study of the C9orf72 Repeat Associated with FTLD: Geographic Prevalence, Genomic Instability, and Intermediate Repeats

    Julie van der Zee;Ilse Gijselinck;Lubina Dillen;Tim Van Langenhove

  • Amyloid beta peptide ratio 42/40 but not A beta 42 correlates with phospho-Tau in patients with low- and high-CSF A beta 40 load.

    Jens Wiltfang;Hermann Esselmann;Mirko Bibl;Michael Hüll

  • Impairment of activities of daily living requiring memory or complex reasoning as part of the MCI syndrome

    Robert Perneczky;Corina Pohl;Christian Sorg;Julia Hartmann

  • Effect of APOE genotype on amyloid plaque load and gray matter volume in Alzheimer disease

    A. Drzezga;T. Grimmer;G. Henriksen;M. Mühlau

  • Microglial activation states drive glucose uptake and FDG-PET alterations in neurodegenerative diseases.

    Xianyuan Xiang;Xianyuan Xiang;Karin Wind;Karin Wind;Thomas Wiedemann;Tanja Blume;Tanja Blume

  • Nutrition for the ageing brain: Towards evidence for an optimal diet

    David Vauzour;Maria Camprubi-Robles;Sophie Miquel-Kergoat;Cristina Andres-Lacueva

  • The Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study

    Olivia A. Skrobot;John T. O'brien;Sandra E. Black;Christopher Chen

  • Imaging of amyloid plaques and cerebral glucose metabolism in semantic dementia and Alzheimer’s disease

    Alexander Drzezga;Timo Grimmer;Gjermund Henriksen;Isabelle Stangier

  • Progression to dementia in clinical subtypes of mild cognitive impairment.

    P. Alexopoulos;T. Grimmer;R. Perneczky;G. Domes

  • The role of TREM2 R47H as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease.

    Christina M. Lill;Christina M. Lill;Aina Rengmark;Lasse Pihlstrøm;Isabella Fogh

  • Multivariate network analysis of fiber tract integrity in Alzheimer's disease.

    Stefan J. Teipel;Robert Stahl;Olaf Dietrich;Stefan O. Schoenberg

  • Biomarker validation of a cued recall memory deficit in prodromal Alzheimer disease

    M. Wagner;S. Wolf;F.M. Reischies;M. Daerr

  • Soluble amyloid precursor proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid as novel potential biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: a multicenter study.

    P Lewczuk;H Kamrowski-Kruck;O Peters;I Heuser

  • Cerebrospinal fluid cortisol and clinical disease progression in MCI and dementia of Alzheimer's type

    Julius Popp;Julius Popp;Steffen Wolfsgruber;Steffen Wolfsgruber;Isabella Heuser;Oliver Peters

  • Multivariate and univariate neuroimaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.

    Christian G. Habeck;Norman L. Foster;Robert Perneczky;Alexander Kurz

  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

    Diehl-Schmid J;Neumann M;Laws Sm;Perneczky R

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Drzezga
Alexander Drzezga University of Cologne
Jens Wiltfang
Jens Wiltfang University of Göttingen
Hans Förstl
Hans Förstl Technical University of Munich
Alexander Kurz
Alexander Kurz Technical University of Munich
Timo Grimmer
Timo Grimmer Technical University of Munich
Frank Jessen
Frank Jessen University of Cologne
Oliver Peters
Oliver Peters German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Katharina Buerger
Katharina Buerger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner TU Dresden
Josef Priller
Josef Priller Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a range of careers in mental health, research, counseling, and social work. Many students interested in brain science also explore degrees in related fields to expand their career opportunities. For those seeking clinical positions or leadership in social services, accelerated msw programs online can be a fast, effective way to advance.

If you’re eager to deepen your knowledge of human behavior, a fast track psychology degree online offers a flexible and efficient study path. Psychology and neuroscience often intersect in areas like cognitive science and behavioral health, making this a strong complementary choice.

For those interested in supporting mental wellness directly, earning the most affordable online masters in mental health counseling can lead to roles in therapy, school counseling, or rehabilitation. Affordability matters, and students can also consider the cheapest mental health counseling degree options to maximize value without sacrificing quality.

Whether your passion lies in neuroscience, psychology, social work, or counseling, multiple online pathway options exist to help you reach your goals and contribute to the growing field of mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Perneczky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles